This is a graph on automotive fatalities in the US. As you can

>>17748482
I agree, my car is an IIHS top safety pick

>that spike when muscle cars came around
>that drop when they died

muscle cars confirmed shit

>>17748482
Yes, newer cars are safer. Are you going to pull up a graph about the wetness of water per capita per year now?

>>17748482
This graph would look far more impressive if it was per person-kilometers rather than just per population

The chart proves that the best way to stop automotive related deaths is to enter a World War

>>17748515
Would dying in a M4 Sherman count?

>>17748511
and then adjusted for speed

>>17748523
Driving to the supermarket to buy some milk is rather different than driving around France while nazis are shooting at you.

>>17748515
World wars confirmed for saving lifes. He.

>>17748501
>that spike when the mustang came out
FTFY

>>17748482
I'd rather die in a pretty car than live with a hideous safe one.

>>17748674
>too poor to have both

>>17748674
>I'd rather be retarded because of cosmetic features being more important than my safety

>>17748482
There are virtually no controlled variables in this scenario. The design of roadways, standards of driving tests, amount of miles driven, and amount of drivers have all fluctuated over the years. Citing the change in automobile design as being the sole factor in the drop of deaths is blatantly irresponsible.

>>17748501
>be american auto company c.1968
>make car with 350+hp terrible handling and 0 aids
>make it extremely cheap to the point fucking teenagers can buy it
hmmmm why are so many people dying in car accidents

>>17748946
1900 was the best for safety with their advanced road design and licencing, it was the safest period in history. the graph proves it.

>>17748482
Yeah but they look like shit.