Daily reminder cars are at peak aesthetic.
Take for example a 2011 Mercedes CLS. Now look at a 2012 Mercedes CLS. The difference is huge. 2012 marked the true beginning of the shift from shitty looking cars to nice looking cars.
There is no improving from here. No expensive cars in 2017 will ever look old. Companies will continue trying to "update" the looks of their cars; it will just make their newer cars look like shit. Porshe is already clearly trying to do this. Let's take their 2014 GT3RS for example compared to their 2018 GT2RS. They're trying to continue "advancing" the look of their cars and they are failing.
In 20 years from now, cars will look the same - if not, worse.
Timeless designs don't exist
>>17632418
>>17632418
>laughinggirls.jpg
20 years from now? Oh I am laffin OP
How about the edgy 2020 meme look? The civic type r, lexus micro suv concept, toyota CHR. Everything must become ultra edgy pic related. Fucking waste of space, bullshit design.
Even the manufacturers from the French Caliphate have excelled in making disgusting designs. First the
>citroen
C4 cactus, then the C3 cactus, now the C3 aircross. Everything must become ugly tall-seated micro cars. (((Women))) want xboxhueg looking small cars (muh easy parking) with "modern" looks and it must look different. Not whether it actually looks good, not whether the design is practical (rear passenger door handle of the CHR), no no, the main question is; is it different?
the CLS used to look like poop and still looks like poop, they are nothing but new money bait, especially for turks / arabs.
>>17632503
No, the Civic Type R is another good example though of manufacturers trying to continue advancing but it has gone too far and the public is laughing their ass off. The type r was a fail. And it looks fucking retarded and didn't affect the look of the base civics at all
>>17632516
Yeah... no. CLSs are sick as fuck