Audi R8 V10 Plus >Zero to 60 mph: 3.2 sec >MSRP: $166,150

File: 1503416011293s.jpg (2KB, 125x83px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x83px

>>17758464
its ok

3/10

>>17758464
Would be awesome as a weekend/track car

Would rather daily the m5 though

>>17758464
they managed to turn an Italian supercar into an audisteering pig somehow
get the Huracan instead

>>17758464
I only drive miatas cuz I like girls to know I suck cock.

>>17758480
Is it still a Gallardo underneath? That thing is over a decade old now kek.

>>17758491
more of a huracan now but same deal

>>17758491
Nope, now it's a gallardass

understeering vw trash like the rest of audis lineup.

>>17758499
Eighth post best post

Better than the shitty NSX or GT-R. McLaren 570S is a purer driving experience but apparently the maintenance costs are atrocious. What's the difference between this and a Huracan though?

>>17758464

11/10 - trigger VAGHATERS

>>17758712
R8 has a longer wheelbase and understeers like hell compared to the Huracan

Its a beast

>>17758464
why not just buy an older audi r8? looks the same and a fuck ton cheaper

I like it a lot.

Although for similar money the huracan is probably the one id go for.


...also it astonishes me that the new bmw m5 will have a 3.5 0-60 time.

Astonishing.

>>17759018
The new M5 is AWD

>>17759022

I hate to say it but from what i have seen it has the selectable option of becoming rwd.

Which is nice.

>>17759037
The E-Class AMG has the same shit and achieves the same numbers.

They're all the same nowadays.

>>17759018
3.2 second 0-60 actually
and it's only the factory time, real world time will be 2.8 - 3.0 seconds

>>17759042

Which will probably be absolutely astounding also.

..maybe numbers are not the b all n end all of things.

But it begs the question..

If bnw n mercedes can do it..

Why arnt audi and lambourgini?

Added practicality.

>>17759046

..looks a little off still

http://m.bmw.co.uk/en_gb/bmw-cars/m-series/2017-m5-saloon?gclid=CI-B9NLB69UCFa-97QodJaYENw&gclsrc=aw.ds

>>17759108
>can't into math

>0-62mph in 3.4 seconds
>0-60mph in 3.2 seconds
They are the factory time.

That anon is correct.

>>17758464
would rather have the lambo it's built on instead, every time i see pictures of R8s i do a double-take, thinking for a split-second i'm looking at a TT, icky.

>>17759116

I guess not o_0

My mistake.

File: 65487654656.jpg (107KB, 1380x356px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1380x356px

>>17759116
Look at that asterisk

>>17759145

This confirms that M5 can do sub 3 seconds.

The older ones had gated manual transmission and were probably the last manual super car if you exclude the low volume manufacturers in Britain.

>>17759145

Yeah its not going to be slower is it.

Although if it being in awd or rwd makes i difference i dont know.

File: 29634664952_96b2ec2492_b.jpg (79KB, 1024x362px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1024x362px

>>17758464
NSX does 0-60 under 3 with much better MPG.

>>17758480
>audisteering
Had a healthy kek

>>17758512
Made my day lad

File: WRX doesn't understeer.gif (949KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

949KB, 320x180px

>>17758480
>>17759236

kek what about subarusteeing

My next daily driver.

>>17759450
If you go fast enough you will obviously understeer

>>17760089

oh then audisteering is a forced meme.

>>17759450
What is unskilled driver

>>17760117

yeah I agree. The Audi driver is unskilled too.

File: srt8.jpg (106KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1280x720px

>>17758464
If you live near a track and want a boring and comfy DD then it's nice. A Vette with 40 into it would absolutely destroy it performance wise.

>>17760130

>A Vette with 40 into it would absolutely destroy it performance wise.

ohhh sauce?

>>17760134
There's a shit load of builds. There's a couple ways you could go. You could go with twin turbo's and turn it into a 1000hp+ highway or half mile beast or spend that 40k on sticky tires, suspension, weight reduction and some extremely aggressive aero.

>>17760155
>>17760130

>heavily modded vette z06 vs stock R8

wew lad

>>1775846
Overly expensive

>>17760177
Yet still cheaper than the r8

>>17760177
>buy X for $166,150 that performs A
>or buy Y for $9500 and pay a shop $40,000 to make it perform A faster

Fill in the blanks with whatever you desire, it doesn't matter

File: IMG_20170819_110912~2.jpg (659KB, 2773x905px) Image search: [Google]

659KB, 2773x905px

Eh. There's better cars to buy.

File: $130,620 Corvette.jpg (175KB, 1563x707px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1563x707px

>>17760434

>not knowing the cost of z06

>>17758464
Could get a nice Porsche instead

>2016/17 NINJA ZX-10R
>NON-ABS: $15,299 / ABS: $16,299
>0-60 mph 2.8 seconds
Get a bike. They're fun.

it's a supercar normie casuals who think they have taste like...but really it's shit and the worst in its class.

>>17758464
and why would I get this over a 911 Turbo S?

>>17758464
nice volkswagen driven by the children of chinese sweatshop owners "at school" in the united states

>>17758464
>$166k performance car
>600hp
What a fucking scam

>>17760489
like the R8, Porsches are for people just learning how to have money

>>17759161
>sub
more like can only hit 3.4 in perfect conditions

File: massive boner.jpg (136KB, 960x590px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 960x590px

>>17758464
>600 hp
>$170k
there's jeeps that make over 700hp for 1/3 of that price.
germany lol

>>17760994
the M5 has like 200 less HP than the GT350 ,yet beats it on track and 1/4 mile engineering>brute forcing power

>>17760973

The reviews of German cars disagree with you.

