What the fuck is the obsession with making supercars fuel efficient?
>people don't use them every day so fuel consumption is irrelivant
>less than 0.000000001% of the population owns them so CO2 output is irrelivant
>people don't try and drive 600 miles uninterrupted in a supercar so range is unimportant
Fair enough I could understand people complaining about the fuel consumption in a V10 BMW 5 Series, a car that is supposed to be usable, but in a Ferrari or a Porsche? Seriously grow the fuck up. By putting bullshit turbos and hybrid motors in everything you ruin the engines sound and response.
This is also an opportunity to remind you all that the LS motor is 20 years old, yet is still more powerful and fuel efficient than any of the turbocharged shit coming out of Europe.
>>17702282
>posts picture of corvette c5 when talking About supercars
>gives obviously false statistic about supercar ownership
>thinks people don't dd porsches
Google "CAFE standards". It'll explain it to you.
>>17702418
>'a c5 vette doesnt use an LS xdddd'
Fucking kill yourself, nigger.
>>17703048
You don't actually believe that having an LS under the hood makes something a supercar, right?
>>17703276
>he doesnt know about dat LS and how eurofags cant even compete
get out of here commie
>>17703276
Did you read the last line of the OP or were you busy fapping to anime?
>>17703332
>>17703288
The latter. For real though, I know the LS is an incredible engine, but a car having an LS doesn't mean it's a supercar.
>>17702282
>This is also an opportunity to remind you all that the LS motor is 20 years old, yet is still more powerful and fuel efficient than any of the turbocharged shit coming out of Europe
americans are actually this retarded
>>17703366
its funny because only 1 of those seatbelts will work
>>17703288
>muh 300hp shitty norevs truck engine!
roflmao
>>17703381
That's why i posted it