Hey /out/, I'm hoping to get some walking boots for the first time (I've been using trainers until now but my gf and I want to start hiking more regularly, like once every few weekends). We do a combination of lowland forest and hill walking (no mountains just yet) and I'm after something cheap and fairly waterproof. I was thinking of getting some Karrimor Bodmins but wanted to see what you guys thought. I don't have bitch ankles but the balls of my feet start to hurt after a few miles of uphill/unstable terrain.
Also is there any other gear you'd consider essential? We try to travel light, I carry a backpack with food, water, jumpers and maybe a book as well as my camera.
>>785212
If you're staying on trails, sneakers are probably fine. Try it first and see if you need to spend the 100+ on boots. I wear trail runners.
>>785213
The boots are only £30 which is why I was asking. But if you think it's unnecessary I might leave it for now.
>>785261
To add to my post, make sure you look at the individual shoe rating. There are plenty of great manufacturers that make garbage products, and great products that come from okay manufacturers. If a shoe has 3 stars from >100 reviews, and one next to it has 4.8 stars with 678 reviews, I think you know which one to go for.
>>785266
Columbia for example has waterproof shoes, and extra support is okay, but it means less mobility. Unless you're packing weight or doing more than day hikes, shoes will work best.