So what do you goys think of the fourth gen Camaro? I don't

File: 1497329507287.png (301KB, 468x494px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 468x494px

trash

>>17726567
I know it's trash, but was it good for it's time?

>>17726563
shitloads of aftermarket, solid transmission(if you got a t56), rear end is shit. swap an lm7 or lq9 in and boost the shit out of it.

regarding good for their time, yes, they run low 13's in the quarter.

>>17726563
They are nice a fun, especially during their time. No where as ubiquitous as they once were, but hopefully you can find one in nice condition OP

>>17726575
not even.

Great car for cheap performance. But most people will see you as Uncle Cleetus and nothing can change that fact.

The ones with the LS1 are great. Much better performance than the Mustang GTs of the time, more aftermarket.

>>17726760
>implying it was faster than the termi

File: WP_20150302_001.jpg (1MB, 2592x1456px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1456px

I remember I went to Maine to have a fling with a girl I met on /soc/. A friend tells me it's the kind of neighborhood where you find trailer parks and Camaros.

I get there and see this.

>>17726768
>implying the Terminator Cobras were fucking GTs holy shit reading comprehension

>>17726563
they're weird
on one hand the later versions had the LS1 which gives them awesome potential, get that LS1 and upgrade the valve springs and slap a couple turbos on it and you've got a pretty quick car, the early LT1 versions aren't terrible but when the LS1 exists there's no reason to get the LT1
on the other hand they can be a bit funny looking, the dash stretches forward towards the base of the windshield for miles and the back of the engine is buried under the cowl