Does this look a $35,000 interior to y/o/u guys? >Didn't

>>17626659
At least let us answer the question.

File: 2MQrY6t.jpg (72KB, 1200x601px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1200x601px

we already have two tesla threads, jeez

>>17626659
Looks like i'm staring at the desk top of a cubicle with a Logitech steering wheel attached to it.

>>17626659
Where is the speedometer? Am I supposed to look down and over at a bright white iPad?

>>17626659
Looks like a $15,000 interior with ipad glued to the dash

File: I4.jpg (388KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

388KB, 2048x1365px

>when a $3,000 poo-in-loo car has a better interior than your halo econoshitbox

>>17626659
the first smart phones looked silly compared to the ones you get nowadays. this car just turned ice vehicles into flip phones.

File: Tesla-Model-3-interior.jpg (201KB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 2040x1360px

I'm gonna own one and there is nothing you icecucks can do about it

>>17626691
lol ameritards eternally BTFO

>speedo in the middle
WHY

>>17626659
Literally none of Tesla's interiors look as nice as the price tag would suggest

>>17626659
Looks like something a first time CAD user would make practicing simple 3d shapes

I was originally against the lack of a dashboard but at this point I'm completely on board with the interior due to how whiny /o/ is about it.

Who cares? Who ever plans on buying this would probably care less that the interior lacks personality.

>>17626703
Honestly looks like someone super glued a small iMac to the dash....

>>17626700
>>17626683
is the pillars and ceiling made out of alcantara? how absolutely retarded, they should have just wrapped the entire interior on that fucking stuff instead of faux leather.

>hurrrrrr derrrrrrr why does mercedes put ipads on their consoles it looks so dumb hurrrrrrrrrr
>tesla puts a fucking computer on their console
>omg!!! wow!!11 so cool!!! elon ftw!!11111

>>17626670
Really. That drives (ha) it home for me. It's a fucking cube in a car. I can't wait to see the kind of home Tesla would design. It would make me want to eat a bullet, I'm sure.

>>17626715
>they should have just wrapped the entire interior on that fucking stuff instead of faux leather.

have you any fucking idea how expensive alcantara is?

they're idiots for using it AT ALL in the entry level version.

velours seats, and normal roof and you'd have a 29k car.

>>17626671
Yes goyim

File: 1444930113698.jpg (118KB, 380x247px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 380x247px

What I DO like about the car is that it seems kinda like a greenhouse again with all those huge window areas and it also has a quite low beltline for a modern car. Did you notice that?
The pillars are not too thick either.

File: teslareeeee.gif (138KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 400x400px

>>17626691
DELETE!

>>17626708
>I like things that people dislike for legitimate reasons

So you're a retarded contrarian? Cool

>>17626750
Point out the part where I said I liked it. Oh wait, you can't. Dumbass.

>>17626730
Is it really that expensive? Nissan has used it in plenty of their cars

File: 1501371867897.jpg (742KB, 3839x3093px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 3839x3093px

All the seats look like a shitty knockoff of the Model S seats.

This interior is beyond garbage no matter what angle you stare at it.

I pity the retards who think they like it because daddy Elon told them to.

>>17626758
Oh you we're replying to someone else, sorry don't beat me.

>>17626772
I replied to you by accident man

>>17626669
>Only 500km range
Top kek, looks like I won't be getting electric for a long time. Come back when it can get 800km to the tank and takes less than 5 minutes to fill up.

>>17626798
>drive 400km
>take a 40 min break to supercharge it and stretch/pee
>drive the other 400
>....?

File: 1499780441369.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>17626815
>Have to add almost an hour to your tips

File: IMG_20170723_190823.jpg (3MB, 2610x4640px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2610x4640px

>>17626779
Tesla seats don't even feel that great. They're wanna be sporty seats that are more like economy airline seats.

What suprised me most is the model X is a six figure car, yet the back seats have zero features. No screens, no climate controls, seat backs are hard plastic with no pockets. You get a vent that's it.

>>17626722
Think about it. With driver assist, or self autonomous mode, whatever you prefer to call it, this could literally be the office on wheels where you don't even have to drive. You can take a trip anywhere you want and do work at the same time in one sitting. Quite the business trip.


(tbqh i really hope that won't be a reality)

>>17626758
stop crying to me about your "legitimate reasons" you stupid faggot lmao

/o/ is as contrarian as I am. most of the complaints about tesla aren't even about the cars,it's that /o/ doesn't like millennials even though /o/ is entirely millennials.

>>17626833
This doesn't look comfy at all for anyone except the front occupants.

File: file.png (96KB, 225x350px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 225x350px

Would a Model S be the car that Nakazato would drive?

