Hey gang! I'm craving some criticism. Please tell me how

...is this the only one?

>>2836381
He probably had a heart attack. No one makes a new thread for posting only one photo! :^)

>>2836319

That's a nice moment, and it's great that the woman's hand (which really makes the shot) is silhouetted against a darker gray. Maybe tighten up the crop to a traditional 3:2 or even a 4:5 ratio... I think there's too much of nothing going on in the left 2/3s of the frame.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (139KB, 662x334px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 662x334px

>>2836456
>I think there's too much of nothing going on in the left 2/3s of the frame.
I wouldn't say that. It's just like the left 2/3s is an independent scene which does not connect to those people. Note that everything points to the left, there's nothing guiding to the right.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:12 09:49:01
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	662
Image Height	334

File: Untitled-2.jpg (190KB, 1000x334px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1000x334px

With >>2837045 I realized the Z shape became much more prominent, which of course guides to the right.
However, I did not manage to push more attention to the people as in the crop attached on this.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:12 09:49:05
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	334

>>2837050
Especially I did not manage to crop a substantive scene which just connects the people to the buildings where she's pointing at.

>>2836319
In the original crop, the gangplank has too much weight, it even belabors the point of this shot.

File: DSCF3813-3.jpg (276KB, 1000x549px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1000x549px

Here's an alternate shot from the same scene. I think this one works a lot better.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T1
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:13 12:20:53
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Brightness	3.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2836319
>Please tell me how shit my street photography is.
It would be better if you actually moved from this spot or at least had more than one subject in this spot.

It's just the same picture over and over.

That said, I like it better than any shot I've ever taken.

>>2837804
I like this the most. Their are some decent elements in the composition. I wish that the people stood out a bit more. Stark figure-ground contrast often works in street photos.