[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

why are you still using large cumbersome outdated BODY cameras

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 103
Thread images: 24

why are you still using large cumbersome outdated BODY cameras with big heavy interchangable lenses when you can now have in the palm of your hand a better camera than a DSLR?

>literally 2 cameras
>literally better than any dslr
>smaller
>lighter
>larger screen
>you can download editing apps
>you have access to the internet so it can upload instantly
>it can stream to the internet with better than DSLR quality
>also does 4k video
>integrated 1.8
>integrated telephoto
>why dont you just kill yourself
>literally your choice is to be a applefag or just be one of those old antiquated old school lug and tug around pounds and pounds of equipment that can just get stolen (rio 2016 anyone?)

>kys
>>
>projecting his suicidal thoughts this hard
it's okay OP we're here for ya
>>
File: 1450714553313.jpg (98KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]
1450714553313.jpg
98KB, 960x960px
>>2936677
pretending to know anything about psychology in a photography board

>old stuck in old ways
>old dog cant learn new trigs
>gotta pull a trig from the old bag since i will never agcept new tegnology
>oh these yungsters, better try and poke at their ego
>why am i carrying 25 lbs in lenses
>oh its because that yungin wants to kill himself yeah yeah
>kys senpai 1999 was a long time ago


>pic related taken with the superior master race iphone 7 plus
>>
File: IMG_0019.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0019.jpg
2MB, 4032x3024px
I got the 7 Plus a couple of days ago but have only managed to test the camera in low-light situations so far (pic related). The 56mm lens is only f2.8 so I look forward to seeing what it can do in actual daylight.
>>
File: V4_wa.jpg (63KB, 882x942px) Image search: [Google]
V4_wa.jpg
63KB, 882x942px
>>2936676
OP you are right
DSLRs are for chumps
that's why I shoot 4x5 with the intention of moving up to 8x10
>>
File: image.jpg (47KB, 422x700px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
47KB, 422x700px


[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width422
Image Height700
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: image.jpg (98KB, 640x336px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
98KB, 640x336px
>>2936717

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width640
Image Height336
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2936708
Absolutely disgusting. My old ass beaten up Helios 44M-2 with stuck focus ring can do much better.
>>
>>2936736
Of course it can, you idiot. The 44 series are regarded as some of the best budget lenses out there. Doesn't mean the phone can't take stunning photos.

Here's a test with more light. I think it's much better.
>>
File: IMG_0022.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0022.jpg
2MB, 4032x3024px
>>2936743
>>
>>2936744
My bloated DSLR similarly messes up the deatils in low light above ISO 6400.
Face the facts, you bought an expensive potato.
>>
>>2936745
You're really angry aren't you?
>>
>>2936744
>that red channel
>>
>>2936746
Not really. I don't care about what you do or what you spend your autism bux on but your ignorance makes me sad. I'm really sorry for you, Anon. You will never be better than this.
>>
>>2936748
Typical sRGB pleb. No microdetail, shallow color depth, everything is lost in a mess of saturated colors.
This is why you should use AdobeRGB in camera and convert to web-safe RGB as a last step. This way you preserve all the extra detail the AdobeRGB color space picked up.
>>
>>2936744
my old d3200 with kit lens which i don't even use looks better than this at 12k ISO
>>
OP didnt get enough dicks to suck today so got bored and figured to bloat on /p/ instead
>>
>>2936744
Super soft
Blown channels
Dat noise
Zero fine detail

I'll stick to the leica in my p9 thanks
>>
>>2936798
>Leica

Can't tell if this is a joke or not. The p9 is no better quality than any other phone camera. You're limited by the physical size of the sensor and lenses
>>
>>2936815
I got it for the superior mono sensor.
Can't find that in a samsung galaxy.

Also, it doesn't apply a FUCK ton of sharpening, a la Samsung/Sony/Apple.

