I make $37k a year (shite I know, thanks state job that required

File: 123549849845.gif (745KB, 382x450px) Image search: [Google]

745KB, 382x450px

>>17788017
>just looking for some ideas besides the $3k civic meme.
how about a 3k Acura buddy

>>17788017
Try the 5k ls400

File: 1503687996448.jpg (7KB, 224x225px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 224x225px

>>17788029
Which acura is 3k and not a total 200k+ shitter?

>>17788050

Get a jetta

File: 2nd_Acura_CL_.jpg (95KB, 1647x738px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1647x738px

>>17788067
youre looking more like 4-5k for an acura,the 2nd gen cl's and tl's are pretty good and inexpensive. Just dont get an automatic, the manuals had less problems.

File: 07 Accord EX-L.jpg (148KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1024x768px

V6 Accord. Don't listen to most of these /o/ punks. You won't regret it. 2008+ gets a pretty damn torquey 270HP 3.5L V6. Depsite being VTEC< it's totally unlike a typical honda gas ass engine that has to rev to the moon to get you moving. Low end torque is a wonderful thing in the V6 accords. Maybe it's the gearing, idk.

Fuck Acura, get an Accord.

>>17789032
>d
OP doesn't want a coupe, you fail
OP doesn't want a manual, failed again.

File: 2014-Mitsubishi-Lancer-GT.jpg (110KB, 770x516px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 770x516px

Lancer with the 2.4L

>>17789104
>OP doesn't want a coupe
Thats why i mentioned the TL as well.

>OP doesn't want a manual
Then he shouldn't want an acura.

>>17789121
the 2.0lL is more "boostable"

>>17789121
>so I was planning on automatic
lancer from that gen had cvt. That particular cvt is one to be avoided at all costs.