i got into film photography a few months ago and i have a few shots i think are acceptable ( out of 7 rolls .. yeah i know that kinda sucks )
all of them have been developed at some local labs and scanned home with my a plustek 7200 i got for 40 bucks
i've lost some of the negatives so i can't always tell you what film i used but i can tell what camera/lens
(pic related is portra 400)
PS : i got a fuckton of particles and dust on my negatives because i'm fucking messy
2/18
3/18
4/18
5/18
6/18
7/18
>>2889071
woops forgot the picture
nah
8/18
9/18
10/18
11/18
12/18
13/18
14/18
15/18
16/18
18/18
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Color Space Information sRGB
>>2889113
thank you , the triple exposure should have been a double exposure actually , with just the journal page and the fire but i accidently exposed once more
>>2889085
this one is great
>>2889110
Fantastic.
>>2889110
ur bae is qt
>>2889064
>>2889066
>>2889068
>>2889074
>>2889078
>>2889080
>>2889085
>>2889093
>>2889100
>>2889107
>>2889108
Snapshitticus Maximus. Akin to what one might find in their mother or father's old photo albums. Just because you rocking those d33p tones doesn't mean these have any artistic merit.
>>2889110
>>2889065
>>2889063
>>2889059
Well executed portraiture. God i love portra.
>>2889089
>>2889091
>>2889092
Very nice, what b/w film are you using?
ITT snapshits
Just post in the general photo or film thread next time
Pro tip : dont listen to /p/ they'll only being you down
Nice pics for a beginner.
>>2889210
haha yes i did, thanks man , glad you loved it
>>2889246
The collage of them is just kinda comfy to look at
pretty neat photos m8, keep it up
>>2889246
can u post the collage(s) you did?
it is really comfy, thnx
>>2889281
Not op but here's the one I was talking about
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:27 20:31:31 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 2000 Image Height 1289
>>2889059
I'm sorry
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 960 Image Height 651 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:07:27 15:38:00 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 960 Image Height 651
>>2890836
i was like holy fuck how did i miss that in the op lol
>>2890836
>*gives 4Chan Gold*
>>2889063
nice, would've been even better if you turned to the right for a bit and got the trash can out of the frame
>>2889066
really cool, how did you shoot this?
>>2889085
awesome strong colours
>>2889110
lovely shot! she's really pretty too, must be nice having a cute girlfriend you can always take photos of...
>>2890836
YESSSSS!!!
are most of these shots iso 400 op?
there is a nice feel to your shots i feel i am missing as i have been shooting 200
>>2890836
OP here , i have to show her that pic, GOLD
>>2889110
>>2889110
Very very nice. I've been thinking about buying a film camera. What camera did you take this one with?
>>2892113
the camera doesnt matter so much, get any old fujifilm, canon or pentax etc
then buy some film, ISO 100 and 200 give good quality where as 400 will give a more grainy but 'vintage' effect
you also need to get your rolls developed and buy a half decent backlit flat bed scanner
>>2892123
op here , i second this
but for the info i used a xd5 minolta with the 50mm 1.7 lens
>>2892123
Accurate. But it will soon escalate.