did old american cars have good interiors? this is an old wagoneer.

File: 1971 AMC AMX Instrument Panel w-Engine Turning.jpg (111KB, 800x574px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 800x574px

here is a 71 amx
its shit

File: 1970 AMC Rebel (The Machine) 343 V8 White-10.jpg (66KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 640x480px

rebel
also even worse than amx

File: 1964 Ford Thunderbird roadster - red - int.jpg (487KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 1680x1050px

64 t bird
looks cool

File: 1978-ford-granada-interior-wallpaper-4[1].jpg (365KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 1600x1200px

>>17778609
>>17778616
>picks the smallest manufacturer that barely scraped by in its heyday

>>17778669
is that a good or bad car? the fake wood isn't impressing me. the green is nice.
why dont cars have plush carpet like that anymore? ever since the 80's its been gone.

>>17778681
It was hard to find a luxury car in the 70s that didn't have fake wood dashes. The car itself was a fine barge.

File: 1986-Amc-interior.jpg (208KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1024x683px

>>17778609
>>17778616
AMC's later efforts were better, even if they were dated compared to the competition.

>>17778715
I would give anything to have a clean, rust-free Concord.

>>17778599
Depends on the original price obviously, just like today. The Wagoneer in its day was a luxury SUV basically. The AMX was a cheap pony car underdog competing with the Camaro and Mustang, and those weren't any better quality frankly, only slightly less questionably styled.

As a rule of thumb the only American cars that aren't a complete piss pot to be in are luxury models, and even those were lackluster in some years.

>>17778732
Our pickup trucks have always been made pretty well too. But you are right. America has never been particularly good at making economy cars.