Hi /p/. It's been quite some time since I made a thread,

File: 20161012-scan294.jpg (493KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 1000x1000px

I don't really have any theme for these or anything, either. Just my adventures over the last year or so.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:01

File: 20160914-scan309.jpg (608KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

608KB, 1000x1000px

This is the same location as the OP pic.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:32

File: 20161005-scan319.jpg (546KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 1000x1000px

forest fires suck

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:42

>>2945465

sad looking land. but would make up for a terrific movie location.

are you the 6x6 provia anon?

File: 20160912-scan301.jpg (588KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

588KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945468
6x6 yes, provia no. I have a bunch of shots from the east coast that you might be thinking of? I shoot mostly portra, ektar, and velvia.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:13

hey, kevin here, not really a big fan of these photos if I am to be honest
at least you tried

regards,
Kevin from /p/

File: 20161012-scan302.jpg (552KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945481
That's OK. Can't please everyone.

I'm not done yet so maybe you'll find something you like?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:15

>>2945482
Some good pics OP. First one was nice. Wish the log cabin one had more of that mountain.

File: 20161005-scan239.jpg (430KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945492
Yeah, me too. Lots of trees in the way if I went any wider, though...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:31

File: 20161012-scan285.jpg (593KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 1000x1000px

Hiking my normal 4-day loadout in addition to 18lbs of camera kit is a fucking nightmare.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 16:55:45

Awesome to see another 6x6 landscape shooter here. I'll wait till you have a good chunk posted and then give some crit.

What grad ND strength are you using in some of these? Looks like a 3 stop which may be a bit too much imo.

File: 20161005-scan347.jpg (525KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 1000x667px

>>2945527
Most of them are 3 stop. I've been meaning to pick up one of those inverse doodads, they look like a great alternative.

Have some expired ektachrome through an old olympus XA

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:48

3 decent photo threads up, well done OP

>>2945474
Are you McDong?
Pretty sure I recognize that cabin.

Comfy thread, pls post more XA chromes.

File: 20161005-scan381.jpg (428KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

428KB, 1000x667px

>>2945577
XA chromes as requested.

Yep, it's me!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:54

File: 20161012-scan325.jpg (586KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

586KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945550
Thx sucralose.

I got quite a bit more to post, but this'll be it for tonight. More tomorrow.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 16:32:42

>>2945578
Holy fuck that's comfy. Sell your MF and buy ektachrome for the cash.

Good to see you around, looking forward to seeing the rest of the shots.

>>2945581
Thanks Catsby, I'm hoping to keep adding to this thread for at least a few days. Gonna run through all my film stuff that's been on backlog and then shitpost all the digishits!

you posted! :D
>>2945474
i liek

File: 20161005-scan304.jpg (658KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 1000x1000px

The coldest bathroom I've ever used.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:18

File: 20161005-scan264.jpg (468KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1000x1000px

Sometimes you decide to sleep outside under the stars. Great way to wake up.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:43

File: 20161005-scan330.jpg (407KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1000x1000px

This one time I rode my bike 120 miles on a photo trip and only took like 1 picture.

Day after the worst storm I've ever been through. It was all good, though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:45

>>2945455
>>2945460
I really like these two.
Really stunning.

File: 20161005-scan281.jpg (479KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 1000x1000px

Being lazy at the hot springs with an awesome view of the Conundrum Valley.

We camped here for a couple nights.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:58

>>2945873

jesus fuckity fucking fuck reeeeeeeeeeee im jealous of not taking that shoot.

is all of this hassy? what film?

File: 20161005-scan263.jpg (510KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945883
Nah, I wish I had a hassy. These are mostly from a Bronica SQ, but some of them are from a yashica-mat 124G.

I'll be posting some rectangles later on that are all either olympus XA or leica. We can play "olympus or leica" and find out if the camera actually matters lol.

Here's another Yashica shot

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:41

>>2945883
>what film?
Portra, Ektar, and Velvia.

>>2945455
>>2945459
>>2945460
These are soft and the colors look overcooked. Composition is very pleasing on 1st and 3rd.
>>2945465
Highlights are burned but at least the colors look okay. Also nice and sharp.

File: 20161005-scan315.jpg (531KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945891
Yeah, once I looked at these on a different monitor I realized that. I'll probably re-adjust them before I print or anything like that.