The M5 F10 official time was 4.4 seconds while reviews and real life tests proved that it can do a 3.7-3.9 second 0-60.
S8 plus (large executive car): factory time: 3.9 seconds while real world: 3.3 seconds
GLC63 (SUV): factory time: 3.9 while real world: 3.6 seconds

File: Bentley_Continental_GT_(II)_–_Frontansicht_(1),_30._August_2011,_Düsseldorf.jpg (2MB, 2133x1584px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2133x1584px

Volkswagen owns Bentley too, right? How does the R8 stack up to a Continental GT? I realize it's probably dumb to compare a supposed supercar to a grand tourer, but I'm curious.

>>17761203

About same... but Bentley is a bit heavy, so its handling is just grand tourer

File: bentley-continental-gt-dashboard.jpg (126KB, 900x596px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 900x596px

>>17761214
I guess I'm a softie, but I'd rather have the Bentley to tool around in simply because of the interior, especially if the acceleration is similar.

Why not call it the R10? It has 10 cylinders.

>>17761256
>not knowing the history of Audi
lurk moar

>>17761234
then Bentley is suitable for you.

File: p100d.jpg (312KB, 733x930px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 733x930px

>>17759018
>3.5
>impressive for a luxury sedan
That's pathetically slow

File: BTFO number 365.png (228KB, 534x568px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 534x568px

>>17761009
>bmw best engineering to date
slower than a 20yo mid trim corvette

>>17761577
>sport coupe vs sport car
wew lad

>>17760473
I was not referring to a 2018.
I was thinking of a C5 z06, dropping in a LS with a blower, or some form of engine/blower combo. All shop fees considered, it should be around 40k. Maybe more if you beef other things up for longevity.

File: 1494277392497.jpg (106KB, 593x578px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 593x578px

>>17761595
bmws face when their fastest 2 seater track model was slower than a camaro

>>17761009
>M5 has like 200 less HP than the GT350
So there are 4000 lb M5s out there with 300 HP and are faster than a GT350 ? holy shit why was i not informed of this!

File: m4 gts vs camaro.jpg (99KB, 532x592px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 532x592px

>>17761659
mustangs suck too lol

File: cool story nii-chan.jpg (88KB, 544x483px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 544x483px

>>17761617
It has more horsepowers than M4 GTS

File: 800px-BMW_F1_Engine_M12_M13.jpg (82KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 800x600px

BMW still 1500 HP 1.5 Liter engine.

Americucks will never recover

>>17761617
Yfw gm has never ever won le mans But bmw has
Lmao

Like the TT, Audi fucked up the styling after the 1st gen. Even though it's "slower" I'd take the 1st gen V8 over the pig ugly current one any day.

File: 1404042398568.png (131KB, 295x335px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 295x335px

>>17761679
yeah, American cars need more powers to overcome the refined German cars.

>>17761689
yfw lemans are fake cars and in the real world a camaro rapes bmw fastest real car

> :O

File: 1340433133397.jpg (103KB, 384x313px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 384x313px

>>17761693
>your car makes more power so you lose

File: BMW with more power.png (175KB, 1173x99px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1173x99px

>>17761693
Opposite.

>>17761711
>SS, not ZL1 with 1LE Package
try again, anon

>>17761723
Try with what? it doesn't change the fact that a M4 with more power barely beat a Camaro with less.

>>17761696
>in the real world
Where in the real world can I buy a zl1 1le :^)

>>17761732
The c6 z06 has been out for 10 years :^)

>>17758464
>TTRS GT3

>>17758472
>>17758473
lol'd

>>17761755
And has never ever won le mans in all those years Lmao

>>17758464
what is the normie obsession with top speed

>>17761875
>what is bragging right

>>17760130
https://youtu.be/srbGDQMhWBw

File: Audi-R8-Fire-11.jpg (90KB, 960x717px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 960x717px

>>17758464

>>17762187
>What do you mean?

File: 081314_14[1].jpg (163KB, 1137x640px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 1137x640px

>>17762187

An Extra Crispy C7 Corvette

>>17762192
see >>17762191

File: carinflames[1].jpg (180KB, 1024x764px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1024x764px

>>17762187

What does Ford mean by this?

File: maxresdefault.jpg (50KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 1280x720px

>>17762196
>>KYS

File: 1371013237831.jpg (29KB, 200x182px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 200x182px

>>17762203

>>17758480
huracan is x1.5 more expensive despite not being faster

why do all car debates on /o/ end up with pictures with cars in flames

>>17761711
Purpose built sports car
VS
A tarted up 4 series with water injection
A great victory for americucks lmfao

Best part about this car is its naturally aspirated

>>17762273

VAGhaters did it in the first place.

>>17762201
>Modified Ford GT
>>17762187
>completely stock Audi
lol

>>17762187
>Previous-gen R8 - old
R8 in OP's pic is 2nd gen. Different engine and platform.

File: Screenshot-26[1].png (1MB, 1041x713px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1041x713px

>>17762332

File: 2016-BMW-M4-GTS-front-interior.jpg (2MB, 2043x1360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2043x1360px

>>17762276
>tarted up 4 series

>>17762401
>Nu-male GT
Yea' that's garbage and the R8 is superior to it. no objections here.

>>17762273
It happens more often in supercar threads because none of us can afford them so discussion soon turns into shitposting.

>>17759450
I didn't know mrcummy bought himself a Subaru

>>17761275
do it 3 times in a row without shutting down from the heat and come back to me

>>17758993
older ones look far prettier, so it's an even better deal