Oh, and it's thinner than the iphone AND doesn't have a stupid camera bump.
>>
>>2936709
Largest thing i shot was 1mx1m
>>
>>2936676
http://www.camerajabber.com/iphone-7-plus-vs-canon-eos-5d-mark-iv-image-quality-test/
Dslrfags suicide when?
>>
>>2936841
Not sure which is which but they didn't even take they effort of making the left one as good colour and composition-wise as the right one.
>>
>>2936683
Are you for real? The details look like watercolor and the maximum 50mm focal length is heinously unflattering for almost all people
>>
>2016
>DSLRs better than ever
>Film while (or because) antiquated provides outstanding potential added value
>Using any phone for actual photo work

Why am I even
>>
My parents came back from Norway with some stunning iPhone pictures, but that has less to do with the quality of the 6's camera and more to do with them climbing up to beautiful places.

It's better than nothing.
>>
>>2936676
BECAUSE MINE WONT SHIP UNTIL OCTOBER 20th /ragespiral
>>
>>2936744
Tap to focus you fucking mouthbreather
>>
>>2936888
Meanwhile in /p/
>walls
>shadows
>MUH COMPOSITION
>>
>>2936842
Was probably just in camera jpeg processing, the canon photo looks like it was shot at a wrong white balance
That or they processed the iPhone photo to be more pleasing
>>
>>2936676
>>2936683
Thats a pretty shit pic m8. Also you sound butt hurt because you cant afford a proper DLSR.
>>
I made my mom buy a Sony RX100

But now she takes pictures with her Nokia dumbphone and complains she can't transfer them because it doesn't even have a USB port.
>>
>>2936842
>Not sure which is which

Judging by the pig disgusting bokeh the right is a 5D with a nifty fifty.
>>
>>2936676
No replacement for displacement
>>
>>2936842
Right is too blue for a canon
>>
>>2936842
>left with fake bokeh
>>
>>2936842
>no bokeh balls
Applefags on sudoku watch
>>
>>2936934
Now that I think about it, I should send my dad my current DSLR when my new one comes in.
>>
>>2936962
>>2937047

Auto white balance.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/camerajabber/29888125481/in/album-72157674376999526/
relevant EXIF::

Make - Canon
White Point - 0.313 0.329
Primary Chromaticities - 0.64 0.33 0.21 0.71 0.15 0.06
YCb Cr Coefficients - 0.299 0.587 0.114
YCbCr Positioning - Co-sited
ISO Speed - 100
Metering Mode - Multi-segment
Color Space - Uncalibrated
Custom Rendered - Normal
Exposure Mode - Auto
White Balance - Auto
Scene Capture Type - Standard
Lens Info - 50mm f/0
Lens Model - EF50mm f/1.4 USM
Lens Serial Number - 0000000000
Gamma - 2.2
Contrast - Normal
Saturation - Normal
Camera ISO - Auto
Metering Mode - Evaluative
Lens Type - Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM or Zeiss Lens
Color Tone - Normal
SRAWQuality - n/a
Auto ISO - 100
Base ISO - 100
Measured EV - 11.00
Target Aperture - 1.8
Target Exposure Time - 1/645
White Balance - Auto
>>
File: facepalm cyberpunk.jpg (60KB, 635x665px) Image search: [Google]
facepalm cyberpunk.jpg
60KB, 635x665px
>>2936676
>better camera than a DSLR?
>literally better than any dslr
>better than DSLR quality
interstellar quality bait, would reply again, congratulation

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera SoftwareGIMP 2.8.10
PhotographerGiorgio Borgonovo
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:08:12 20:49:03
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/2.8
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/2.8
Exposure Bias0 EV
Subject Distance0.00 m
Metering ModePattern
FlashFlash, Compulsory
Focal Length70.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width635
Image Height665
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
>>
>>2936744
Honestly ? The colors are fucking disgusting so the contrasts and everything else !
>>
>>2936676
>literally
>literally
>literally
>literally

Can't you learn to talk/write properly?
>>
File: e9d.jpg (16KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]
e9d.jpg
16KB, 600x600px
you guys..
>>
>>2936842
right is fake bokeh
>>
>28 posters
Makes me sad that people in this board fall for such obvious bait.
>>
>>2936842

the key is to look at the stray hairs
>>
>>2937517
Left is shit bokeh of KIT ZOOM.
Way to do a "comparison".
>>
>>2937517
>>2938004

