Was playing with lens, took a picture of the corner of a pillow.

>>2862090
Now bite it fag

File: DSC_0439-23.jpg (632KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

632KB, 750x1000px

>>2862099
topkek
>>2862090
congrats, you have discovered that subject is not the only thing that can make a picture worth taking, just don't go off the deep end with endless pictures of "texture" and "lines"

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	326 dpi
Vertical Resolution	326 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:01 21:31:20

>>2862102
your photo is shit

>>2862154
yeah, its definitely pretty bad technically speaking. But whatevs

>>2862090
>98% of image is out of focus
this meme needs to die
>ISO 1000
that's why it's grainy and noisy, OP

>>2862164
"Was playing with lens..." wasn't composing a photo. I guess no one else has interesting pictures of stuff when they were just testing their equipment? Accidental nice pictures?

>>2862194
We all take those photos, but literally no successful photographer falls in love with those photos. Being surprised by how much you like a photo like this shows that you're surprised by the output of your camera, and in love with unexpected properties of light and bokeh.

Light is a tool. Depth of field is a way of looking at things. Contrast is a tool.

You've bought a new hammer, pounded a bunch of nails into a board to try it out, and then showed that board with nails in it to your local wood-working club saying "I don't know, I just really like now this project turned out"

>>2862197
Yeah, exactly.

File: Nothing.jpg (205KB, 1684x1024px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1684x1024px

Woke up 3 months ago

Found some anthropomorphic figure laying in the bed near mine
Got my cam
Shot the thing

Just a piece of tissus: nothing good
Everything eaten by the mess in the background
Got rid of most background and add gradient fill
Still not good.


Found the OP picture: really like it; powerfull shape
Also not a shitty resolution. Thanks OP
Can I use it to have it shining ?


Went back to my picture. Paint it a little bit to fix the shape
Not so good than the one from OP but a fair nothing.

Everything is nothing anyway :=)

File: 2016-06-16 09.58.01.jpg (2MB, 1712x2285px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1712x2285px

>>2864261
Anyone told you that you're a schizo?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: schizophrenia_50pc.jpg (373KB, 1183x627px) Image search: [Google]

373KB, 1183x627px

>>2864362

Sure You are only the last

>>2862197
Bullshit. Taking test photos you are not necessarily aware of what you are shooting because your attention is fixed elsewhere. Then you might get surprised by what the actual photo ends up looking like.

Like buying a new hammer, trying it quite blindly on some bench you're building, be immersed in how good quality hammer it is and then later find out all the nails you banged hit just the right places intuitively even tho you weren't paying attention.
In the end I agree tho that most these photos lack something to make an actually working composition. Once in a while they turn out great. The end result is>>2862090
an art form, not mathematics

File: _DSC0122.jpg (567KB, 680x1020px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 680x1020px

hey i took a photo of a pillow too.