results of shooting my first roll of color film this was Kodacolor

File: IMG_0007.jpg (667KB, 1708x1128px) Image search: [Google]

667KB, 1708x1128px

when I took this I remembered an anon who asked something like
>do you take pictures on private properties? I wanted to last time but I didn't
and somebody answered
>jump that fence

so I didn't literally jump a fence but I followed second guy's advice
thanks for the advice man

File: IMG.jpg (515KB, 1696x1132px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 1696x1132px

I thought this would make a different picture before spending 5min walking in this damned 1m high grass

File: IMG_0003.jpg (543KB, 1136x1712px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 1136x1712px

here I thought it might have looked good if the girl was turned towards me, but I don't have enough social skills to call out random people in parks yet so this is what I got

File: IMG_0012.jpg (593KB, 1696x1124px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 1696x1124px

see I got to this place because a girl told me she would have been my guide for the day, so I would see the nice looking spots to take pics, but when I got there she told me via text message that she wasn't available, and she only mentioned some interesting spots

File: IMG_0013.jpg (468KB, 1532x1128px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1532x1128px

so I opened up the navigator on my phone and found my way around the town
was a nice enough looking town to be honest

File: IMG_0015.jpg (499KB, 1708x1136px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 1708x1136px

and I was lucky since there was a market
I really like markets for some reason, don't really know what exactly

File: IMG_0008.jpg (509KB, 1424x1136px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 1424x1136px

I had read this film had a red tint
boy was that wrong

I wanted to take this pic months ago, but at the time I was there with a 70-200mm lens
was pretty satisfying

File: IMG_0010.jpg (431KB, 1689x1103px) Image search: [Google]

431KB, 1689x1103px

>>2879856
this pic here, sorry

File: IMG_0020.jpg (306KB, 1680x1128px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1680x1128px

I don't remember what was in the shaker, just that I tried to replicate some pics I saw on instagram
those filters don't even come close to mine :^)

File: IMG_0022.jpg (281KB, 1708x1136px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1708x1136px

I tried to center the tower in a hole better, but the viewfinder position didn't help

File: IMG_0017.jpg (459KB, 1686x1102px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 1686x1102px

here I went into this train station to document its decadence
being there in the empty rooms doesn't really flow from these pics, but still they do give away some of the feeling

File: IMG_0030.jpg (273KB, 1708x1148px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1708x1148px

right after this was shot, at a charity diner, I thought it would have come out with the guys figures in the middle, but instead this effect came out
can't say I'm unhappy about it

File: IMG_0024.jpg (121KB, 1572x1144px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1572x1144px

I told the fucker to be still, this is the best he could do

File: IMG_0032.jpg (791KB, 1680x1132px) Image search: [Google]

791KB, 1680x1132px

near a pool, with harsh light

File: IMG_0039.jpg (534KB, 1708x1132px) Image search: [Google]

534KB, 1708x1132px

same pool, same light, view through the ladder

File: IMG_0037.jpg (440KB, 1708x1128px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1708x1128px

I for my life can't take a still self portrait with this shit

File: IMG_0035.jpg (509KB, 1140x1708px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 1140x1708px

>looks strange, I've taken 39pics with this roll
>seriously? there might be something wrong with how you loaded it
>yeah, let's try and see if I can take more pictures with it

File: IMG_0033.jpg (417KB, 1708x1136px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 1708x1136px

and now for the abstract stuff

view of a translucent window at my school, circa 9AM

File: IMG_0034.jpg (701KB, 1684x1100px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 1684x1100px

and last but not least, pic related
whatever it is

hope you enjoyed it everybody

>>2879839
Overall I enjoyed the images. The lo-fi look works well IMO, or it could just be that I have a fetish for it. Your first 3 images are my favorite, along with >>2879862 and >>2879872 .

Thanks for sharing, just another bit of motivation I need to get into film photography. Looking to get a medium format, possibly a pentacon 6.

It's not the film. Either you have shit camera or scanner.

Anyway I like the feel in your snapshits.

>>2879944
its the scanner... if your lens was soft you would still see sharp grain structure. but the grains (and even the dust on the negatives) is soft

These are all shit dude. Stop relying on the film aesthetic to turn photos of boring nothingness into some interesting, nostalgic bullshit. Would you have taken these had you been shooting with a digital camera? Probably not...

File: IMAGE0025.jpg (412KB, 1080x716px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 1080x716px

For reference here's Kodacolor 200 scanned properly. Not too badd for 2.50/roll.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:09 23:16:57
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2879897
>Thanks for sharing, just another bit of motivation I need to get into film photography.
my pleasure m8
>>2880027
>>2880053
ah, well good to know, I'll look into a solution for that, thanks
>>2880051
>These are all shit dude.
would you be so kind as to elaborate on why they're shit?
please do not just repeat they're "boring nothingness" and do elaborate instead

>>2879846
Much inspiration

>>2880144
Not that guy but here's my take on it.

Sometimes I load a 36 exp roll of Portra 160, I shoot what I need and I got three shots left. It's a new day and I need to load a different roll. So I find some stuff, anything. I focus half-assedly and take a shot. Just to feel like I'm not "wasting the roll".

That's what these shots remind me of. My snapshits of beer bottles.

>>2880375
This. You just aren't layering, or maybe more accurately your photo have too many layers. The composition of these shots doesn't isolate any of your subjects and neither does your choice of depth of field. Think about the background details.

The best one is the pole on an angle but you should have taken a step right to take the house out of frame.

Sorry to be harsh discount Jesus, just practice

Film is very sensitive to UV. Add a UV filter