Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: 20160903_184114.jpg (413KB, 1000x563px) Image search:
[Google]
413KB, 1000x563px
Anyone have fun playing with 110 film?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make samsung Camera Model SM-N910T3 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.2 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 31 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5312 Image Height 2988 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:09:03 19:10:53 F-Number f/2.2 Exposure Program Normal Program Lens Aperture f/2.2 Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Focal Length 4.60 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 563 Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Night Scene Unique Image ID H16ULHK02SA
>>
>>2916853
How did Kodak manage to sell that format? Even the 3x5's were shit.
>>
>>2916853
It's the best-worst film format in the history of photography. You can upskirt, but with aesthetic. IQ can vary depending on how you're digitizing/printing it but as long as you get the shot than you're good to go.
Minolta Zoom SLR, "circa" 2012.
>>2916870
>>2916881
Stop right there Pierre!
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 714 Image Height 1017 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>2917455
>sample looks worse than a 1mp phone camera
>"...as long as you get the shot than you're good to go."
kek
>>
File: m199910041.jpg (170KB, 360x384px) Image search:
[Google]
170KB, 360x384px
>>2916881
It made for tiny cameras that were dirt cheap. Quality didn't matter that much, these were used for the same kind of shit normies use smartphone cameras for now.
There were a ton of "toy" 110 cameras out there, too. They ranged from total toys that you'd buy out of a bin in a gift shop to cheap but serviceable P&S cameras. I think pretty much everybody my age (30) had one when they were a kid, and 90% of the time we'd run around pretending to take photos of things because our parents wouldn't pay for film.
Pic related, they literally sold this shit in toy stores, usually with some popular cartoon shit or whatever on it. I think I had one of these when I was little, although the one I really remember was a more "serious" looking Vivitar.
>>
File: kelloggs 110.png (117KB, 410x263px) Image search:
[Google]
117KB, 410x263px
Cornelius reporting in.
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4