I was disappointed when I got back almost a whole roll of out-of-focus shots. Not sure how I fucked that up but now I have to live with it. I guess even at f/22-32 you can still fuck up if you forget to set hyperfocal :( :( :(

I seriously need to get a hardware calibrator. Software calibration just doesn't cut it.

Have a rock.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:37

>>2945525
Whistler/Russet lake?

File: 20161012-scan365.jpg (490KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945895
Nah, this is the trail to Conundrum Hot Springs in Aspen, CO

(and yes, there is a holga in this pic....)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:52

A lot of great shots in this thread, I need to shoot more

File: 20161005-scan295.jpg (444KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 1000x1000px

This was taken in a little town called "Gold Hill" in the foothills. On the plains is Boulder, CO

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:05

>>2945896
good one

Good stuff. I surmise I will return to film soon, these are comfy as fuck.

File: 20161005-scan292.jpg (540KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

540KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945938
thumbs up . jpeg.

are you in Denver yet? I have a yashica electro 35 gtn (the black one) that you can have if you want it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:00

>>2945943

We just left but might be headed back, or headed through on this load. Top secret shit can't tell you what we got, but my email can be found on 500px.com/sugarysweet inbox me and we can arrange something.

Denver is pretty nice good food, there's a Huhot by our yard we can probably meet up near there.

File: 20160912-scan306.jpg (621KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 1000x1000px

>>2945950
>>2945950
>huhot

Dunno where your yard is, but if you want the good vegan shit you gotta come down to Sputnik, on broadway & ellsworth ave.

Email in name section, lmk if/when you come thru.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:24

File: 20161005-scan305.jpg (450KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 1000x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:20

File: 20160909-scan272.jpg (630KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

630KB, 1000x1000px

I particularly like this one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:52

File: 20161005-scan362.jpg (587KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 1000x1000px

I thought this tree was also pretty neat.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:50

File: 20161003-scan378.jpg (557KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 1000x667px

Couple more from the XA...

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:54

File: 20161012-scan348.jpg (478KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 1000x667px

This was a fun trip.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:49

>>2946205

haters gonna hate: the tree.

>>2945455
>>2945331
WHY?

File: 20161012-scan385.jpg (430KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 667x1000px

She seemed really interested in the construction.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:55

>>2946211
Why what?

>>2946211

lmfao OP get your shit together baka

File: 20160910-scan270.jpg (484KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 1000x1000px

>>2946211
>>2946214
Hey. I can't get it right every time, can I?

What do you think about the other ones?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:48

>>2946213
Why the fuck did you edit film and make the photograph something that it's not? The original is literally 100x better, why ruin the soft blue tones and mood?

>>2946216
>What do you think about the other ones?
I don't know what to think now, for all I know this forest could be yellow and the fire just photoshopped in.

>>2946216

can you post the before pp of this one >>2945459 ?

File: 20161005-scan320.jpg (569KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

569KB, 1000x1000px

>>2946219
I will tomorrow if I have enough time. I'm not at my main computer right now and probably won't for a little bit.

But, I will. I did post earlier in response to another anon about noticing them being overcooked on a different screen. So I know they're not right.

Also have a bunch of stuff to edit still.

I'll be back later.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:43

>>2946211
Lol that's atrocious

>>2946222
Shit I love this one man. Been in the Colorado foothills so many times but this captures the feel of a winter day there so well. I'm impressed.

File: 20161005-scan296.jpg (441KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 1000x1000px

>>2946224
It's Buffalo Creek, one of my favorite spots.

Same spot as that mountain bike pic.

Different spot than this, which sadly is a little out of focus. Not thrilled about that.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:07

>>2946222
Stop editing film then you cunt, clearly digital is more suitable for you

>>2946228
>implying digitized film images don't need editing
>implying a straight scan is somehow more pure

>>2946274
>implying digitized film images don't need editing
Yeah not to this extent you idiot lmao >>2946211

File: 20161012-scan318.jpg (448KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1000x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:40

File: 20161005-scan279.jpg (449KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 1000x1000px

Not so happy about that shadow on dude's back. Oh well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:56

File: 20161005-scan260.jpg (405KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1000x1000px

Another one that's slightly out of focus. I think I was drunk or something.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:35

File: 20161005-scan241.jpg (641KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

641KB, 1000x1000px

Pretty stormy day

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:04:32

File: 20160912-scan299.jpg (558KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 1000x1000px

It's almost snowshoeing season again. I'm not real big on skiing, so we do this instead.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:12 14:05:10

>>2946219
https://cloud.kmcdon.com/s/FDxvigbESsqUo3b

https://cloud.kmcdon.com/s/N9ESevQS2R6Fp4f

Here you go duderino, 2 full size, unedited jpegs for you. Please post your take on editing, I'm genuinely looking forward to it.

