Okay /p/
I'm having a dilemma. I cant settle on a good crop for this photo that makes the most of the (fairly shit) leading lines from the edges of the gardens. So I put it to you guys - how would you crop this image?
>>2886050
To add on to my op, I found a good crop in a 16:9 ratio but would prefer to keep the original 4:3 ratio pls
>>2886057
Thanks anon I hadnt thought of cropping that far in. I settled on this, and I am much happier with it. I appreciate your inout, helped a lot
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D700 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Photographer Jesse Wormald Photography Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 818 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 50 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:07:19 22:35:58 Exposure Time 1/1000 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
doggo in the bottom third
man and lamp post in top third
also crops out empty space with nothing of interest and draws the attention to the dog and man which are the main points of interest
i think this leads to a much better overall image, look up rule of thirds op, doesnt always apply of course but it is helpful a lot of the time
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:07:19 14:10:22 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 574 Image Height 429
>>2886066
Resize
>>2886050
>>2886075
this can be a pretty good photo, if youd pp it a bit better.
terrible photo, stop wasting your time trying to fix it