so what are the laws regarding carrying firearms and shooting

>>943601
You can do it as long as you follow relevant safety and don't shoot people. If you're going to hunt make sure you follow your state hunting laws and that you use a legal caliber (some states ban certain calibers for hunting). That's pretty much it.

In general the NF rules for firearms are as follows.

Shoot against an adequate backstop
Do not shoot over roads, trails or rivers or lakes.
Do not shoot near trailheads, buildings, parking areas or developed campgrounds.
If a NF has an established firing range (and some do) it is preferred that you use it instead of making your own.

That's the GENERAL set of rules, specific areas may have other rules. The best bet is to call or the the district office and ask the rangers.

National Forrest rules are:
Don't shoot over highways, trails or their ajacent waterways.
Don't shoot within 150 feet/yards (can't remember) of a camp ground or dispersed campsite
Don't shoot without a backstop

Unfortunately states like to dump their own fucking rules on top of it (West US has a fuckton of fire laws you'll have to google). Consult the internet about the specific spot you're about to walk into.

>>943601
Laws regarding the possession and use of weapons are set by the states.
For example, in my state, I can walk down the street with a Vaquero on my hip and an AK over my shoulder. Sam as in the USNF here.
However, to carry a J Frame Iin my pocket, I need. Concealed weapons permit.

Call the field unit at the USFS you are going to visit. Ask the land manager instead of trusting a bag of dicks on a Norwegian Knot tying imageboard

>>943746
>last paragraph, thank you

Asking the internet anything.
>Trust know one.

File: 1466796505693.jpg (63KB, 460x656px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 460x656px

>>943601
Heres a good idea:
Call the forest ranger station and ask them youself

>>943601

>inawoods
>AR

Stop playing Rambo and at least take the right tool for the job.

File: gunslukovich.jpg (36KB, 472x342px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 472x342px

>>943601
>Assault rife innawoods

You most likely also carry a pistol in a tactical fashioned holster and wear a tactical vest on camping trips.

Do you think you're going to get into a firefight with some deer?

I don't understand these people who get all tactical about everything they do. Why pretend to be a special forces guy from a video game? It just looks stupid.

Pls go back to looking at Budk catalogs.

>>944028
The AR platform is a fantastic platform for any use. You can literally do anything with it. I dont understand why people hate on them so much.

>>944302

It's a bit like having a smartphone: It does everything okay, but Garmin make better satnavs, Kodak make better cameras and IBM make better portable computers. If you need a hunting rifle then get a Moist Nugget. It's cheaper than most ARs and better innawoods. Neither one is any good for predator defence - Carry bear spray anyway.

>>944028
>AR-15
>assault rifle

well its a good thing you made yourself look retarded on the first few words so i didnt have to bother reading the rest, thanks for that at least.

heres your (you)

File: 1290114526063.jpg (37KB, 500x571px)

37KB, 500x571px

>>944362
>If you need a hunting rifle then get a Moist Nugget.
>It's cheaper than most ARs and better innawoods.
>Neither one is any good for predator defence

>>944362
Garmin make better satnavs, Kodak make better cameras and IBM make better portable computers
Holy shit, what year is this? Garmin, maybe. But Kodak doesn't fucking exist outside of retail store digital photo printing booths, and IBM stopped caring about consumer computers over 10 years ago, only making components and supercomputers.

File: 1484208737058.jpg (83KB, 983x545px)

83KB, 983x545px

>>944362
>need a hunting rifle
>meme nugget

Yeah, no. I have 2 ('27 and '37) and never take them hunting. There are much better options including the AR platform (which I don't own).

>predator defense

Bolt action - nope. AR in .308 - yep. If you're really concerned with predators, then get a .44 magnum to carry with your larger caliber semi-auto rifle.

>>944393
Alright I'm aware that an AR-15 is not an assault rifle by definition but 99% of people think of either an AR-15 variant or a Kalashnikov rifle when they hear the term "assault rifle". My point got across anyway. Just for having a semi-automatic rifle innawoods, OP is most likely one of those people who likes to play pretend soldier, try to get something close to an assault rifle, and use it in the same way as one.