I've already posted a Flickr link with EXIF data here >>2937055

too lazy; did not click:
- right is 5Dmk4 with 50mm f/1.4 USM @ f/1.8
- so left if iPhone
>>
>>2936676
>implying niggers won't steal your iphone
>>
>>2936676
i'll buy an iphone when they put in a 1" sensor and f1.4 lens.
>>
>>2936744
just because you can take a nice photo with a phone doesnt mean its better than a dslr

and that photo isnt really anything special anyway
>>
>>2938153
I'd buy it with a 1" sensor and a flat 2.8 pancake desu.
But only if it was an android
>>
>>2938181
already exist. panasonic cm1
>>
>>2938207
It's a shame the CM1 seems to be pretty much dead in the water and can't be had with carrier "discounts." I came really close to buying one last year, when it was like $400 on holiday sale, but decided I'd be frustrated with how dated the phone hardware was within a year or so.
>>
File: IMG_2981.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2981.jpg
2MB, 3024x4032px
>>2936676
I shot this with my 6s.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareMicrosoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:09:29 08:07:22
Exposure Time1/1508 sec
F-Numberf/2.2
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating25
Lens Aperturef/2.2
Brightness10.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.15 mm
Comment{"DeviceAngle":0.07730711996555328}
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3024
Image Height4032
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: image-unrelated.jpg (245KB, 1000x440px) Image search: [Google]
image-unrelated.jpg
245KB, 1000x440px
>>2938844
Good for you buddy.
I shot this with my Bronica SQ-Ai
>>
I don't care about cameras in phones, but i would like a decent camera that has a phone in it.
>>
DSLR DOES RAW you faggot.... Try making that with an normal camera or a phone... First of all.. Apple fucked up all... Second you can take a clear shot of a single hair string from 10 meters...
>>
>>2938870
No need for the homophobia and rage. This isn't DP Review, you don't need to defend your right to shoot a camera to the death.
Why is there a larger influx of normies on /p/ nowadays?
>>
>>2938870
Iphone 7 does raw, android has done raw for years. Faggot
>>
>>2938359
>"discounts"
good goy.

>>2938844
jpg artifact, oversharpened, boring telephone pole. great.

>>2938875
>see those phone raws
>noise at base iso
>soft images
no wonder they overcook the jpgs.
my eos m is better.
>>
>>2938875
Crappy low detail raws
Prebaked sharpening
Prebaked noise reduction
Prebaked color & contrast
Ugly, inconsistent color at that

Is this what you want? Is this your future of photography?
>>
>>2938181
>It's not a zoom

Ladies and gentlemen.
>>
>>2938984
>thinking you can "prebake" things in a raw

daft twat.
>>
>>2939000
>Not knowing that you can
Ultra fucking new
>>
>>2938164
I never said it was better than a DSLR. I just said it takes really good photos.
>>
>>2936717
>>2936719
kekd hard. more please
>>
File: 1464026566722.jpg (35KB, 599x563px) Image search: [Google]
1464026566722.jpg
35KB, 599x563px
>>2936676
>>
>>2936676
>large
>cumbersome
What do you have cancer or something?
>>
>>2937052
yeah cause your dad is going to pack 20 more kilos of dslr weight and go climbing with it to take the same picture
>>
>>2940119

what do you shoot with ? YOUR IMAGINATION?
>>
My camera has a headphone port
>>
>>2940565
can your SHITslr do this?
>>
>>2938888
>>"discounts"
>good goy.

Most carriers in the US charge you the same amount whether you get a phone through them with a contract or bring your own unlocked phone. Might as well do it through them and get the phone for $300 instead of $800 or whatever.
>>
>>2940905
>>2938844
>>2936842
>>2936744
>>2936708
>>2936683

>all this horrifically bad artifacting and noise

cell phone photos only look good on cell phone screens
>>
File: Screenshot_20161006-095022.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_20161006-095022.png
2MB, 1440x2560px
The focus is super sharp on iPhone 7. Eat your heart out dslr fags.
>>
>>2941451
wtf i hate dslrs now?!
>>
File: iphone 7 photo.jpg (113KB, 610x610px) Image search: [Google]
iphone 7 photo.jpg
113KB, 610x610px
>>
File: donald-dump.jpg (237KB, 1458x1944px) Image search: [Google]
donald-dump.jpg
237KB, 1458x1944px
>>2936744
dat detail
>>
File: 1476655497475.gif (2MB, 245x187px) Image search: [Google]
1476655497475.gif
2MB, 245x187px
>>2941451