File: 20160908-scan249.jpg (418KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 669x1000px

Wouldn't quite be a me thread without a shitty mirror selfie.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:04:47

File: 20160909-scan268.jpg (456KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 1000x1000px

Someone insisted on playing with my camera one day, another of me.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:05:37

File: 20161012-scan236-2.jpg (451KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1000x665px

A few from various bike trips. I've gotten into bikepacking/camping/touring/whatever and it's excellent.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:03:30

File: 20161012-scan235.jpg (655KB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 1000x665px

This guy and the next guy are both absolute madmen.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:03:48

File: 20160919-scan265.jpg (500KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 1000x1000px

M A D M A N

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:05:21

>>2945465
Really fucking love this shot.
>>2945482
I dig this. The slight angle of the roof twisting to the left of the frame coupled with the mountain slanting up to the right really balances well together.
>>2945580
I'm not a fan of the cyan hue of the sky, and I wish the building wasn't so close to the bottom of the frame, but I still really enjoy this.

File: 20160908-scan246.jpg (659KB, 1000x672px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 1000x672px

>>2946397
Thanks.

Yeah, I seriously need to get a hardware calibrator. No matter how many times I "calibrate" my screen using software tools, it's never spot on. Looks good one one screen, then I see it on my laptop and say "Damnit."

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:04:19

>>2946277
Then what extent, pray tell, is acceptable?

File: 20160908-scan252.jpg (567KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 1000x1000px

>>2946399
I'm assuming you're the anon from last night who asked about the full res jpegs?

My answer, snarky or not, would be that the extent of editing to which is acceptable is the extent that I deem acceptable, since I'm taking these pictures to make me happy, not other people.

But, like I said before, upon further review they are definitely overcooked.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:04:59

File: 20160207-_DSC7959-2.jpg (374KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 1000x664px

I made some digishits as well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:28:48
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Brightness	-4.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20160531-_DSC7995.jpg (577KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 1000x664px

Meow.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:30:40
Exposure Time	1/13 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Brightness	-6.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2946382

all right thanks, will try my hand at them and deliver, in the course of the day.

File: 20160820-_DSC8482.jpg (345KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 1000x664px

>>2946409
Awesome!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:32:25
Exposure Time	1/1600 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	3.3 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2946382
>>2946409

tried but cant access them, dunno why. can you post them here? at like 2000px and low compression. they are for tone shaping, not pixel peeping, so itll be fine.

File: 20160818-_DSC8309.jpg (636KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 1000x664px

>>2946412
https://kmcdon.com/p/20161005-scan243-2.jpg
https://kmcdon.com/p/20161012-scan294-2.jpg

Do these links work? I'm about to head out for a while so hopefully they're OK.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:27:46
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	1.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2946414
>Do these links work?

now they do, cheers.

File: 20160820-_DSC8550.jpg (335KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1000x664px

>>2946419
Awesome.

I think you were getting blocked by my firewall. First links were at my home lab, second links are on a VPS somewhere. Interested to see what you come up with!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:32:39
Exposure Time	1/2000 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	4.7 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20160406-P1030952.jpg (499KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 1000x664px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	24 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:30:23
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.10 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20160406-P1030949.jpg (629KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

629KB, 1000x667px

I think I got dust in my camera

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX3
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:14 08:30:14
Exposure Time	1/1000 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	80
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.10 mm

>>2947679
you got shit in your camera
thats whats coming out

>>2947707
Is dust shit?