But way to go, you were able to nitpick definitions that don't make a difference to 99% of people OR the validity of my criticism. Good job, guy.

>>944302
Its not that I hate it. Its that people tend to make them as tactical as possible to get as close to a military weapon as they can even though somebody immature enough to play pretend soldier with a deadly weapon for fun is not likely responsible enough to have such a deadly weapon.

If somebody wants to go to a shooting range, sure do whatever you want, take whatever you want, wear a tac-vest, sunglasses, and baseball cap.

If you go innawoods, there's no reasonable justification for having a semi-automatic weapon other than it looks 'cool'.

Would you trust any regular jackoff you see in the street to be carrying such a weapon hiking near you? I wouldn't.

>>944654
An AR15 is adequate for wildlife defense.

Go fuck yourself you liberal cunt.

>>944654
>tacticool
>more deadly somehow
>this is what the left believes

My .22 is semi-automatic. I use it for squirrel hunting. I have a 30-06 that's semi-automatic. I use it for deer hunting.

>>944362
SKS
K
S

>>944362
>defence

leaf, yuropoor or bong detected. You don't know shit about guns

>>944654
Silly faggot. Ar-15 is a great rifle for feral pig.

File: 8xellwi2.jpg (958KB, 1920x2560px)

958KB, 1920x2560px

>>944654
>Why do you NEED to play soldier?!?!?
>Why do you NEED that instead of a durr rifle?!?!?
>Why would you take a rifle into the one place you might actually need one?!?!?

It's not 1972 anymore, rifles have progressed and it's none of your business what people want to take or why.

Get fugged commie.

>>944654
There's no reasonable justification for being innawoods besides it's "cool." People who go innawoods just want to play survivor and get as close to being some Cro-Magnon hunter as possible. We're so much better and more enlightened now and I don't think anyone should go do things they like because it hurts my delicate feelings.

Bitch.

>>944432

>thinking you'll have the wits to aim and fire while a bear is trying to eat your balls
>not taking a can of spray and pray instead

Did I say spray and pray? Sorry, bear spray is better than praying, because bear spray actually works.

File: I+can+t+let+anyone+impose+on+muh+freedoms+hank+_021ea6374d21c4cbdbd86ef86721c27f.jpg (42KB, 710x540px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 710x540px

>>944946
Public land is a communal resource so yes it is my business to care if there's somebody lurking around aching to shoot anything that moves with a semi-automatic rifle while I'm enjoying dirt and trees and shit. Take a regular gun like a reasonable person. Take your tactical shit to private property.

The point I made but it seems you missed is not that people should not be allowed to have these weapons innawoods because the weapon itself is dangerous. People should be criticized for taking them innawoods because the people are dangerous, not the guns. If somebody is.. blah blah blah immature enough to play pretend soldier... blah blah they're likely not responsible enough to have such overkill.

To further explain, the idea that everybody should have the freedoms to do this is based on classical liberalism and relies on the belief that man is inherently rational and reasonable enough to make responsible and conscious decisions. However, by being so immature as to play soldier like a child but with a real semi-automatic weapon, one demonstrates that they are not responsible and rational enough to be trusted with such freedoms. Therefore there has to be some limit to these freedoms, a limit prescribed by the level of maturity shown by the average user of such freedoms. One is not either a fascist or a commie for being slightly to one side of your opinion. Everybody is somewhere along this spectrum that balances freedom with collective responsibility. You're on a different kind of spectrum I suspect. Nigger.

>>944967
You should be allowed to do it but you're not immune from people calling you a childish faggot and discouraging similar irresponsibility. Does it hurt your feelings?

Its like carrying a katana and wearing a trench-coat and fedora around town. You shouldn't be banned from doing it but you're still a massive weeb faggot.

Faggot.

Maybe this + >>945060
sounds a bit confusing.

I value freedom enough that you should be allowed to carry a whatever you want but I also think its just childish and irresponsible to exploit some of those freedoms in certain circumstances. This doesn't mean they should be restricted, rather that I should call those people out on their faggotry.