>Nakazato LOVES to brake hard
>Model S has regenerative braking, so his hard braking would recharge his battery
>Nakazato's entire gimmick was fast acceleration and loves to floor it
>Model S has the fastest 0-60 acceleration, the only important day-to-day metric
>Model S, like the JEE TEE ARU, is four wheel drive
>and like the JEE TEE ARU, the Model S is an overweight, understeering pig
>Nakazato's favorite color is black
>the model S looks killer in black

>>17626659
it is a car designed to reach a specific price point. of course the interior is gonna be shit

the only reason people will buy this is because it's electric

File: HGMS Tesla Blackout on HREs-5.jpg (127KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1200x675px

>>17626869

File: file.png (274KB, 634x479px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 634x479px

>>17626882

File: IMG_20170723_170330.jpg (3MB, 4640x2610px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4640x2610px

>>17626856
The mid row was alright. But just awkward because you're just sitting there with nothing. Not even an armrest. The rear windows don't roll down all the way! Really felt like being in a concept car that wasn't ready for production.

The windshield was amazing I'll give it that. The column stocks are weird, they don't have enough tactile feedback, it's not a lever like usual stocks, more like a paddle that returns to the same position. but I'm guessing 99% will simply get used to this as they own the car I don't understand why they advertise these things as muh future yet do not put in a HUD. It's distracting using the screen and takes away from the driving experience. They want fuck huge windows, use them.

>>17626779
It looks like 4 sumo wrestlers sitting in my car.

File: article-2291500-188FCECD000005DC-731_634x360.jpg (46KB, 634x360px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 634x360px

>>17626779
reminds me more of those "invisible driver" pranks where the driver disguises himself as the car seat

>>17626691
>>17626691
this is fucking retarded

File: shootmenow.gif (3MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 480x270px

>>17626834

>>17626659
Looks nice as Fuck

>there are people who unironicaly fall for "le electric car" meme

>>17626815

>supercharge

It is no longer free. :^)

File: decentinterior.jpg (775KB, 5392x3648px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 5392x3648px

>>17626659
If you don't look at the dash board, it's a fairly nice, minimalist interior with decent, but cheap seats not meant to be sporty.
The door panels are a nice design that blows the e60's out of the water.
The pedals look extremely cheap and trashy, the dash is terribly bad and disgusting and the wheel is piggu futoi.

File: e60.jpg (123KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1024x680px

>>17627119
>blows the e60 out of the water
bull fucking shit. you're delusional. I don't even like the e60 that much (bmw after 2002 is really meh) but its much better

>>17626671
Yes, dipshit. Now suck daddy musks dick or else i'll spam you with stock photos of saudi princes and call you a cuck.

File: doors.jpg (85KB, 1024x1502px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1024x1502px

>>17627132
e60 door panels are horrendous.
That's why I chose them.
e36,e39,e38, door panels are great though.

>>17626778
No it isn't auto makers just make you pay an extreme premium for name brand "ALCANTARA"

>>17626659
>Does this look a $35,000 interior to y/o/u guys?
No one is going to buy the $35,000 version. And the ones being made now are not the $35K but the $44K versions for better PR value due to the better description.

Everyone will want to upgrade the interior, but the next package for the Model 3 $35K car is a $5000 upgrade package. SO it is basically $40K or suffer. And it makes no sense to get a tesla EV without any of the automated driving features such as parking, stay in lane, automated cruise control and that is another $5000. And if you want to future proof that software with software updates, you have to add another $3000 to the price at purchase time. Or you can pay a zillion dollars later.

By the way, the $35K car only comes in black. So if you want any other color, you are buying options packages. Remember that some option packages require you to buy other prior option packages first.

>>17626834
>With driver assist, or self autonomous mode, whatever you prefer to call it
That is NOT the $35K car. You have to buy options packages to get those features. I don't know about the subscription fees.

>>17626659
I really hope that ipad has a dark mode because all that white light would probably give me a seizure at 11pm lighting

>>17626659
muh contemporary minimalism

>>17627757
my favorite genre. Peter Micheal Hamel and David Borden are gr8.

lmaoing at electricucks lives. You're just choosing when you burn your fossil fuels. Solar and wind don't provide shit unless you go with thorium, nuclear, and coal. Your range is also shit and you can't change batteries yet. Charging still takes longer than you'd like as well.

Man the future is fucking boring. WW3 when?

>>17626833
are those textured plastic seatbacks?

>>17626659
No, let alone 45k, or 60k once all the upgrades are available.

Neither did the Model S interior ever look like $100,000 to me.

>>17626694
Not really

>>17626695
>those seats
My old Twingo had similar ones

>>17627119
No every still sees a $50k Ford Fiesta interior.

>>17626659
>navigate menus to turn on defroster or AC
holy fuck

>>17626828

Honestly, I do this a lot of the time anyway. Stop somewhere roughly halfway on long trips and have lunch/dinner/etc, walk around and stretch, etc. maybe watch an episode of something on my cellphone. helps to combat the fatigue and take a little break.

>>17628520
i live in vancouver, all of our power comes from hydroelectricity. i rarely drive over 100km/day and everywhere i park there is charging available.

