What's more tacky? driving a post-2010 luxury brand car

>>17831265
I don't think driving any of those brands is inherently trashy, nor do I think the working class should be stigmatized for driving what they want. I know people who earn low-middle class incomes who can save, and after years of it, responsibly purchased their desired cars when they could afford to do so; that's respectable.

That said, if by "blue collar jobs," you mean low-level service jobs like fast food and welfare leeches, then yeah. I think driving something you can't afford is trashy, and I think my neighbors are dumb as fuck when their shit gets repo'd.

>>17831265
>VW
>Luxury

It's German consumer level. Not luxury. Audi is their luxury brand.

File: 14_07_05_lexus_nx_standard_headlights_b6e97febc8676dfbe0b938b647b9f47db88faf0a.jpg (129KB, 1552x867px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1552x867px

>>17831265
Protip if your lexus has those nike swooces that come OEM it's tacky

>>17831319
They are all consumer-tier brand, fit for the ignorant bourgeoisie class of post-modern society

Oberklass people as well as royalties drive stuff like Bentley, Jaguar or RR. Hell they don't even gonna soil their hand and waste their energy driving one, they have chauffeurs and bodyguards that did all the menial stuff like "driving" and opening the doors. These proletariat, in turn, drove those "luxury" mercs, bmw and audi