Its like free-speech. Should people be banned from shouting "Death to niggers" on the streets? No. But other people retain the right to criticize them and discourage similar behavior.


Gettin heated boys

>Yanks can take guns hunting in public areas
I don't want our guns laws to change but boy would that be fun as fuck to do. Take my usual gear plus a rifle and some ammo and stalk shit for food. Sounds comfy.

>>945090
It's comfy because it changes the whole dynamic of the great outdoors. You go from a simple wanderer to a conqueror of nature.

File: 20170129_121102.jpg (2MB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1920px

>>945060
>because the weapon itself is dangerous

I can already tell you have zero military or firearm experience, so let me break this down for you, nigger.

My AR or AK is no more dangerous than a common deer rifle, in fact it's less dangerous and fires a massively fucking smaller round that has a significantly less amount of power, if I shoot you with a .30-06 or .308 you're likely dead or losing a limb, if I shoot you with 5.56x45 or 7.62x39 you have a better chance of just going to a hospital and recovering. Don't believe me? Google it, maybe you'll get something through that thick fucking skull of yours but I highly doubt it.

And besides, I'm not taking a rifle into a national park to "play soldier", paint my face up, wander around in full fatigues pretending the taliban has invaded my Wyoming backyard, I'm carrying it for self defense against bears, wolves and meth tweakers, I'm assuming a dumb city cunt like you probably doesn't have those or you're one of those idiot fucks who thinks mace will stop a 1,200lb brown bear bent on eating your face.

I've used 7.62x39 against bears since 2006 and 5.56x45 against wolves and coyotes with great results and they're both massively cheaper than .30-06, .308 or .243, any idiot who buys into the mace meme should do the world a favor and kill themselves before even heading into the woods.

Also, inanimate objects aren't going to randomly start spraying lead into your boypussy without a pair of hands doing it for them, don't be a total fucking retard.

In short, I'll carry whatever I want and if pussy fucks like you don't like it you can be on your way to your gender studies group at the local libtard university to talk about how bad you got triggered today on an Icelandic leather pants collector bulletin board with all the other SJW trash that buy into this "classic liberal" line of garbage you're spewing. Fuck you and have a shit day.

>>945125
You know that post was pretty top notch until you spouted all the ad hominem shit.

>>945128
Sorry, I was in the navy for years lol

>>945131
No worries mate, makes sense.

>>945125
>reading something wrong and getting that upset about it

I worded the sentence poorly but it nonetheless says this is NOT my point.

I said the people behind the guns are dangerous, not the guns themselves. Dumbass.

I can tell you didn't even read past the first sentence of that part anyway, if you did you would realize how goddamn stupid your comment is.

Are you proud of yourself that you spent all that time making an assertion in my place and then arguing against it?

>don't be a total fucking retard
ironic as fuck

Also how the fuck is classical liberalism an SJW line of garbage? Its the opposite of SJW because it holds that I can say "Death to niggers" if I want despite other people's feelings.

I never said anything either way about mace. Guns are superior to mace, hooray I conceded to your superior logic fucking nig nog.

How many fucking bears and wolves are you shooting in self defense that price is that important?

>5.56x45 works well against coyotes, therefore its the only option even relevant and nothing can even match it

>>945179
>Basing assumptions on peoples possessions and what they do with them

My bad, you're just a total fucking retard

>>945125
regarding
l
v
>>945179

Now I feel a little bad for calling you a dumbass b/c we've all been in this situation and had it blown up in our faces. Just read the full comment.

>>945185
Oh man now I don't feel so bad. You just can't turn 'being a dick' off.

If I find gay porn and a dildo in somebodies room, its reasonable to assume their homosexual.

Tacticool weapon + pretend soldier innawoods = acts like a child = probably not responsible enough to have tacticool weapon

Then again, you might be, but chances are not in your favour.

>>945193
Triggering liberals like you is half the reason I tote an AR and basic "military style" gear into the woods. It is a defensive weapon, people also use them quite successfully to hunt with.

My state and area is great for it too. If your ever wandering around denali national park and see a Non-LEO carrying an AR15 and alice gear, it's probably just me out triggering the swarms of hippy tourists that fill the park every year.

