Today I just got back into shooting people after a few months.

File: Untitled_219.jpg (1MB, 1408x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1408x2048px

>>2906897

EXIF?

>>2906897
She's pretty. Post more of her.

>>2906898
>poz
vile and disgusting, just like your white borders

>zone 6 highlights
>white borders

nah.

>>2906907
how are you analyzing images

File: Untitled_194.jpg (2MB, 1408x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1408x2048px

>>2906898

anyone can take pics of pretty girls
plenty of retards do it on instagram with great success

keep on going though

File: Untitled_1132.jpg (411KB, 1000x742px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1000x742px

>>2906921

>>2906900
I don't know why it's not showing but for the first picture at least...

> Canon 6D
> 1/60
> f/4
>ISO 100
>24mm - 105mm f/4

I'm going to sleep, if this is still alive in the morning I'll continue... too tired right now.

>>2906965
that sign is kind of distracting

I can tell it's trying to look like film without actually being film, ie vsco. not a fan of the vsco look desu

>>2906897
>white border thread
Grabbing my bucked of popcorn.

>>2906897
I'm liking this OP, keep on posting.

File: Untitled_41.jpg (2MB, 1408x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1408x2048px

>>2906965

I am back

>>2906897
Do you have instagram/500px/tumblr?

I really like your style.

>>2907047
I cannot comment about VSCO because I never really seen what those look like; the reason they look like film or that "I am trying to make it look like film" is because film respects complimentary colours & anyone who even briefly studies colour theory understands the importance of it.

>>2907427
I've been thinking of making a Tumblr. I do have Instagram but I don't feel like sharing it at this time, sorry.

>>2907474
>the reason they look like film

they don't.

>"I am trying to make it look like film"

you didn't.

>>2907498

Great job sherlock, you've discovered that he wasn't shooting film.

>>2906898
more of this
>>2906897
less of this.

>>2907503

the salt is strong lmao

>>2906897
reported to the fbi for terrorism.

>>2907340
goddamn, those fucking pants, holy shit, it's like something a person would wear if they had just lost over 100 pounds or something. Fucking Christ almighty, I want to take this bitch to Bloomingdales and get her fucking fixed up like a proper cunt, FFS, even octomom didn't wear that horrendous outfit and she had to shit out eight baby turdlets

>>2907474
>have Instagram but I don't feel like sharing it at this time, sorry.
quit playing hard to get, you fucking cockteaser.

>>2906965
this dumb bitch don't know if she wanna be a man, or a set of curtain drapes

>>2906921
Oh snap, this bitch looks like Leisure Suit Loretta, wearing a shit-colored bell bottom leisure suit from the 1970s. Is this skank high as fuck or what? Looks like she's about to nod off. Did you GHB that ho? Tell the truth, OP. I just noticed the skanky bitch sneaking around in the background here:
>>2907340
This what happens when you hire your models off Craigslist with the promise to pay crack for modeling time.

>>2907638
>>2907631
>>2907628

I've no idea what you're trying to say

File: Untitled_29.jpg (2MB, 1408x2048px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1408x2048px

>>2907340

those highlights though

goddamn.

Good shit, anon. Always nice to see good pictures on /p/.
>>2906897 has a Tichy feel to it

>>2906897
Lowered highlights and dutch angles aren't normally my thing, these look nice. Great work on the colors. Post more.

>>2907048
its not isi anon calmdown

>>2907716

The highlights are the worst part.

>>2907638
>>2907631
>>2907628
Do more pls

>>2906898
God that is some acne
Cool photos op, you have a kind of unique underexposed post processing
Maybe don't use exclusively white borders tho

>>2907628
>>2907631
>>2907638
>>2907720
unfunny samefag

>>2907655
This outfit look like a naked Nicki Minaj. Shit-colored brown with a big gaping hole in the front.

Really don't like what you did to the highlights, the borders exaggerate that even more. That's my only complaint really, otherwise the photos are great!

