I love this and I could buy one but why is Range Rover so unreliable?

because it isn't japanese

lease it

>>17786301
Ah I wish JLR was owned by Toyota or any Japanese carmaker.

>>17786307
Is leasing for personal use a good idea? I heard it isn't a good idea.

>>17786317
yes
it's actually much better

>>17786317
If youou want something that you know won't go five years without trouble, but are hellbent on getting it anyway, then yes leasing is a better idea.

File: kkk.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>17786293
Because God loves handsome, square cars. So he punished Rover for making their cars into ugly squashed bulldog-looking suburban soccer mom trash

>>17786486
>So he punished Rover for making their cars into ugly squashed bulldog-looking suburban soccer mom trash
You say that because you have only seen them driving them. It doesn't mean RR is catering to just soccer moms. When will people just let go of this stereotype? Don't you have something else to hate on?

File: 2017-Land-Rover-Range-Rover-SVAutobiography-Dynamic-front-three-quarter-1.jpg (277KB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 2040x1360px

>>17786805
Not that guy but they fucked up the classic look that RRs used to maintain. The iconic styling has been distorted beyond reason and you're left with a generic luxury SUV. Disregard the badging and forget who made it and it's fine, but knowing what it replaced it just doesn't live up to the lineage. The same goes for almost all of Land Rover's recent designs. It all went downhill after Geoff Upex retired. At least the Defender isn't completely shit yet.