It fills my heart with pride seeing them cling to whatever poor sap is their "guide" or near by park ranger for protection and their crestfallen look as they receive the explanation that this is alaska and there's not a damn thing that can be done about the scary guy with a salt gun.

Basically, I'm just gonna shoot any bear spray carrying hippy scum in the dick.

WITH MUH A ARE.

>>945806
> projecting this much
> advocate for shooting innocent people who just hold different opinions.
> judging people before knowing them because his superior atheist intellect has never been wrong.

This is why liberals should not own guns. They are unstable, don't understand consequences and, base their decisions on heat of the moment feelings instead of reason and fact.

>>945808
>I read bear attack statistics
You conservative Trump voting whack job, you probably carry bear spray!

What a loser, waiting for the threat to appear before taking action.

>>945811
> Doesn't know civilian AR15 ownership is greater than the amount the US Department of Defense owns.
> literally a couple dozen million ARs in the US.
> literally only a small handful of Non terrorist mass shootings have ever taken place with one.

If people that owned ARs were as dangerous as you imply, there would be literal blood in the streets 24/7.

Oh wait.... I mean blood caused by white people for once not gang bangin niggers.

File: 20160901_134620-1.jpg (4MB, 2578x1940px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2578x1940px

>>945818
>Triggering liberals on /out/
> Still doesn't replace the real thing.

God I can't wait for it to be summer again.

>>945818
Are you suggesting there is something wrong with a gay black man with a college degree owning an AR15 in San Francisco?

>>945829
No?
Well other than the fact I'm pretty sure California would require it to be neutered and registered as an assault weapon.

Are you a liberal dumbass who doesn't feel the need to back up his professors feelings with logic?

Yes. We can all tell as soon as you devolved into incoherent shit posting. Way to back up my theory that all liberals are man-children

>>945829
Well, unless it's a eunuch AR, he's breaking the law.

>not that there's anything wrong with that

File: 20161117_131509-1.jpg (1MB, 1458x1452px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1458x1452px

>>945826
Also here's my winter time setup. I barely break out the plate carrier and 3A vest because animals don't shoot guns. But in the wintertime it adds just enough heat retention to make it worth it. Summertime it's hot as balls in all that. But it makes for one hell of a work out.

R8 my layering

>>945849
Wannabe military/10

>>945871
Wannabe milita if anything.

Honestly though, once trump was elected I was like shit. Never thought I'd be fighting to uphold a legitimatly elected government.

But of course liberals have yet to stop destroying their own havens of degeneracy. I doubt I'll ever get to shoot one..

>>945873
Even if I lived in burgerland I couldn't wear this stuff without feeling embarrassed. Sure it looks/sounds cool as fuck on paper but Jesus. At least you have the option. Furthermore, you won't be defending shit, the days of American citizens rising up and long since passed.

>>945873
>hopeing for a shooting war wiith the liberals

That's like "hopeing" Broccoli Alabama would repair race relations. Or do anything...

>>945876
I know it looks kinda dweebish, but it's a small conservative town and I casually competition shoot so locals know I'm a gearqueer and don't care, it's the tourists and seasonals I like to trigger.

I mostly own it because I have disposable income and hobbies that need no more justification than any other hobby. Plus the prospect of joining some form of armed paramilitary group to go defend 'murica from anarcho-commies is some what romantic.

>>945884
Maybe Ausland will have no jobs for my degree and i'll "have to" move to yankland and do the same anon.

>>945886
I don't care about your color, religion, creed, which/who's hole you like to put it in. As long as you can call yourself a patriotic american and don't suscribe to any communist philosophys, I'd be happy to see you on our side.

File: AR shoot.webm (3MB, 740x554px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 740x554px

>so what are the laws regarding carrying firearms and shooting in national forest?

I do it all the time.

>>944362
>Neither one is any good for predator defence

Nuggets have been dropping bears since before you were born

>>945179
>>945193
>Favour

You're probably a europoor on top of it or some immigrant ESL, that makes sense why you're so ignorant.