File: image1.jpg (1MB, 3000x1446px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x1446px

>>2946421

here OP, this is what i did.

if my judgement is to be trusted, this should be ektar. ive seen it tends to lump tonal ranges into colors that seem to be the same but aint. example: all that grass seems to be all shades of cyan-green, but if you pick the green, yelloe and blue chanel and shift them out of their current hue, they start to separate from the cyan and show tonal richness and contrast against each other, which helps the viewer to make sense of what hes looking at.

also your resizing/resampling/sharpening routine is all sorts of garbage (at least the OP pic) aka. hard halos and still smudgy image.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:17 00:47:25
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3000
Image Height	1446

File: image2.jpg (1MB, 3000x1086px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3000x1086px

>>2947811

here is what i did to the other one.

this is a weird photo. managed to take out the magenta bullshit but still not convinced, so i went b&w and it looks kinda cool. sorta. it already has this infrared look, that seems to help. couldnt be fucked to save the dumb cloud.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:17 01:38:35
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3000
Image Height	1086

>>2947811
>if my judgement is to be trusted, this should be ektar.

It's actually velvia, which is why it's so purpleish in the first place. I do like your version better, though.

The other one looks kinda neat in BW.

Thanks for doing that.

File: 20160919-scan360.jpg (651KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

651KB, 1000x667px

I think maybe I have more snapshits and more squares to edit/post tomorrow.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:20 22:50:21

>>2947839
it's just a messy picture. you can tweak the colors all you like but you still wont be happy with it

>>2947839
put the sky from the first one and combine it with the foreground from the second one. The foreground is messy af so you'll have to rely on color contrast for separation and simplicity.

>>2945459
>>2945455
>>2945460
are these shot at twilight? Really digging the nuances of color in the sky

File: 20161021-scan327.jpg (561KB, 1000x968px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 1000x968px

>>2950691
So the one with the people was at twilight, and the one with the headlamp trails I set up sometime around midnight, and left the shutter open just until the faintest hint of sunrise.

When I woke up I was worried that I'd destroyed the photo because of the sunrise in progress, but was pleasantly surprised when I got the film back.

Here's another from an unrelated, but just as fun camping trip.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 10:29:30

OP and everyone else

Why do these pictures have such a /comfy/ feel to them? Is it the style? is it something inherent about film (gearfaggotry??)?

File: 20160914-scan311.jpg (366KB, 989x1000px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 989x1000px

>>2950694
Probably the combination of film and the outdoors, but I'm guessing that it's got a lot to do with the format (6x6 film) that gives it a different feel.

I was pretty unhappy about this one. Guess I have a light leak, didn't even try to save it because THE BACKING PAPER BLED THROUGH REEEEEEEEEE

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 10:32:32

>>2950694
perhaps its the shallow DoF, square crops combined with minimalistic style?

>>2950696
whats your setup like?

>>2950694
P O R T R A
O
R
T
R
A

File: 20161021-scan351.jpg (539KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1000x667px

Please lord save me I have no idea what happened here.

This blood trail continued for a whole block.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 10:37:49

>>2950694

its the deep tones, m8.

File: 20161021-scan339.jpg (282KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1000x667px

>>2950698
All the squares either came from a Bronica SQ (50, 80, 150mm lenses) or a Yashica-mat 124G

The wrecktangles are all either from a Leica with zeiss/voigtlander lenses, the body doesn't even matter, or an olympus XA

(or a NEX-6 with the voigt/zeiss lenses)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 10:40:36

File: 20161021-scan357.jpg (557KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

557KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 10:48:17

File: 20161021-scan254.jpg (545KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

545KB, 1000x1000px

>shooting at high noon

Oh well, I still like it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 10:51:46

File: 20161021-scan323.jpg (464KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 1000x1000px

Love this place.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 10:59:42

File: 20161021-scan361-2.jpg (555KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:06:34

File: 20161021-scan383.jpg (625KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

625KB, 1000x667px

>stahp it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:10:30

File: 20160820-_DSC8535.jpg (437KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 1000x664px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:22:11
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.0 EV
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20160820-_DSC8384.jpg (636KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 1000x664px

Couple digishits I guess.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:24:12
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Brightness	-5.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20160730-_DSC8123.jpg (565KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 1000x664px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:25:40
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	2.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20151219-_DSC7788.jpg (420KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 1000x664px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:26:55
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Brightness	-2.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 20161021-scan248.jpg (642KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 1000x667px

fuckin love road cones.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:29:17

File: 20161005-scan354.jpg (562KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

562KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:29:58

File: 20161003-scan387.jpg (405KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1000x667px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:31:22

File: 20160618-_DSC8017.jpg (398KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1000x664px

Aaaaaand I think that's about all I have for you guys.