>>17626659
everything you need, nothing you dont.
this is an appliance. love it.

>>17626659
Yes. literally

>>17627132
e90s/e60s were the best bmws that bmw ever made

>>17626659
35k isnt a lot of money desu. It not having a HUD is into the trash tier tho

>>17626659
Why is the wheel so thick?

>>17626815
>in an emergency
>need to drive long distance
>hold on can't make it I need to recharge for a couple hours

>>17626695
the wood trim looks absolutely out of place.

It has a giant fucking screen, that's all normies care and want

>>17626695
We can always laugh.

>>17626659
Consider other 35k car interiors.

Is this car made for people who hate driving but are forced to?

>>17626659
I like how it looks like a computer desk with a computer screen on it. I bet it feels like riding in a comfy, self driving, mobile office. I will sip my coffee and do office stuff while I watch cars go by.

>>17628682
If it's like the Volt, the defrost comes on automatically using the built-in humidity sensor, and the climate system is temperature controlled.

>>17629068
I would rather have it be completely flat and longer, so it could be an actual desk and table. That would be cool.

>>17626815
>Drive 800km in comfy interior.
>Stop, get get gas and piss
>10 mins later drive another 800km.

>>17629295
>Changing is free
>Diesel costs £1.15/$1.50/€1.29 per litre

>>17626659
Where exactly is speedometer?

>>17629302
>complain about fuel prices
>buy car for 35k+ to save 100 bucks a month

>>17629313
>Buy 35k car and have to pay £100 extra each month
vs
>Buy 35k car and that's it

>>17629334
Why not just buy a cheap car if youre poor?

>>17626659
I like EVs but no instrument cluster pisses me off
Obviously this car was made for annoying wives to give their husbands a bunch of shit about how fast they are going. There is no reason for anyone except the driver to see the speed of the car

>buying the Apple of cars

TOP KEK

>>17629302
Gasoline is .54 per liter.

>>17629388
What is gasoline?

Looking at a picture and sitting in one are 2 completely different experiences.

I recommend everyone at least try getting your buns in one, it's quite the experience. I'm not sure who else has such an advanced control interface like Tesla's, but it's quite amazing.

On the Model X SUV, you can lower and raise the car's suspension through the touch screen. It even has a "jack" feature to raise the car up for maintenance without any tools.

Not a shill, I just had stock in Tesla ;)

>>17629304
Why would you need a speedometer, anon? The car does everything for you, including speed limiting. Do you want to waste your time looking at a meaningless number?

File: 1494312324380.jpg (51KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 512x288px

>>17626691
t. Poo in loo
Stop; both arecequally trash and i'd rather have a table with a giant ipad instead of this tbqh

>>17628598
Yes. Straight up hard plastic

>>17626659
am i supposed to switch the automatic gears from the ipoopoo

>>17626671
>>17626671
It has a heads up display dipshit, u don't have to look down like in your dinosaur car.

>>17626691
>bluetooth
>cd player
>usb port
Thats actually impressive for 3000$

>>17629864
>>17629721
Superpower by 2020

>>17629864
I got grande punto for £1000 and it also got bluetooth, mp3 player, USB port, voice control, and so on.

>>17626659
The money clearly isn't in the interior. It's in the tech and batteries.

>>17629178
Uh, yea actually. Elon repeatedly talks about autopilot being the future so the car really is for the driver who doesn't want to drive.

That's what /o/ doesn't understand. It's not supposed to be a driver's car. In fact it's the exact opposite.

>>17629932
that's not to say Tesla won't also make driver's cars. The roadster 2 will be pretty neat

>>17629935
Right. Elon is basically seperating the types of cars because his margins are smaller and he can't afford to create 3 different SUVs.
>Model 3 is entry level sedan
>Model S is performance sedan
>Model X is SUV because SUVs are popular items

>>17629759
It doesn't.

>>17626659
No shit it doesn't look like a 35K interior.

Batteries aren't cheap.
Neither are the engines that go in it.
Tesla has to earn back the costs it made in R&D.
Probably mark it up a little in the process.
Now where's the money for the interior and other gimmicks?

I prefer ICE to electric too, doesn't mean I actively ignore all logic in arguing about it.
Right now, for an electric car that can drive this far, that's a very decent price.

File: IMG_20170723_170707.jpg (3MB, 2610x4640px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2610x4640px

>>17629549
I've sat and driven one. Air suspension has been a thing since the 50's and you're acting like Tesla invented it.

>>17630006
plus the AP hardware isn't cheap either. Big computer, seven cameras, bunch of ultrasonic sensors...

>>17626659

Looks like future, I don't have problem with it other than I really hate wooden panels in car.

>>17630026
but every tesla with AP2.0 hardware, is sending data back to tesla. so tesla can use it to further improve the AP software. so it has value for tesla by creating a huge network of cars gathering real world data.