I kill about 4-5 bears a year and countless coyotes and raccoons/foxes, you expect me to use a durr rifle and a $25 box of ammo on that when 7.62x39 is $5? Tip top kek kiddo.

I raise livestock including cows, chickens and horses, I have an intrinsic right to defend my property and the lives of my livestock with whatever I want, my right to self defense with whatever weapon I choose extends to wherever I decide to go and that includes "innawoods" whether you think it's "rational" or "conscious" isn't up to you because real men decided a long time ago that Americans have the right to do what they want and I live in a free state where that idea is held sacred.

>Also how the fuck is classical liberalism an SJW line of garbage?
>>945060
>To further explain, the idea that everybody should have the freedoms to do this is based on classical liberalism and relies on the belief that man is inherently rational and reasonable enough to make responsible and conscious decisions.

You used the term yourself, I am more than capable of making conscious decisions when I held the responsibility of policing the middle east for years, for someone who spouts so much about individual freedom you sure are a prick about how people choose to use it, which is generally the case with your kind, you bring up civil liberties, individual rights and etc but then decry certain aspects when those things are held absolute without exception because it hurts your feels.

Have fun trying to chamber a second round with your fudd rifle or clunky bolt Mosin when a massive 30mph 1,200lb brown bear is charging you from 25 yards away, you're probably going to die.

>>945887
> move to America
> be American

If only nationalism was that easy. Nazis had to go and ruin that word for us.

>>945887
Of course mate, I'd expect the same of anyone who moved here.

>>945893
>muh constitution
Never said the freedom should be taken away

>having freedom means others can't criticize your use of those freedoms
Not how it works. You criticize SJW's for being faggots yet you advocate full exploitation of constitutional rights and freedoms which includes free speech. You criticize my use of free-speech to openly criticize your actions just the same.

I can say you're fucked for your particular use of a freedom without criticizing the freedom itself.

>blah blah bears whatever
Unless you're intentionally trying to sneak up on and provoke a bear, this should never happen anyway. You're creating an incredibly convoluted hypothetical. You have the common man vs. nature attitude that nature is this evil thing that needs to be conquered. Bears aren't inherently going to try to hunt you down and kill you. Even if this does happen, you don't need a semi-automatic weapon and you don't need to shoot the bear 20 times. You can if you want but of course you're retarded. A 12 gauge with 00 or slug rounds is definitely capable. This isn't a battleground, you don't need to bring in the troops.

And the difference in ammunition costs looks to be pretty different where I live but still, you're either shooting a shit ton of animals or your aim is really really poor.

>4-5 bears a year
Are you hunting them or what? How is this even possible. Do you even try to avoid a conflict with a bear or do you just decide 'I have my gun so why bother'? You really shouldn't be needing to shoot that many bears unless you're just shooting them on sight or hunting them, in which case its not "self-defense". The whole thing screams the "he's coming right at us" from 200m away line of thought.

>>945912
Not him but your fucking stupid and clearly don't understand firearms, america, or the outdoors.

Black bears are like large predatory racoons in alot of places. Shit I could go on a 2 day hike out my back door here in alaska and see anywhere from zero to 5 bears depending on the direction i take.

And finally. This is america, land of the free. If I want to use a light weight, reliable firearm that can put out a decent rate of fire in an accurate manner to save myself or property (livestock in his case) from bears, wolves, hogs, large cats, coyotes, ect ect I'm free to do so. I carry a leveraction 45/70 when I'm going into bear country. But you know what? In the winter when wolves are the worst of my worries the AR15 it is.

>>945803
>it is a defensive weapon
Sure it is but its still way overkill.

If you want to hunt with it, sure I mean you might as well give yourself the greatest edge possible if that's the aim of the game for you but if we're talking about self-defense, its ridiculous overkill. The only reason to carry it is to look cool yet the people who do carry them for "self-defense" religiously defend their absolute necessity over a normal 12 gauge or more traditional gun. They (you) seem to genuinely believe that their tacticool gun isn't necessary, its just there to make them feel like a soldier while out in the woods.

Nigger.

>>945916
It is not overkill. How dumb are you? Most are an intermediate cartridge and the only thing most intermediate calibers have going for them is penetration. And obviously once you score that CNS hit and the bear drops you stop firing.

