I bought a phantom the other day. What do you think of my photos?

>>2799316
These are very nice.

First off, read the sticky and resize your shit damnit

>>2799316
The vignetting is horrid mate. Subtle vignetting looks okay, but you went overboard here. Subject and composition is nice though. Ease up on the saturation a bit

>>2799318
Again, too much vignetting. There's alot of crushed blacks, try avoiding that when processing. I like the contrast though, not much else to say

>>2799328
Meh

>>2799332
See above

>>2799341
Are there laws on how close you're allowed to fly near the city? If not, get way closer and take some sweet skyline shots

Overall these shots are pretty average, I'm a sucker for aerial photography but none of these appeal to me. Post processing needs some work, go easy on the vignetting and be careful not to crush the shadows/blacks

Oh and fix your offset horizon, all these shots are crooked.

Like you said you're new to aerial photography, so you're obviously going to get better with practice and time. Try looking for more interesting subjects, and have a go at facing the camera directly down towards the ground, you'll find all new compositions that you didn't see before.

File: DJI_0014.jpg (3MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2048x1152px

>>2799352
I recalibrated the camera so the shots should be a bit straighter and am concentrating less on vignetting. I can't think of a good subject though. Anyway, let's see if I've improved.

File: DJI_0035.jpg (3MB, 2048x1150px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2048x1150px

>>2800162
samefagging, horrible iso. Can't do manual exposure on the drone though which is a shame.

>>2799316
use flat profile.

>>2799358
> Muh crushed blacks
You are just a retarted faggot.
Have you ever even Seen pictures of good printers? You will find 100% Black in nearly all of them.

>>2799316
Hey I recognise this cross. Always wondered what it looked like up close.

File: DJI_0083.jpg (821KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

821KB, 1000x562px

>>2800244
Fellow Aussie?

File: DJI_0014a.jpg (607KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 1000x563px

Not really happy with how blue this pic looks.

>>2799358
>First off, read the sticky and resize your shit damnit

stop crying. he doesn't have to resize anything.

>>2799316
wait for better lighting or rain or something to make your images more interesting

>>2802967
Fuck off you ignorant cunt.

should make it 1000 pixel maximum so its easier to see and load.

I'd like to get a quadcopter setup which can operate a fuji x70 or something, that would be sick

I've got a P3P, photos from it are dog turd.

Same shitty 4k sensor as the GoPro hero4. Wouldn't even bother mate.

File: Untitled_HDR2.jpg (711KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 1000x562px

hdr looks a bit like poo

>>2802985
you can mount a gimbal which can hold the x70 on a large enough quad, then connect to the x70 with your phone to change it's settings and take pictures

>>2803083
>then connect to the x70 with your phone to change it's settings and take pictures
Yeah, enjoy your 15 meters of range.

>>2799341
What city is this?
I want to live there.

>>2803083
or just set it to auto and use radio triggers

>>2803241
Melbourne.

>>2803285
Why the fuck would anyone do that?

File: Untitled_Panorama1.jpg (4MB, 1618x2048px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1618x2048px

Is there a better way to stitch vertical panos? So much fisheye.

File: DJI_0021.jpg (621KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 1000x563px

I quite like this one.