You'll never graduate art school and hang out with the

I like that pic

>>2905837
I'm desperate to find out how he got these colors/tones.
Aside from film choice, some photos have these irregularities along the edges that suggest a liquid was sitting on the film for some time
Or, perhaps it's all photoshop

File: after-before.jpg (988KB, 1023x1364px) Image search: [Google]

988KB, 1023x1364px

>>2905888
fuck it turns out it's photoshop/vsco/whatever

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1023
Image Height	682
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:18 18:37:00
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1023
Image Height	1364

>>2905888
>I'm desperate to find out how he got these colors/tones.
shooting outside looking in through green tinted glass
>Aside from film choice
These girls are only shot by the top fashion photographers on the very best tethered full frame DSLRs on a professional set with makeup, wardrobe, hair, craft services, and so on.
>irregularities along the edges that suggest a liquid was sitting on the film for some time
You're trying to read to much into it, those are reflections in the window and her skin pressed flat against the glass
>>2905893
>fuck it turns out it's photoshop/vsco/whatever
did you really think that this was film? That these were candids shot on the fly by some hipster nu-male and his collection of leftover film from the 1980s?

>>2905925
>These girls are only shot by the top fashion photographers on the very best tethered full frame DSLRs on a professional set with makeup, wardrobe, hair, craft services, and so on.
You're an idiot.

>>2905837
All of the editing is fucking rubbish. I stopped looking after the first 3-4 they were so cringy.

>>2905927
I second that.

>>2905837
some of the colors are really nice, and some of them are really garbage. The fake peeling shit on the edges just ruins all of them

>>2905837
>if anyone ever needed confirmation that pentacks is t. pleb

>>2905925
I'm 50% sure you're trolling but just in case
>shooting outside looking in through green tinted glass
I'm talking about the entire set, not just the posted image. And tinted glass alone obviously wouldn't produce this tone, I just think they've been edited nicely.

>These girls are only shot by the top fashion photographers on the very best tethered full frame DSLRs on a professional set with makeup, wardrobe, hair, craft services, and so on.
>did you really think that this was film? That these were candids shot on the fly by some hipster nu-male and his collection of leftover film from the 1980s?
Welcome to the new era of celebrity. you think these https://www.instagram.com/p/BJOdnF7BEei/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BJGH1UiBKy7/ etc were taken by a pro with a tethered full frame?
Regarding this particular set the article says:
>Tagging along was her friend, the young New York photographer Renell Medrano, a recent graduate of Parsons School of Design

>You're trying to read to much into it, those are reflections in the window and her skin pressed flat against the glass
obviously I didn't think the reflections and ass on the glass were irregularities in the processing. I was talking about other photos in the set like this one >>2905893 around the edge, there's a damaged film effect that's been photoshopped in.

>Spotmatic.

Good luck getting proper focus with micro prism.

>>2906365

i would rape your ass with my focusing skills in the spotmatic. if you are an eyecrippled cuck it doesnt mean everyone is.

File: images[1].jpg (8KB, 203x248px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 203x248px

>>2905927
>You're an idiot.
>>2905946
>I second that.
>>2905996
>you're trolling
Sorry to shatter the Hollywood illusion, but you're all a bunch of cucks for believing that these girls are frolicking around on a tropical beach taking candid snapshits to post on their IG and FB, when in reality, these girls have their photos carefully crafted and produced on a set by a fashion photographer and team of professional crew, e.g., wardrobe, hair, makeup, lighting, set designers, craft services, security, and the list goes on. Then the images are edited in post to look like snapshits before they're put on social media for cucks who like the queens of coal combustion.
But don't take my word for it...
http://samsonovasasha.com/
https://www.instagram.com/sashasamsonova/?hl=en
http://samsonova.tumblr.com/
http://www.teenvogue.com/story/sasha-samsonova-kylie-jenner-photographer
http://www.livincool.com/people/photographer-samsonova-sasha-interview-with-livincool-com
http://site.people.com/style/the-pro-files-meet-kylie-jenners-secret-weapon-25-year-old-photographer-sasha-samsonova/

File: 3521C1FD00000578-0-image-a-198_1465592443346[1].jpg (50KB, 634x397px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 634x397px

>>2906436
BTS shot

>>2905996
>you think (kylie jenner IG) taken by a pro with a tethered full frame?
google Sasha Samsonova

File: CO30noJWwAIMwEU[1].jpg (34KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x338px

this kid sells millions of dollars in merchandise every month, you think her handlers let her control her social media? Fact is she doesn't even fart unless she has the okay of her manager, her agent, her attorney, and a film crew on set to record it in all its epic glory.

File: kylie-jenner-bikini-600x750[1].jpg (167KB, 600x750px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 600x750px

>mua in background

File: kylie+jenner[1].jpg (69KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 640x640px

hair pros

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	640
Image Height	640

File: kylie-jenner-modeling-inline[1].jpg (57KB, 467x364px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 467x364px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: 34055DC700000578-3583634-image-a-61_1462913908044[1].jpg (43KB, 634x357px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 634x357px

>>2905996
>etc were taken by a pro with a tethered full frame?
yes, anon

>>2906436
>>2906437
obviously a lot of photos on her instagram are taken by a
>pro with a tethered full frame
but considering some photos are phone+mirror selfies it seems plausible that some others are taken casually by a celebrity friend or w/e.
and it also seems plausible that they invited photography student friend to tag along with a film camera.
but this is getting extremely far from my area of interest. I don't really give a shit about the kardashians, I don't really know that much about them.
my interest is in the linked article, cos I quite like how the photos have been edited

>>2906454
>seems plausible that some others are taken casually by a celebrity friend or w/e.
>seems plausible that they invited photography student friend to tag along with a film camera.
These girls don't have a "photography student friend", they have professional fashion photographers on their payroll who shoot for Vogue, Elle, etc. and an army of people from the fashion industry with tremendous experience. In their downtime, they wouldn't be caught dead hanging out with "photography students." They fuck nigger rappers, instead.

kendall is such a qt

>>2906465
if you say so.
as I've said, I don't really know that much about showbiz. I was just believing the text in the linked article

File: 1412781666860[1].png (70KB, 629x486px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 629x486px

>>2906469
Not exactly a student, this girl has at least six years of experience in NYC fashion photography, see resume

File: 982A0986[1].jpg (298KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 1600x1066px

>>2906469
this shit is all staged to look candid

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Photographer	RENELL
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1066

>>2906476

u finna tap shug?

>>2906534

I'm finna wreck that shit