>>17626798
When do you drive 300+miles? That's a road trip and i doubt you faggots go out every day, much less every weekend

>B-but I'm cucked my commute is over 300 miles daily

Then this car isn't for you, move on

>>17630202
But I ride those distances almost every week. And not on a sissy pace but near double the speed limit.

>>17629864
>AC
>Powered Windows
>Colored interior even though it poo beige
>Automatic

Actually me too, shame it's Indian probably built like shit just like the country kek

>>17630221

Just get another car and forget about Tesla.

>>17630237
>car

Do I look like a faggot?

how do electric cars fare in -30c weather? during winters it goes that bad here for few weeks

does it eat up the life from batteries? can the car make inside warm?

>>17630255
LEAF and Model S are very popular in Norway, and seem to do just fine in the cold. Just keep them plugged in when you aren't driving.

File: 09a105511df53a870170d5f0de900512.jpg (221KB, 1199x975px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1199x975px

>>17630244

Don't tell me you drive a truck?

Or is it one of those open tray vans you Americans call trucks? That's no truck boy :-)

>>17630255
electric cars get fucked in cold weather

https://forums.tesla.com/forum/forums/cold-weather-range-loss

expect at least 50% range loss

>>17630268
Trucks are for small dicked faggots.

>>17630266

I test drove a leaf since I'm poor euroslav and can't afford Tesla and shit like that.

I don't care about cold but I'm concerned about those three months a year when it's very hot outside and I've heard Leaf batteries degrade quite rapidly under those conditions.

leaf would be DD and it suits my needs perfectly, also have a diesel truck and if I really have to go somewhere far and that's once in a year I can borrow car from my parents.

I know leaf is considered piece of shit in the states but it drives really nice and pulls strong compared to average diesel shitboxes we have here.

>>17629334
a $35,000 Volkswagen, Chevy, Ferd, etc will all be nicer than the $35,000 Model 3.

>>17630296
The leaf is a fine runabout car. Your parking spot needs to be heated or I believe they make a block heater for them.

>>17630296
wait until the 2018 leaf comes out. should be improved by a lot, and the front won't look like a frog. the heat shouldn't matter as much as the cold, if it stays below 34C or something like that

>>17630342
if it's plugged in it'll keep it at operating temp I think

File: green-nissan-leaf-630[1].jpg (25KB, 630x359px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 630x359px

>>17630351
I think the LEAF is a cute.

>>17630365
only in green. because then you embrace the frog

>>17626845
Wtf are you even talking about you retarded faggot?

Jesus christ come back when you can express a thought without looking like a complete mongoloid

>>17630012
It needed to have one because if you run over a speed bump too fast in a tesla instead of just scraping the bottom of your car you literally set it on fire because the Lithium battery explodes.

>>17629871
But not new you fucking cum gargler

>>17628682
that shit is horrible. Had a rental Peugeot 308 last year for a few days and absolutely hated that you had to adjust everything on screen. Buttons are the best cause you can adjust anything without looking. No wonder that car needs auto-drive and auto braking cause you can't adjust nothing without scrambling through 10 menus

>>17630479
There has never been a fire due to a speed bump in a tesla in the history of ever. There were road debris fires which have not happened since the installation of the titanium shield.

nb4 you get angry at me for posting facts when you posted nonsense. Seems to be common around here.

>>17630431
Wtf are you even talking about you retarded faggot?

Jesus christ come back when you can express a thought without looking like a complete mongoloid

File: lots_of_keys.jpg (35KB, 468x312px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 468x312px

>>17630698

You'll get used to it.

>>17630752
When I'm driving I prefer feeling what I'm doing.
Especially when the roads aren't really smooth a touch screen just doesnt work.

>>17626659
actually that's the upgraded premium interior. so it's 40,000. (assuming no other options)

>>17629302
charging isn't free with the model 3

>>17630752
only a retard would prefer something that isn't tactile and takes your eyes away from road

>>17630752
>having to look at a screen is better than being able to find the controls by feel when driving

>>17630752
no, I don't think we did get used to it. We have to look at the phone for significantly more time to accomplish things than we used to have to with buttons and keyboards like that. the extra display space is worth it, since it's a phone, but the ability to juggle other tasks has diminished in the full display phone world. And driving is another task that requires a lot more attention than sitting at a desk or jerking off.

File: oh lawd.png (882KB, 796x648px) Image search: [Google]

882KB, 796x648px

>>17630012

>>17630752
i miss the keyboard on my blackberry. i could type on that with my thumbs as well as I could on a proper keyboard.

typing on an all glass touchscreen smartphone is always a battle with typos.

>>17626659
it's an appliance what did you expect?

>>17630714
>I'll just copy and paste his post because I'm too much of a drooling, mentally-defunct mongoloid to say something

Please, continue demonstrating how brain-damaged you are kid


>>17630702
>titanium shield
Must have been a hazard to warrant such an expensive fix though, what caused the road debris fires if not the battery?

