Should the next Challenger try to compete with the Mustang/Camaro in performance, or remain a comfy pigfat muscleyacht?
Keep doing exactly what it's doing.
>>17800331
It won't compete unless it's completely redesigned so I say let it remain a pigfat niggerboat
>>17800331
reminds me of burnout paradise
>>17800331
it'd probably do better as a muscleyacht, considering it's one of the only chassis like that.
The dart would've been a great competitor, but they made it a commuter car instead and got rid of it.
>>17800331
the whole point of a muscle car is to be a slightly shitty car with a massive engine
doesn't even need to be fast to fit the bill
I'd say the Challenger is the only real muscle car left
it's doing just fine as it is
Fiat will probably go Barracuda/Cuda for that since they keep dropping hints
The current Challenger is a real crowd-pleaser. Leave it be.
>>17800436
What was the difference between the Challenger and Cuda in the 60s/70s?
>>17800541
Subtle.
>>17801074
plymouth and dodge
>>17800331
I think this picture was shooped... I can tell by the pixels...
The challenger is the only muscle car on the market and it sells well. It does amazing for it's intended purpose and looks fantastic.
The only other muscle cars are expensive Mercedes AMG models.
>>17801074
I think the Cuda was a little smaller than the Challenger. Shorter wheelbase, at least.