>>2907655
looks like a german ss officer

>>2907340
>>2906965
>>2906921
>>2906898
>>2906897
honestly probably the best photos i've seen on /p/ in years. I don't even know why I came to this board today but i'm glad I did

also, I would ask for your tumblr but I'm not suprised you won't give out information considering your only responses have been from that samefag retard who keeps making unfunny jokes and their clothes, a bunch of
>hurr white borders are u isi
>hurr ur pictures are technically underexposed

that said, there are some things you can work on:
1. that the pure white border looks unnatural. choose a lesser white or drop the border
2. if you're going into fashion photog or portraiture, you need to make sure that the lighting isn't too harsh for the skin.
on the close-ups you're unintentionally accentuating the acne, blemishes and dry-skin on their faces

File: 1378939648609.png (65KB, 250x221px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 250x221px

>>2907862
>honestly probably the best photos i've seen on /p/ in years.

>>2907903
its been nothing but garbage for a long time. feel free to dispute my claim by linking some garbage pictures of black and white old men with wrinkly faces or some "street" photography which is just some random people walking on the sidewalk with muh artsy film-filters applied. or maybe some of those lovely """"color-studies""""" or "I'm just testing my camera" shots?

>>2907938

How about I suggest you just lurk the fuck more, which you obviously need to do?

>>2907943
Stfu anon's right. This board has gone to shit.

>>2907956
>implying it hasn't always been shit

>>2907956

Truth.

This is the first thread I've seen in awhile, thats not "this is my first time shooting on my new DSLR'' or abunch of generic landscapes.

OP - Keep up the good work, post moar.

File: image.jpg (216KB, 688x1000px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 688x1000px

Hey guys, OP here. Thanks for all the actual real comments/opinions. I'm not currently on my computer but the series basically done. I'll post some of my other work for the time being. I really don't know why the EXIF isn't displaying tho

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	688
Image Height	1000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: image.jpg (71KB, 686x1000px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 686x1000px

>>2907990
I'll also reply to some of you guys & answer some questions later when I am able to type on a keyboard rather than my phone

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	686
Image Height	1000
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2907973

Again, lurk more.

>>2907990
how do you process these pictures? they're looking pretty good mayne

File: HK_2016.jpg (409KB, 688x1000px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 688x1000px

>>2907994
Taken in Hong Kong (irks me the focus is missed)

>>2908011
My process is a bit complex since it varies with the lighting and tone situation. A general rule of thumb I follow is to turn every picture black and white first and open a curves layer to adjust my tones and contrast (colour is distracting for me at this point so I nullify it). Then I delete my black and white layer and just fuck with the colours with complimentary colour in mind until I like it.

Really nice pictures, OP.
I guess you're not a full time photographer, so where do you get your models?

File: Untitled_140-Edit.jpg (2MB, 1702x2480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1702x2480px

>>2908016

>>2908017
Most of these people are actually my friends. It is my philosophy that any decent photographer can take a great picture of anyone regardless of how they look, I feel if you NEED a great looking person just to produce a good image then you're pretty amateur. Lately though I realized once your body of work stays consistent enough, you can ask anyone to model for you and they'll generally say yes. I hope that answers your question!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5DS
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2880
Image Height	4320
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:07:17 23:59:32
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1702
Image Height	2480
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2908023
Thanks! And how do you approach modeling on general?

>>2908023
why do you add a white border to your photos?

File: no_11.jpg (250KB, 686x1000px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 686x1000px

>>2908027
>how do you approach modeling?

I don't quite understand this question. You mean like how do I approach modeling agencies? A few of my local agencies approached me instead & truth is I never booked any models from agencies before...but if you are keen you just simply email them. Tell them you are interested in doing a test shoot with their "developing" models, the ones who lack a portfolio. If the agency likes your photos they'll give you a hollar (and yes it will be free).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5DS
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2880
Image Height	4320
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:06:07 18:42:33
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	686
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Annabella_03.jpg (2MB, 1697x2480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1697x2480px

>>2908036
Wither my reason is justified or not idk, but for me I feel the borders help "contain" the tones and colours from external elements like the background of a webpage or the particular browser you're on. It separates the edges of my photo so the tones & colour don't blend and extend past the image itself.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5DS
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2880
Image Height	4320
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:07:16 01:09:25
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/1.4
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1697
Image Height	2480
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2908044
should a amateur in photography add borders to their photos?

File: lol.png (46KB, 319x161px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 319x161px

>>2908045

holy fuck shut up.