>>17630844
titanium is only $3,50 to $4.50 per kilo. which isn't that much.

I can get that selling scrap brass at a recycling yard.

though it isn't iron/steel cheap.

>>17630825

This type of keyboard never worked for me.

Had Nokia E70 and xperia pro with landscape qwerty and I used those all the time but with droid pro that had portrait keyboard I actually preferred onscreen one.

>>17630844
>Must have been a hazard to warrant such an expensive fix though, what caused the road debris fires if not the battery?
I never said it wasn't the battery that caused the fires, just that the issue was addressed. Why does it matter now? And it's not an expensive fix it's a relatively small plate.

>>17630897
Titanium itself isn't expensive but machining it to fit every car only adds to the already high manufacturing costs

>>17630917
Ah I see, I thought you implied something else.

>>17626712
Well their clientele are probably firmly in the Apple ecosystem.....

>>17626659
How the fuck do you shift?

File: mercedes benz rip off.jpg (41KB, 519x334px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 519x334px

>>17633068

>>17626659
This is the kind of car I imagined people would drive in communist countries in the future. Like if the govt owned the means of vehicle production. It's absolutely awful, scary, and I hope I never have to drive one

>>17626659
No it looks like my fucking kitchen counter.
Tesla is a meme.

>>17626671
Yep. What, you don't want to embrace the future anon? :^)

File: IMG_1818.jpg (85KB, 1333x900px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1333x900px

>>17628987
CARS ARE NOT FUCKING APPLIANCES YOU FUCKING NIGGER

PEOPLE LIKE YOU TRASH GOOD CARS AND SEND THEM TO SCRAPYARDS AFTER 4 YEARS

FUCK YOU

GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT


REEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>17630833
>>17633161

If its an oled screen and doesn't rattle at all maybe but its not an oled screen and it will rattle like hell.

Looks like Ikea did the design.

Maybe it has a funny Swedish name

>>17633078
YES! I love the electronic column shifter!

>>17632960
I have an Android phone and I want a Tesla.

>>17633706
I have an iPhone and I want a tesla


any windows phone owners out there that want to chime in?

>>17626659
As though Nikola Tesla didn't suffer enough when he was alive, his name is still being stolen and used for profit by con artists. Just LOL.

>>17629004
This, e63's too

>>17626834
but with traffic jam and mobile internet
already you have office

suppose the worst computer is better than most drivers ?
but I feel that the programmers will fuck it up some how

File: Concept-Flashback-1988-ITALDESIGN-Aztec-13.jpg (195KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1280x960px

>>17626670
the steering wheel makes it look very out of date
they could free up some space by using a joystick or rudder pedals

>>17626659
Dunno why everyone is complaining as the only thing that can break is the center console and it should easily be fixable.

>>17633837
exactly. solid-state hardware will always be more reliable than actual buttons

>>17633837
>the center console breaks
>can't see how fast you're going
>can't operate climate control

That is what we call a failure.

>>17634113
>center console breaks
>set car to Autopilot
>don't need to know speed

>automatic climate control

>>17634118
>set car to Autopilot
>literally die in a fire

On second thought, I agree. It's good design.

File: c7cc389a-3037-4be4-8314-80f1fb58c30a..jpg (66KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1024x683px

Hey guys, just took delivery of mine and wanted to share an interior shot.

Ask me anything.

>>17626669
this is a dumb ratio to look at. People who are getting EVs aren't getting them to go on 3-4 hour trips. you drive around town, come home plug it in

>>17629159
>Consider other 35k car interiors.

Exactly, it's Dodge Stratus ES tier comfort and finish. The design cant be compared to anything...nobody else has gone so far in making a personal vehicle so sterile... so IMPERSONAL.

>>17629004
you mean the e30s and e36s

>>17629334
you're acting like the model 3 would sell for $35k if it wasn't electric. The interior is so shit it's actually competing with a honda Accord, not anything that costs $35k

>>17626659
>ipad nailed to the dash
This meme needs to die.

>>17626869
>Model S has regenerative braking, so his hard braking would recharge his battery
that doesn't really make sense because you get the most out of it the less you use the pedal, and just coasting

>>17626691

A lot of the stuff on that dash looks like it's been handed down from Renault/Nissan

>>17626659
What the fuck is on the screen? A picture of the inside of someone's asshole?

>>17626659
It's between driving that and a prius.

>>17626659
These cars will kill you. It's been done.

>>17634718
See many of them to arrive at that conclusion, do we?

>>17630202
>300+ miles
>road trip
You must live is a small shithole my daily commute is almost 150 miles one way so gas is clearly superior in my case.

File: autowp.ru_renault_twingo_6.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

Call me when it has an interior as comfy as the first Twingo

>>17626743
This. I'd still be worried about that screen breaking off if I ever knock it.
7/10 would like to see them integrate the screen into the console

>>17635244
Also I think a 35k car should have a speedometer above the wheel as standard lol. I need to downgrade this to 5/10.

