Hey /p/ I'm interested in hearing your opinions on these

File: rest 1.jpg (128KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 533x800px

The next two photos are the same just taken from different angles, I'm interested in what you guys think is the better of the two.

1

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:07 22:42:25
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3744
Image Height	5616
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: rest 2.jpg (126KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 533x800px

2

Give it too me straight /p/... How shit is it?

I really appreciate constructive criticism

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:07 22:42:27
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3744
Image Height	5616
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

what exactly are you trying to get across with these photos? was there any intent or thought process?

>>2699595
I don't know, I just think it looks sad. Both photos were kinda something I saw and just took a snap at. It sadly looks like generic "street photos" to me, but I still kinda like them

I took them on a trip to Singapore and thought it looked sad seeing lower class people in an otherwise wealthy city.

File: Sleep.jpg (152KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 533x800px

Also this one if anybody would like to critique.

Do you guys think they're nice enough to work on?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer 6.1.7600.16385
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:07 22:21:55
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3744
Image Height	5616
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2699592
>>2699594
I'm probably going to get skewered by /p/ but I'd like to see this in B&W with the contrast turned up.

Typically with street photography unless color is playing a large role (because you want it to as opposed to it being distracting) you want to shoot in B&W. Try gray-scaling the images and see if you like them better that way.

>>2699604
Yeah, I was thinking about making them black and white.

I don't like to shoot photos with baked black and white though, I like being able to have both instead of having it baked.
I use channel mixer for making black and white.

I'm curious, which of the two shots do you prefer? I like the first one, but she's not obscured in the second shot.

>>2699590
Really like this one, others are meh. Some dodge/burn and I'd have this on my wall

You called them boring snapshits.
You asked if it was worth the work.
You answered your own question.

>>2699870
Thanks, I appreciate it! I'll give it a go with that one.

>>2699916
Thanks for being straight with me, that's what I want to hear.