>>2908044

white borders also help the viewer determine just how bad you're fucking up the post processing. ;)

File: _98A0108-Edit-Recovered copy.jpg (679KB, 1457x1000px) Image search: [Google]

679KB, 1457x1000px

>>2908045
Ultimately it's up to you, as the photographer, to decide how it's best to present your photos. Don't let the retard border nazi's on here tell you otherwise. Do what you think looks good & if you feel down the road it doesn't, then change your method. That's all there is to it - being an amateur has nothing to do with it.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5DS
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4320
Image Height	2880
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:07:16 18:43:47
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1457
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2908023
>It is my philosophy that any decent photographer can take a great picture of anyone regardless of how they look
is that your way of saying we need more fat hambeast models in runway fashion?

>>2908044
>>2908038
>>2908023
>>2908016
>>2907994
>>2907990
>>2906965
OP holds camera low and at crooked angle, as if he's shooting from the hip in creepshot mode. Then he puts a pretentious border on each image to pretend they don't all fucking suck balls.

>>2908056
glad to have you here with us, today

>>2908044
>muh centered focus portrait with centered subject
>>2908052
Ray Charles and Helen Keller could have composed this shit better. It's like you're totally clueless about composition.

File: Untitled_67.jpg (173KB, 1000x686px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1000x686px

>>2908047
My highlights are cooler because my midtones are warmer. That's how you correctly apply/utilize/balance complimentary colours into a photograph to suggest mood.

> just how bad you're fucking up
You sound really amateur. How long have you been taking photos & studying photography?

>>2908023
>>2908044
I like your attitude, and I agree with you about the borders. Keep it up friend, I enjoyed looking at these photos.

>>2908047
>>2908056
>>2908061
this toxic, baseless attitude is why almost nobody who actually knows jackshit about what he's doing it posting on this god forsaken board

>>2908063
>You sound really amateur. How long have you been taking photos & studying photography?

About twenty years.

I like how you're just spewing shallow, superficial tripe about the most basic split toning possible and trying to make it sound like you're some master artist.

Your base photos are fucked up, and then you try to cover up your total lack of technique with basic bitch instagram-tier processing, borders and a coy attitude.

Are you the guy that was posting pictures from a tennis court a year or two ago?

>>2908069
>toxic
reddit, pls go
inb4 problematic, literally, unironically

File: 0b4.jpg (35KB, 453x576px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 453x576px

>>2908072
>About twenty years.

File: Untitled_71.jpg (213KB, 1000x686px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1000x686px

>>2908056
>>2908061
Ironically it's you two who are clueless about composition. If you truly believe that the rules of composition is so static & believe professional shooters follow the same strict guidelines as you losers then I suggest throwing your camera in the trash and then yourselves.

A photograph is just information of lines, geometry, and story. If I can create better geometry, alignment of lines, and story by disregarding the conventional rules then I will. Deal with it nerd.

>>2908077
>>2908069
>>2908066
>>2908059
>>2908017
>>2908011
>>2907973
OP are you samefagging this thread?

>>2908069

I mean, you're welcome to believe that if you want to, but this board has always been "toxic", and there used to be a surfeit of talent around here. I've been here for nine or ten years and I'm pretty sure the attitude isn't the problem. This is 4chan, after all.

File: porta075.jpg (4MB, 3619x2542px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3619x2542px

>>2908072
>About twenty years.

OP here; HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH HOW HAVE YOU FUCKING DONE PHOTOGRAPHY FOR 20 YEARS AND NOT KNOW ABOUT THIS. HAVE YOU EVEN DISCOVERED WHAT A COLOUR WHEEL IS LOL

I was fucking 5 years old 20 years ago. Jesus christ, get a new hobby or actually start learning about your own before clueless commenting please.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3611
Image Height	2242
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	600 dpi
Vertical Resolution	600 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:14 23:39:12
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3619
Image Height	2542

>>2908072
If you've legitimately been shooting for 20 years, that means you're at least in your mid thirties.

If you're in your mid thirties and still using phrases like "basic bitch", you're a tool.

>>2908072
Yes because I am the only person in the world who had the idea of shooting in a tennis court, yeah that was me anon. Every tennis photo on the planet was taken by me. For my next shoot I'd like to take photos of me killing you in one too for saying something this dumb.

>>2908088

I'm 31. Thanks for playing, kiddo!

>>2908092
You've been shooting since you were 11...

And for the record, definitely a tool.

>>2908087
Acting like an immature child is always great while posting your own work. No matter how good or bad your pictures might be, all I can think of now is what an enormous idiot you are and how huch time you've spent on typing that all caps HAHAHA.
Are you expecting to be taken seriously by anyone?

