Would it be smart to DD a 92 sc400? I'm a wage cuck so I

>>17783755

You aren't; they're good cars. The problem is that you're more likely to get struck by lightening than to get a good deal on an SC400 that hasn't been riced within inches of its life by a dozen pot-dealing teenagers.

>>17783755
no. they are reliable DDable cars. just don't overpay.

>>17783755
gas mileage would be bad.
gauge needle leds burn out
window sill on the door panel likes to crack
finding a clean one is hard.

if pic related, fuck no.

>>17783764
>>17783766
Well I have a guy offering to trade for my shit im already trying to sell even. It has no muffler (lmao) and coilovers so it has a certain degree of rice to it. Everyone I know hates me for considering it because dangerous V8 sports car old low production no parts available not practical yada yada. Does anyone here actually have one?

File: Screenshot_20170827-194228.png (645KB, 1124x717px) Image search: [Google]

645KB, 1124x717px

>>17783776
Yeah, it's pic related

>>17783778
That car is worthless. What are you driving now?

>>17783778
>no parts available not practical yada yada

thats not true in the slightest. the only parts that are hard to come by are the aesthetic components like interior trim and body panels. the mechanical stuff is typical toyota parts bin engineering. the 1UZ was in a lot of cars.

>>17783778

>Low production

It's an early Lexus. Almost every part on it is shared with other Toyotas of its era. Parts are absolutely not a problem.

Its a good car *IF ITS CLEAN*, but you just can't trust old Lexuses any more because people use 'muh Toyota reliability' to treat them like shit until they fall apart.