>>17626694
Lol these reddit parody posts always get me

File: JohnnyCab.jpg (30KB, 520x277px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 520x277px

>>17626659

Get rid of the Steering Wheel and you've basically got what cabs of the future will look like.

File: 5d68138d_Multiple-Monitors-8.jpg (1MB, 3264x1952px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1952px

>>17626659
LMAO THAT GIANT TABLET IS FUCKING ABSURD

THE VERTICAL TABLET PROPERLY DESIGNED TO INTEGRATE INTO THE DASH WAS OK

>>17634183
Then that applies to every electric car. A grocery getter

the screen is sturdy af. I don't think any of the "it'll snap off" concerns are legitimate.
t. a relative of mine got to test drive one

>>17635779
damn its heavy, also powertrain LMAO. Nigga if anythings goes wrong in the tesla after the warranty youre basically scrapping it or rebuying the entire car.

>>17635562
exactly why dividing their sticker price by max range is a fairly worthless infograph

>>17635235
Who designs these seats...

>>17626659

I never thought /o existed !!!
I have heard you people hate Tesla.

can i get a quick rundown/links/anything that would explain this ? as it sounds like counter intuitive to hate on them.

>>17636036
Less range than a normal car, takes hours to charge back up, only geared to go to 60mph quickly, bad build quality, everything besides brakes and wheels is not user serviceable.

>>17636036
TESLA IS LITERALLY ANTI-DRIVER

SOON IT WILL BE OUT OF FASHION FOR CARS TO HAVE STEERING WHEELS OR PEDALS, FUCKIN TESLA SMARTPHONE ON WHEELS

>>17636036
people here are into cars cause they're 'gear heads' they're mechanically inclined. Even an automatic transmission ruins a ton of what makes a car great for them. Deep down people here like when something goes wrong on their car so they can pop the hood, break ouf the wrench and work on it. EV is a computer on wheels. In that sense It is the antithesis of /o/.

A lot of people also take their cars to the track here. Teslas are slow and don't handle well. They're not built for performance, and car guys like performance

>>17636036
/o/ is whiny and hates things they don't understand, primarily electronics. On the bright side, when gas cars are phased out, the people here will literally suck your cock for a gallon of the good stuff.

>>17636036
OP here, I don't really hate Teslas, I hate the Model 3 and it's brainless fanbase.

File: 49778_Interior.jpg (218KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1440x1080px

>>17630103
>I really hate wooden panels in car.
Pleb taste tbf

>>17626696
Fuck off. We don't claim tesla, that's just elon and hipsters

>>17636088
>A car is only brakes and wheels
>Implying you have the capability to diagnose and solve an electronic problem on a modern, ICE-powered car anyway

Seriously, there is no difference with a normal car except for the lack of an engine. Every modern car is a computer on wheels just like a Tesla.
If your HVAC knob suddenly stops working, you can do jack shit unless you have a proper diagnostic tool and a workshop manual available, because guess what, the HVAC has its own control module and it has to talk with at least 3 more control modules and a dozen sensors all around the car. And this shit happens with pretty much anything else, from window switches to fuel pumps.

You are talking like a true busrider that never even tried to loosen up a screw on a car made in the last decade.

If you want to go for the "but muh engine upgrades" then fine, but don't pretend modern cars aren't drowning in electronics just as much as a Tesla does.

File: really anon.jpg (18KB, 240x260px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 240x260px

>Seriously, there is no difference with a normal car except for the lack of an engine

>>17637032
careful, if you mention that every car will have to have a digital screen and a backup camera starting in 2018 you'll make him have a fit

I wonder how Testla sources their interior knick knacks. Are they using one of the major channels (?idk).

I take it they're nowhere near economy of scale to bring that interior up to par for their respective price point any time soon?

File: pajama-boy-screenshot.jpg (36KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 640x480px

>>17627032
>Seriously, there is no difference with a normal car except for the lack of an engine.
Why did I have to be born in a generation of emasculated males who reject common, previously accepted forms of alpha status establishment like powerful loud cars? This generation is shit and I want to die.

>pic related

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-31 at 3.07.24 PM.png (2MB, 1872x1230px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1872x1230px

>>17637258
Correct, they still buy a lot of stuff. 2/3 from NA and 1/3 from other countries. About 10,000 unique parts for the TM3


>>17637282
Relating loudness with manliness is dumb. Get with the time gramps

File: Tesla-Model-3-rear-interior-seats.jpg (238KB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 2040x1360px

>>17637258
I like it more than the a4/c class/ 3 series interiors desu.

Also seems to have way more room a4/c class/3 series.