>>2908082
>>2908069
>posts garbage
>gets called out
>proceeds to whine
>offers up feeble excuses for lack of skill and talent
>blames /p/ for "toxic attitudes"
>refuses to acknowledge he is an amateur and shit photographer wannabe
>anons point out more flaws in OP's photos
>OP butthurt increases
>"b-but I'm a professional shooter...rules don't apply to me, I'm special..>"
>lashes out at random anons, calls them "losers" and "tools"
all these OP tears born of incompetence and insecurity, mmm delicious

>>2908096

First camera was an old vivitar 110. Moved on to my mom's x370 when I was old enough to be trusted. Had one of those old pen cams that shot in something like 320x240 or MAYBE 640x480 for my first digital camera.

And, I mean, you can call me a tool all you want, but that doesn't disprove anything I've said, and just makes you sound like a sniveling little baby.

>>2908091
>For my next shoot I'd like to take photos of me killing you in one too for saying something this dumb.
LMFAO
this nigga trippin'
OP goin melt down and smash his computer in rage, then he gonna go make some more borders on whack photos and post that shit on IG talkin about he a professional photographer.

>>2908092
I never claimed I was a master at anything, I was simply replying to your super blunt comment with a super basic reply. What do you expect me to write a fucking essay each time a person decides to offer a incredibly bland remark on my photos?

>HURR DID U TENNIS FOTO 2 YEARS AGO TOO

I have complete archival memory of every tennis photo posted on /p/ few years ago & my answer is kill yourself lol.

>>2908099
Having a camera doesn't mean that you were learning anything or doing anything other than snapshitting, which is not "shooting for 20 years". That's like trying to get a job as a mechanic because you've changed your oil for two decades.

As for "disproving you" I couldn't possibly give less of a shit. Those aren't my photos, nor is anything in this thread a style or genre I remotely care about. The fact remains that you're still a pathetic shithead for attempting to appropriate instagram lingo while shitting on the instagram aesthetic. Gramps, you're no longer capable of being cool. Attempting to do so is just sad, not to mention rather hypocritical while appropriating one aspect of a scene while shitting on other aspects.

>>2908104

okay consumerist youth culture thank you for the lesson i will retire from internet posting because i am too old to keep up with you spry young kiddos ;)

>>2908091
>tennis court, yeah that was me anon...I'd like to take photos of me killing you in one too for saying something this dumb.
>>2908103
>tennis photo posted on /p/ few years ago & my answer is kill yourself
muh sides just passed Serena Williams
OP got triggered as fuq when anon called him out on his tennis court photos. rekt.

>>2908104
>Gramps, you're no longer capable of being cool.
OP still on a rant, I'm making more popcorn!

>>2908097
>Acting like an immature child is always great while posting your own work
>Are you expecting to be taken seriously by anyone?
>All these OP tears born of incompetence and insecurity
>OP goin melt down and smash his computer in rage

This is fucking /p/ lmfao; having the most autistic 31 year old poster who doesn't know about colour is the least of my concern.

>>2908107

So, wait, teach me about color again?

When I'm using the split toning tool in Instagram, I need to make my highlights cool if my shadows are warm? This is an fucking earth shaking insight, man. Don't let the word get out on this. Your highly specialized, very unique look will become totally generic if the masses find out about this pro tip.

What do I do if I want my highlights warm?

>>2908106
I'm not triggered; I just found it incredibly hilarious that he still recalled some generic photo years ago and the fact that he brought it up and expected I or anyone else had a clue what he was talking about just blows my mind. It's like saying "hey I don't like your photograph. Did you take the one with that tree few years ago because that was bad too"

Killing him was the only reply I could think of at that point like lmao what would you do in that situation what could you do???

>>2908113

So you admit your photos are generic?

>>2908116
>he still recalled some generic photo years ago
>So you admit your photos are generic?

Let's just say if you wash the cum out of your eyes you can you read the post correctly and b8 better ;^)))

It's amazing how people keep posting in the RPT's being like "these threads are this board's cancer, nobody posts critiques blah blah" and then when someone does make a thread you get this kind of shit show.

>>2908023
I remember seeing this one in the RPT a while back. I really like it, almost a giallo kind of feel to it. Some of the others are quite decent but this still stands out.

Please just power through this bullshit and post more if you've got them on hand.