Critique away if you like, otherwise just let this thread die in pain.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	NEX-6
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.3 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	264 dpi
Vertical Resolution	264 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:21 11:33:19
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	250
Brightness	-0.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Other
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2945455

I like the idea of this photo, but the composition is imperfect and the processing looks kind of strange. My depth cues are kind of messed up from the large areas of high contrast layered on top of each other (light background, very dark midground, light foreground again). My monitor isn't properly calibrated right now, but when I check on my Apple devices it still looks like the colours are a bit wonky. Like a magenta shift or something.

>>2945459

I repeat my complaint about depth cues but I like this photo a lot anyway. It's got a lot of nice tones and colours to it, my only real complaint there's no clear main subject. Maybe that's not such a bad thing.

>>2945460
>>2945465
>>2945474

8/8 gr8

>>2945482

This looks super comfy but I wish it was framed just a bit looser. Hut takes up too much space imo

You responded to another anon about that, but I'm not certain that more trees in the midground is such a bad thing. It might be nice and [contextual]

>>2945496

Beautiful sunset and colours, but ultimately kind of boring

>>2945525

GET THESE DIRTY HUMANS OUT OF MY PRISTINE WILDERNESS RRREEEEEEE

>>2945535

It looks like something really cool is happening in the background. I'm not sure what the right way to approach this photo is, it certainly had a lot of potential, but there's no good middle and the foreground is lacklustre

>>2945580

I would definitely stay at this hotel if given the chance and a bolt cutter

>>2945775

lol why an outhouse shot? If this is documentary-like, or like a vacation photo for yourself, I can see why you took it. The depth of the snow is interesting (to me), but I don't think it's not a good photo on its own or part of a set.

>>2945778
>>2945873
>>2945896

Pretty good, looks like marketing material for an REI catalogue

>>2945894

Really cool rock, but again I think I would have framed it a bit wider

>>2945917

c r u s h e d b l a c k s

Also I don't know if square frame is the best choice, and also depth cues again

>>2950739
Thanks for useful feedback.

I think a lot of the out-of-context ones (like the outhouse, for example) are just things that I thought were *neat* at the time and snapped. Regarding that cabin that's framed too closely, I'm going back in a few months so I'll try it wider and see what happens :)

>>2946202

This one just sucks =(

>>2946204

You are right to be proud of this one =)

>>2946205

Splendid

>>2946208
>>2946209

More REI catalogue material

>>2946212

This looks like the kind of street photo I would take. That is to say, you should have gotten closer lol

>>2946216

About the REI catalogue look: I would caution against being so consistent about using thin DoF all of the time, because it can quickly become gimmicky. Just because you have a MF camera doesn't mean you have to open up the aperture, and I'm not saying that just because I'm a filthy APS-C digifag

>>2946222

Too much falloff into the background, this is the opposite of the issue in the first few photos. I have to squint to see the mountains in the background. Again I question the appropriateness of a square composition.

>>2946225
>>2946370

Damn these would have been awesome if they were focused properly lol

>>2946366

This one's kinda lame.

>>2946372

This one is boring and it illustrates the issue with relying on thin DoF, just because the midground is out of focus doesn't mean the forest is not distracting.

I won't say too much about the rest, but of the urban shots these are my favourite:

>>2950714
>>2950728

But:

>>2950727

You know what Dill always says, never shoot people's backs unless you have some compelling reason.

Overall recommendations: don't ask me for advice because I am not at all qualified to teach photography, pay more attention to what depth cues are doing to your perspective, ask yourself if a square crop is the most appropriate, and watch out for thin DoF/bokeh becoming too gimmicky. Finally, if you want to post critique threads, I encourage you to split them up thematically, or else the personal/outdoors/urban stuff in one great hodgepodge makes it harder to criticize (as we are not all experts in all genres at once)

>>2950742
>You know what Dill always says, never shoot people's backs unless you have some compelling reason.

Oh shit, you got me on that one :^)