I HATE THIS MIDDLE SCREEN TABLET MEME
FUCK OFFFFF
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: FLDaPsc.jpg (84KB, 1705x477px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1705x477px

>>17637299
the roominess is partly more room, and partly the huge glass. You can see the numbers here >>17635779

Other cars just seem more... busy compared to the TM3.

>>17637295
The loudest most boisterous caveman was the one the tribe listened to, not the skinny enlightened one waiting for the alpha to finish eating the best cut of mammoth. OOGAH OOGAH BETA BITCH

>>17637032
Just because you're too stupid to work on a car doesn't mean others are. Quit projecting.

>>17637392
he's right tho

the single screen display / sensors up the wazoo = unreliable car meme is a dumb meme

>>17637392
Nice strawman you got there
Try and diagnose an electronic problem with your chink Amazon OBD reader with any car made in the last 10 years and tell me how it is different than solving the same problem on a Tesla

Just because you are too stupid to understand electric cars doesn't mean all other cars suddenly become the DIYer wetdream

>>17626659
what happen if tablet pc brakes?

>>17637843
you get it fixed
same as any other car component.

File: 1401254687699.gif (1017KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 500x375px

>>17626901

>>17637854
And how much would that cost?

What if it breaks while driving? Do you lost all the car informations?

It's such an impractical design. What was wrong with dials and buttons?

>>17637924
dials and buttons are more expensive, less reliable, and have less "options". For instance, let's say that your car has a three buttons to control the heat zones. feet/body/both. In a buttonless car, you can potentially get an update to add more "buttons" for the heat, allowing more control, whereas a fixed physical UI doesn't allow for that sort of upgrading.

It seems to me that people are only drawn to assuming that it will be unreliable since it's floating. The attachment point on the back is really beefy though. It'll be fine imo

File: 1498751528907.png (197KB, 608x541px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 608x541px

Just wait till the government starts taxing the shit out of you to make up the lost revenue. California is already starting with a $100 fee for electrics on registration

>>17638135
some of the taxes make "sense" in the sense that they're the sorta-equivalent of an ICE-related tax. for instance, some states have taxes on gasoline to pay for road maintenance. Thus the more you drive, the more you wear down the road, and the more taxes you "pay" through buying gasoline. EVs can't be taxed that way, so some states are just having a flat fee or something.

the better method would to have someone check your EV odometer once every couple years and tax you off of it. But what if you do your driving out of state? it's all very complicated

>>17637898
>Sayuki's Initial D's

>>17638181
This terrible California gov will find a way eventually

>>17637977
>dials and buttons are more expensive, less reliable, and have less "options"
no they aren't you fucking retard. touch screens in newer cars are often the first thing to fail and cost a lot to replace.

>(((supercharge))) your battery for "free"
>kills your battery in 2 years
>gotta pay $5k for a new one
>impossible to dispose
>muskcucks think they're saving money and the environment

>>17638364
> touch screens in newer cars are often the first thing to fail
[Citation Needed]

>>17638364
lots of crappy cars have crappy infotainment *software*. That does not mean the actual hardware is crap. And infotainment software ≠ core car firmware

>>17638181
>>17638218
California is going to start taxing the living shit out of everything possible (more than is typical) so they can cover their ass on pensions starting with the gas and road tax doubling. I particularly <3 Jerry calling everyone opposed to this "a bunch of freeloaders". Asshole.

I'd seriously expect this state to begin taxing the ever loving shit out of electric cars.

>>17638364
>>17638390
The touch screen in my 2004 Honda Odyssey still works after a quarter million miles without any issue. The same can not be said for the physical A/C and heating knob.

>>17638410
the thing is, I would rather have taxes for stuff come from the people who use the stuff. So something like an mileage tax on EVs to pay for road maintenance is better I think than a general tax increase. Just my 2 cents.

>>17638433
they won't tax EVs. they'll just raise taxes on gas cars to look progressive

>>17638410
a knob or button is cheap as hell to replace and can easily be done at home, a touch screen is at least $1000 + labor, and that fuckhueg TV inside the tesla is probably $5000

>>17638433
If the taxes were actually going to pay for roads it would be one thing, but just about every single tax is going into the "General fund" whether they actually disclose that or not since it's all about pensions. In my county here in Norcal road quality is pretty bad as a baseline, the only roads that get repair or maintenance are those in particularly wealthy areas or when major through-fairs are literally impassible.

>>17638442
California is "progressive" in name only. Among a long list of stories, back in the day there was a big dispute with Chevron in the central valley. See the farmers own the land but Chevron owns the mineral rights. The farmers were accusing Chevron of not doing their due diligence and allowing ground water and the soil itself to be contaminated.

In response the state of California had 2 petrochemical engineers start investigating and were determined that Chevron was directly negligent. In turn, Jerry Brown fired them both so and I quote "Chevron can make more money". This is a verbatim quote as well. California's need to tax the shit out of everything and everyone will override any hint of this state being "Progressive"

>>17638455
The buttons and knobs themselves are cheap but the internal mechanism aren't necessarily easy or cheap to service or replace, depends on the car. My experience is anecdotal obviously but a 24" or so touch screen is not going to cost $5000, that's juts hyperbolic. If it breaks or needs repair you have the stand which mounts to the dash, the screen itself + housing and the connecting wires.

