Opinions on 70's C10 chevy trucks? Not typically much of

>>17841604
If they're worth a shit, you're going to pay for it up front. If they're not worth a shit, you're going to pay for it later. Plans for it? Pls don't say dd

>>17841613
I've got no problem getting one that's in rough shape, from what I understand they're easy to work on. I'd probably drive the shit out of it when I could but I wouldn't rely on it as a dd.

>>17841604
It's a truck from the 70s. It's spartan, uncomfortable, and terrible on gas. If that's what you want, go ahead and get it. But don't pay too much, because there are only a handful of people who want the blandest of the malaise-mobiles.

>>17841661
What would you consider too much?

>>17841706
more than $1/lb.

>>17841604
They suck ass.

>>17842362
Could you be more specific?