Compare an intermediate (5.56x45) a 55gr .22 caliber bullet going 3100fps to a full power (30-06) 180gr .30 caliber bullet going 2900fps.

The advantage 5.56 has over .30-06 is it's controllability and ease of follow up shots. Both will penetrate the couple feet needed to score a CNS or heart shot. But 5.56 will do less tissue damage along the way.

In the grand scheme of not being bear poop, the bear needs to die asap. Faster rounds on target more accurately improves your odds. Not the old fudd lore of "Hurr just put a slug in her bing bang boom"

In fact anyone who's been trained to use a gun defensively will tell you, you keep shooting until the threat stops.

>>945920
Infact I would argue that the only thing holding back the already pretty widespread use of ARs as everyday rifles is assholes like you that need to shame people for no good reason other than feelings.

>>945916
>>945922

You you. Not me

>>945920
Con't

I emphasize CNS or heart shots because that is what's going to kill the bear or whatever then and there. You can achieve a fatal hit with a manual action, but why handicap yourself in the game of survival to appease some fat communist peice of shits feelings?

Manual actions will always be slower than semi auto, a shotgun of similar weight to an AR will hold 3 to 5 rounds. Again, why handicap yourself because some handicapped hippy says salt guns are scary?

The fact you recommended 00 buck along with slugs just proves to me you have no real concept of ballistics or penetration. Tissue damage may kill the bear, eventually. Either after it mauls your ass or just takes off into the woods to slowly bleed to death. Why cause unnecessary suffering? God your fucking despicable.

>>945933
Long story short.

WELCOME TO THE TOP OF THE FOOD CHAIN, YOU MIGHT AS WELL TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE OF IT FAGGOT.

>>945912
Would you recommended a Single Action Army revolver for concealed carry? No. Absolutely fucking not with modern handguns being a reliable/avaliable option.

>>945916
And that you would imply anything could be overkill is retardedly absurd. I could use a goddamn rpg-9 or china lake for fucks sake and it wouldn't be overkill.

The goal is to kill a thing that is about to try and kill you. Nothing is overkill. The intended result is to kill.

Again. When met with life threatening aggression, nothing is overkill.

I mean maybe burning 1000 acres of forest to get back at the bears family is overkill. But nothing done to said bear could be construed as overkill. As you should intend to kill it. If your not willing to kill to save your own life you have no life worth living and might as well be bear poop.

>>944654
Yes i would trust "any random jackoff"
Unless they give me a reason not to think theyre safe and responsible why would i?

ARs in general are very accurate, cheap, and comfortable to shoot. I could get a .270 savage with a shit scope for the same price but a fullsized round out of a ~4-5lb rifle isnt fun. I think some people go overboard with attachments but if it works for them why should i care? I can justify pretty much anything on a rifle even if i dont use it.


Also what practical difference is there between carrying a semiauto or manual action firearm?

Btw almost every civilian AR ive used is way nicer than the ones i use in the military

>>945920
> Anon goes in dry and keeps on ramming

I love when papa /k comes to visit.

File: 20161203_092920.jpg (901KB, 2560x1536px) Image search: [Google]

901KB, 2560x1536px

>>945920
>>945933
>keep shooting
>fitty rnd sticks

I'm in.

File: IMG_0802.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>944654
>If somebody wants to go to a shooting range, sure
>If you go innawoods, there's no
buddy
guy
pal

My shooting range IS innawoods.

>>944362
ARs are fucking great for predator defense where 99% of the US lives.
The biggest shit you'll find is a cougar or a black bear, or if you're up north a pissed off moose(which can be dropped with a .40 glock as shown in that one video).

t. someone who hunts with an AK

File: 20161203_121502.jpg (2MB, 2560x1536px)

2MB, 2560x1536px

>>946011
>snowball killah detected

>>945986
Well I have mixed feelings about pistol caliber carbines for innawoods guns. If you don't have to worry about brown bears and use hot loaded FMJ, you could achieve the necessary penetration.