>>2908122
>he still recalled some generic photo years ago
>and mistook it for mine

File: Untitled_41-Edit.jpg (250KB, 686x1000px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 686x1000px

>>2908126
It's understandable how he came to that conclusion with such poor knowledge of photography such as his. I'd be angry too if I shot for +20 years and still sucked.

>>2908125
I agree with some other anon above how the quality of post's fallen. I posted my Instagram a while back and did connect with some other really talented shooters and we discussed this a little. Back then the pictures I saw were more diverse and many of their approaches challenged mines in terms of how to shoot and composit. You were able to learn many things, but now majority of "criticism" just falls into the realm of "I don't like your style it is wrong, there is only 1 object way to photograph this". Because of that toxic mentality you don't get a whole lot of variety anymore. It hurts the beginners and more experienced shooters alike. That's my 2 cents anyways - cheers!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5DS
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2880
Image Height	4320
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:06:13 00:53:59
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	686
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

UNDEREXPOSED GOD DAMN I THOUGHT THAT MY LAPTOP SCREEN WAS DYING
ITS LIKE YOU SHOT IN APERTURE PRIORITY FOR CORRECT EXPOSURE AND THEN PULLED IT DOWN LMAO
THESE WHITE BORDERS LOOK LIKE SHIT
THIS ACNE LOOKS LIKE SHIT
THE SAMEFAGGING IN THIS THREAD IS OBVIOUS AS SHIT
SEND ME AN FB INVITE TO YOUR NEXT ZINE RELEASE LMAO

>>2908154
the only samefagging going on is you and some other retard(s) getting angry over someone getting better reception than your "test shot" of a cat that got ignored in the RPT.

fuck off

>>2908139

I like how quickly your facade dropped from Mr. Cool and Mysterious to rabid shitposter once you got called out. Stay red 100, homie.

>>2908154
The style's obviously meant to look underexposed; people aren't editing specifically to cater to your shitty vision. Sorry to break this to you.

>>2908175
This editing looks like it was done on a fucking iOS app it's so awful

>>2908087
Dayum, y ur pics suck so bad, nigga? Want me 2 give u some private lessons? How much money u got white boi?

>>2908165

These samefags r bitter after getting rejected by girls for their creepy photo projects and now they're out for blood.

>>2908098
the second post was me, not OP you dunce

I think your photos are fantastic, OP. I would love to know more about your process.

Ignore the haters!

File: stinkingshit01.jpg (125KB, 1400x1150px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1400x1150px

OP here, hope you guys are enjoying my body of work, rather, my oeuvre. In my opinion, a true artist can take a picture of anything and make it look good.

Here's another picture I took, I use the borders to "contain" my tones if you will and keep the rich colors from "spilling out" onto the rest of the page.

Also before you even bother commenting: how long have you been doing photography? You sound really amateur.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:22 14:16:18

>>2908791
>going through this much effort
holy fuck, just how mad are you?

>>2908800

>even responding

wow dude you must be really upset

stop giving white borders a bad rap shithead

>>2908791
Kek

>>2908791
>uninspired snapshit

>>2908791
U MAD BRUHHRR ?
HAHAH XD
>this mad

>>2908791
Only good photo in the thread

>>2906897
How do you get away from committing so much shootings? Are related to sam hyde

>>2906898
this is one of the most visually interesting photographs, I don't know if the green cast really adds or subtracts from the photo though.

File: bai bai.jpg (5KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 320x180px

>>2908052
Love the white+black juxaposition here, but
>>2908044
>>2908063
>>2908082

make me feel like you're not trying. Are the good shots flukes? Are the bad shots flukes?

File: brb sea.jpg (1MB, 4368x2912px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4368x2912px

hey /p/ can I get some C&C on this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:04:25 19:36:07
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/18.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	160
Lens Aperture	f/18.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2909923
yeah, should've jumped off that cliff

File: 1359506000279.png (19KB, 126x111px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 126x111px

>>2907340
>those pants

File: byrne.jpg (81KB, 620x620px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 620x620px

>>2909985

Her boss enforces a very strict dress code for the office.

File: 1368463827743.jpg (16KB, 300x198px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x198px

>>2909987
its not helping anyone at the office

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>2906897
Dude your pics are one of the best I've seen here for ages. Most of faggots here like to look down on others to make themselves feel better but all they ever shoot are "rule of thirded" snapshits of mud nobody gives a fuck about. Do your thing!