+1 for focus
>>
>>2936744
so phones finally have that point and shoot 200$ camera quality reh ?
>>
>blowing your money on overpriced tech
let me guess your last camera was a 5dmIII right anon ?
also 1+3 master race
>>
File: IMG_0098.jpg (4MB, 2734x3341px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0098.jpg
4MB, 2734x3341px
1/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 7
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.11.135096841
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:10:17 11:04:27
Exposure Time1/220 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating20
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness7.3 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length3.99 mm
Image Width2734
Image Height3341
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_0103.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0103.jpg
4MB, 4032x3024px
2/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 7
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.11.135096841
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:10:17 11:11:47
Exposure Time1/1153 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating20
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness9.4 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeSpot
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length3.99 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
File: IMG_0097.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0097.jpg
4MB, 4032x3024px
3/3

Took these yesterday on my iPhone 7.
as you can see, better than most DSLRs, maybe not 5D mark II though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 7
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.11.135096841
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:10:17 10:50:44
Exposure Time1/643 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating20
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness8.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length3.99 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2948894
here's your (you)
>>
>>2948913
What?
>>
>>2948914
>>2948913
>>
>>2941451

So what if you can focus? That shitty pixel noise drowns out anything that might be considered good about the image.
>>
File: fuckdsors.jpg (121KB, 783x511px) Image search: [Google]
fuckdsors.jpg
121KB, 783x511px
>>2948894

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 7
Camera SoftwareSnapseed 2.11.135096841
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:10:17 10:50:44
Exposure Time1/643 sec
F-Numberf/1.8
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating20
Lens Aperturef/1.8
Brightness8.8 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Auto
Focal Length3.99 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>2948894
I would be embarrassed to print this watercolor jpeg.
>>
because threads like >>2948766 show that they look like potatoes.
>>
>>2936752
I don't think you know how AdobeRGB<->sRGB colour space conversion works.
>>
>>2948890
>>2948891
>>2948894
READ THE STICKY
RESIZE YOUR SHIT
>>
>>2936683
>>2936676
It's cause we don't need instagram or smapchat filters to take good photos, we use manual controls and use our cameras for more than just vines and selfies.
>>2936842
The bokeh might look bad but at least you can get bokeh natively without the need for a secondary sensor and algorithms to calculate depth of field, not to mention I can see the blurred edges around the model in the iphone picture which makes the bokeh look fake like she was standing in front of a greenscreen
>>
File: 20160912_183120.jpg (5MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
20160912_183120.jpg
5MB, 4032x3024px
>>2936676
I have to agree with OP. Just sold my a7s and have a galaxy s7. No need for cameras anymore. No lenses needed. Already full frame.

Honestly guys you are just kidding yourself if you say other wise

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Makesamsung
Camera ModelSM-G930F
Camera SoftwareG930FXXS1APG3
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:09:12 18:31:20
Exposure Time1/302 sec
F-Numberf/1.7
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating40
Lens Aperturef/1.7
Brightness6.2 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length4.20 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width4032
Image Height3024
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Unique Image IDC12LLJB18VM C12LLJE03GM_
>>
>>2951049
If this isn't bait then I will personally fly to your house to bludgeon you with my film camera
>>
>>2936676
baitin huh
>>
>>2951059
Afraid it's not bait. It's time we realise. The famous quote - The best camera is the one you have with you.

I know now this guy was referring to yourge phone.
>>
>>2951049
this actually looks like a passable image that was overprocessed.
can't s7 shoot raw to fix that?
>>
>>2951118
I tend to think that saying only really applies to when you don't have the time to bring out more substantial equipment or you don't have it with you, if you have better gear on hand then don't ear it like an accessory while you use your phone
>>
>>2936817
post BW pls
>>
>>2951049
post better bait next time
Thread posts: 103
Thread images: 24


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.