Of course with a good trigger and training you could probably shave a few tenths of a second off each shot considering it'll have even less recoil than intermediate caliber carbines.

Go with what your comfortable with. After all it's going to be your ass that's on the line not mine.

File: 20170207_185438.jpg (680KB, 2576x1932px) Image search: [Google]

680KB, 2576x1932px

>>946368
>i eat meat

File: 20161203_155001.jpg (2MB, 2560x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1536px

>>946368
>pudding
>pruff

All 5.7, 150yrds.

>>946370
>>946372
I have no idea what your point is.

I can only assume you were trying to be like "Hurr see you'd draw the line at this super powerful specopscod4ghostrecon gun" and when I explained the pros and cons of a PCC vs AR as any rational and informed person would. The rectal tear I left you earlier started bleeding again.

Go see a doctor about that ruptured colon, might get infected. You already sound septic.

>>946372
Connected 5/50 at 150yds. Looks about a 8 to 10 MOA group. Speaks for nothing of it's penetration ability or how little energy those 40gr bullets carry out to 150yds. Damn your retarded, I mean if you can afford to waste your money on a P90, more power to you. But to think that your shitty photo shows any kind of evidence of anything relevant... just damn.

>>946383
> ruptured colon
> already sound septic

Yes, I'm fully implying that you talk out of your ass.

>>944800
>wildlife defense
kek

>>946426
Sorry typo, I meant 1500 yards.

And btw, that is a 6" plate, so watch the langauge.

>>946734
Also, I only shot 5/50.

>>946734
>>946734
>>946736
>>946532
>>946532
>>946734
>>946736
Your obviously desperate for (you)s so there you go pal. Enjoy being generally despised and alone.

Clearly not a 6 inch plate and I doubt you could even shoot a consistent group at 15yds. Much less 3/4ths of a mile with a handgun caliber. A shitty handgun caliber too. 5.7 sucks.

>>946734
I doubt you could even walk 1500yds much less the extra 1500 to walk back.

>>947054
I just use my power scooter.

I go hunting in the Superior National Forest every fall. Never seen a game warden or park ranger. We plink in the gravel pits too. Whenever we hike or are in the woods we carry pistols because of wild dogs/people.

>>947048
>5.7
>deadly on Goa'ould.

Whachoo talkin' 'bout?

>>947109
> stargate nerd (didn't even spell it right faggot)
> no practical knowledge of firearms or the outdoors.
> taste in firearms is almost as bad as his taste in television.

If the sub-par quality of your shitposting shows me anything it's that you've probably never been out of your mom's basement.

And "Hurr I was just pretending to be retarded" " thanks for the yous XD LMAO" is a further sign of mental instability and desperation for human interaction. Of course you'd never admit how alone you feel. Cause your a strong independent mind that lives of his mom's welfare and no woman could even comprehend the awesomeness that is you and that is why your still single. Not because no female could ever find your patchy beard, fat rolls, or stench sexually attractive.

Now if you think your better than me cause you got a reply out of me your dead wrong. Lurkers will read my posts and hopefully gain some practical knowledge, they will see yours and think " wow what a faggot"

And on top of things. I'm going to forget all about you when I close this thread and go cuddle up next to my insanely hot girlfriend surrounded by my own personal possesions in the cabin that I own. With my 2010 silverado out front.

You'll probably be riding this bit of human interaction for the next couple weeks.

Oh and do try to stay mad about trump winning. He's doing good by my town.

>>947117
>knowing the proper spelling of fantasy characters on a show you don't like
>2010
Ur cool.

>>947235
Had to google what it was faggot.

Plus the silverado is probably worth 10 times as much as your 92 Honda.

>>944652
Made enough of a difference to get every attempt at national gun control shot down. It's not just a "definition", it's the fucking designation outlined by Congress in the first fucking place.

3/10, here's your (You).

>>947599
>im gonna forget
>>947117
I knew you'd be back for another ass whipping!
>had to google
You lying motherfucker.

>>945060
>limit to these freedoms
No, the same document that states your right to sound like an idiot also states that others have the right to carry like an idiot. You don't get to choose which rights other people get to exercise.