How good/reliable are the 2015+ Challengers? Considering picking

>>17703380
they're ok except for the hideous bumpy plastic on the dash and other places.

Absolute garbage. Just get a Ford.

>>17703392
I like it more than the textureless hard plastic in the new Camaros. It's the same shit in the loaner Malibu LS I've had the last two weeks and I can't unsee it

>>17703410
Not op but I have a mustang which is faster and a fun car but those challengers are very good looking cars. Thinking about getting one in a few years based on its looks alone.

Also the reality of life is you're not going to be racing much anyway.

>>17703517
I'm looking at it because it's unapologetically American muscle in its design. Cross-shopping with the Camaro for sheer handling and performance, but it's storage and interior space is so shit

File: 2018-Ford-Mustang-Coupe-101.jpg (1MB, 2250x1375px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2250x1375px

>>17703410
But at least it doesn't have the downs

>>17704610
Can't unsee and will be stuck seeing for the rest of my natural life.

>>17703380

challenger is hands-down the most practical of the big 3. I picked up an r/t about a year and a half ago, haven't had any problems yet. Smooth, comfortable, roomy as fuck and hauls ass when you need it to. Sounds great too

>>17703380
only have 17k on my 2016 RT. Comfy car and have no problems so far. Wish i could have been able to get the scatpack, but they are charging a bit to much for them.

>>17704637
How much do you get for ebt

>>17703380
The chargers, challengers, rams, and 300s are the only thing FCA does alright.
>and minivans but who gives a shit
the 392 is fairly bulletproof (stock) as well.
>fca warranty employee.

>>17705316
>The chargers, challengers, rams, and 300s are the only thing FCA does alright
This.

Somehow these are one of the few exceptions to the FCA reliability meme.