So I just started photography and took these pictures the other

File: IMG_0205.jpg (954KB, 1536x1024px) Image search: [Google]

954KB, 1536x1024px

Also ITT post your favourite pics and/or most recent pics you took

>>2717785
Recent potato bread is this way >>2717203

>>2717786
Oh okay thanks. Didn't see it

>>2717783
photos r decent, but u better give it up anyway.
photography is dead.

I like your photos, a lot better than when I just started, keep it up dude, seems like you live in a cool place to shoot.

>>2717783
It's aiight
>>2717784
Under exposed. To dark. Also boring subject.

File: 1440079524307.jpg (71KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 960x640px

>>2717784
Is this you?

I'm guessing you have a nice camera and were graced with a dark day sort of moody day.

Apart from the photos having nice colors, they are quite boring:

>>2717783
This is just as bad as the close up of a flower photos. Just because the water is in focus and the background is all blurry doesn't make it good. The two blurry lights in the background aren't helping either.

>>2717784
It's a fucking close up of a coffee cup. I'm guessing you were graced with a macro lens for your birthday?

>>2717785
Could have done so many things with that fog but instead you took a photo of a boring street with a trash can at the end of it.

File: 034 - smaller.jpg (1MB, 1536x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1536x1024px

Also just started. Any thoughts?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 600D
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.2
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:13 19:02:57
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Manual
Lens Aperture	f/4.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1536
Image Height	1024
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	One-Shot
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	160
Color Matrix	129

File: IMG_6886 - small.jpg (1MB, 1536x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1536x1024px

another

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 600D
Lens Size	18.00 - 55.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.0.2
Lens Name	EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS II
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:13 19:04:51
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Manual
Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	43.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1536
Image Height	1024
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Manual
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	Manual
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	320
Color Matrix	129

>>2720666
>>2720667
My bad didn't read through fully, will post these in recent photo thread.

>>2720666
I would have stopped down more and shot at a lower shutter speed. it's also a bit underexposed but it's still nice.

>>2720667
very weak. bar in middle is not pleasing.

>>2719248
ur parents maybe. think before you talk .. SMILEY

>>2717783
>>2717784
>>2720667
i hate photos of nothing

>>2717785
Best of the bunch, but that isn't saying much. No offense, OP, but you have a long road ahead of you.

>>2720666
Not bad.

>>2720667
>what is rule of thirds

File: logos nuevos DEFINITIVO.jpg (102KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1280x800px

Nice picture

pretty atmospheric but boring
there's potential my little friend

File: 2015-12-12 08.06.40 1.jpg (3MB, 1836x3264px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1836x3264px

Is this a good picture?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SM-N910G
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Equipment Make	samsung
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2015:12:07 10:11:19
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.2
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Light Source	Unknown
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1836
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Program	Normal Program
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	3264
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	7.2 EV
ISO Speed Rating	40
Exposure Time	1/432 sec

>>2721546
>Toxic colors
>Soft and noisy as fuck
>Flower subject

What do you think?

>>2721550

Anyway I can improve the picture?

>>2721552
Make it smaller when posting it here or people will 'pixel peep'. Otherwise you seem to be using a fablet to photograph so there's not a lot I can say. Avoid using an overcast sky as a background.

>>2721566

I don't know how to make that sky seem less like a white background. It seems on every smartphone that I take photos with, I either get the skies to look right and the subject becomes very dark, or the subject becomes clear and the sky becomes a white background.

requesting the learning curve image for OP

>>2721583
/p/ newfag second this plz

>>2721579
congrats, you've found the limitations of your tablet camera. either buy gear that can fix this problem (I strongly advise against this) or read on composition and how to mitigate this issue

>>2717783
>>2717784
>>2717785
So edgy.

>>/rpt/

File: 2015-12-12 08.36.46 1.jpg (4MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x1836px

>>2722192

It sucks though. I'm happier with this pic because the sky is still visible. But for super bright skies, my phone just doesn't cut.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	SM-N910G
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Equipment Make	samsung
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2015:12:09 13:27:16
Image Width	3264
Image Height	1836
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.2
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Light Source	Unknown
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	1836
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Program	Normal Program
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	3264
Metering Mode	Average
Flash	No Flash
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	8.8 EV
ISO Speed Rating	40
Exposure Time	1/1328 sec

>>2722395
perth?

>>2722417

Yeap. Pretty cool place to take photos. I kind of regret not buying a decent camera before going though, but I guess that trip made me realize the limitations of a phone camera.

File: DISLIKE.jpg (26KB, 454x254px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 454x254px

>>2717783

>Not following size rules
>Making a new thread for this shit

>>2721546

>Not within size rules
>Background is physically painful to look at
>Literally nothing is in focus