Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: Guttetur_Solvoren_16_0341 kopi-2.jpg (4MB, 6000x4000px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 6000x4000px
How can i make this photo more interesting? (I am new to photography)
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 804 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:07:18 19:00:22 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 6400 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 18.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>2885523
First things first: Read the fucking sticky you illiterate degenerate cunt.
Second, even though you are too fucking lazy to read a simple few words before posting, I'll give you some basic advice.
Photos are interesting because of the subject, not because of post processing. Processing can enhance a good photo, but it can't make a boring photo more interesting. You want your photos to be interesting? Take interesting photos.
>>
>>2885523
The artificial noise in this image is cancer-inducing
>>
>>2885535
I read the sticky and thought this was allowed? Im guessing "recent photo threads" are the proper place to ask for advice?
Thanks for yours, anyways. I'll keep it in mind.
>>
Maybe crop in tighter to make the erson your subject. Add clarity and dehaze. Also brighten the person using a radial filter. lastly, don't let the previous comment let you down, you will become good by posting and asking for feedback. Just ask for feedback from more prominent social feeds for photographers
>>
>>2885538
For fuck's sake you lazy shit stain. What's the first fucking line of the sticky?
>• Please post images that are JPG format, smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side.
>>
>>2885537
>ISO 6400
It's all too real
>>
File: 1467929939775.png (125KB, 302x187px) Image search:
[Google]
125KB, 302x187px
>>2885523
>using an ISO speed above 800 for a daytime shot
>>
>>2885816
what's wrong with that?
would you rather artificially add noise to achieve the effect?
>>
>>2885846
I'd rather avoid "achieving" the effect altogether because the "make your photos intentionally grainy" meme needs to die. In almost every case it just makes your photos look like fucking cancer.
>>
>>2885846
noise isn't appealing. film grain has some argument to it but there isn't much aesthetic value in deliberately blowing out your cameras sensor.
>>
>>2885535
Fucking this, this should be the first and last piece of advice on photography.
>>
>>2885537
>artificial
>iso 6400 w/that camera
uhh
>>
>>2885523
>6400 ISO
top kek, fucking knob gobbler
>>
>>2885846
Don't try to achieve that awful effect in the first place nigger.
You had a half-decent shot and intentionally ruined it for hipster points.
Thread posts: 16
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2