In defense of Tesla, it's probably a hell of a lot cheaper to put everything on that one touch screen then try to design either bespoke trim or fit existing pars into the dash. Also while despised by a lot of posters here, there's a certain crowd that will be drawn to the Model 3 specifically for the minimalist design.

the more you look at the 3, the more cost-saving measures stand out, not that that's bad. For instance, the screen setup means that manufacturing RHD TM3s will be much simplified compared to other cars where there has to be a mirrored-everything. On the 3 they just mirror the stuff on the screen in software - that's it. Same with the AC. nothing is different between the left and right AC components

>>17630817

>Kim Jong UNNNGHH approves of this shitbox

>>17637977
Bruh, do you not realize climate zones are controlled by interior ducting? No one is gonna add a hair drier just because they have room for more buttons.
Could be wrong though with the ass freezer they have now.

>>17635779
>n/a hp
>0 hp
Its shite

>>17639064
was just an example. The fact is that with a pure digital display allows for updating the control scheme and such

>>17639114
we don't know the hp yet

i don't see what the problem is here

>>17635783

>heavy

yet quicker than both of those cars, and all the early reviews say the low center of gravity makes for awesome handling

>>17636036

Here on /o/ a lot of the users are devoid of the ability to think critically. Here are their arguments in greentext and then I'll provide a retort that is impossible to argue.

>Tesla Model S only has 260 miles of range and takes hours to charge
So you're driving a $70,000 car so you're obviously making good money. You drive your car the 20 miles to work, work, drive it back and then plug it in every few days. It's not like you're a pauper who has to drive everywhere, the company will take care of all of your flight fees.

>only geared to go to 60mph quickly
Speed limits in the USA don't go much higher than 75mph, so there's no point in this.

>bad build quality
Compared to what? A Porsche or Toyota that has decades of experience behind it and has been using roughly the same technology for the past 30 years? And what do these people mean by bad build quality? The majority of the issues with the Tesla are software related, which is why they have the ability to update. Eventually the car's software will evolve to become perfect.

>not user serviceable
It's a battery pack and an electric motor. Unless you have the ability to wind an electric motor or the knowledge to handle hundreds or thousands of amps from the big battery, there's no point in arguing this either. It's like trying to say that the DCT in a Ferrari isn't user serviceable because it's too complicated.

A lot of the Tesla hate is just poor bastards who are envious that they can't ride the electric wave.

>>17638505
>>17638410
California will collapse in your lifetime. Then you can witness the refugees ruin at least 6 states by mov8jg to them.

>>17626815
>have to look for an area where you can charge your car quickly
>it takes 5 hours to look for a station

Kys

>>17626815

why don't you
>fly 400km

>>17639234
>can't roadtrip, are always tethered to home since nowhere has their weird charging post things
are teslas the true cuckmobiles? even fucking priuses can roadtrip

>>17639234
the tesla map can automaicly plan a route and calculate your charge% when you get there, and if there are any superchargers nearby. it can then automatically optimize the route to take you by a supercharger when needed. It's all done quite well; and is a feature that puts teslas above other EVs

>>17639255
People roadtrip in Teslas all the time so I guess those people are just magical elves. I swear this place is myopic in the extreme

>>17633161
I agree with you 100% sensei

>>17639276
oh man I love driving up and down california and only california

File: supercharger US.png (820KB, 1098x598px) Image search: [Google]

820KB, 1098x598px

>>17639284
How much more do I have to hold your hand, little baby?

>>17637295
You should go back to whatever shithole you're from

>>17639336
>wanting less noise pollution is bad

oy vey

>>17626834
>tfw I no longer have an excuse to not be working all the time

My boss said he's going to give everybody in my division $10k towards these things for our commute.

Now I know why

>>17626659
How the fuck does this meme machine work? Where is the shift knob?

I would rather ride a bike over an hour to work every day than drive one of these pieces of shit if the left ever tries to take away my beautiful ICE's

You're all so fucking stupid, every day your stupidity gets worse. The car is made to eventually be autonomous, fully. As of now that hardware isn't available for the 3, but it will be. They designed it to be minimalist and eventually you just get in, and the car takes you from point A to B all on its own, so there's no need to make the interior sophisticated.

>>17640163
Continuing my point, if you want a nice interior/dash, then fucking get the model s/x. This allows people to afford a tesla, have the cool technology, but this is Tesla's guinea pig to be their huge ass fleet of autonomous cars.

>>17639190
>muh speed limits tho! Who cares it tesla is slow as fuck in reality
You will quickly find yourself in the back of a police car and your precious six figure ev on a flat bed of you think it's perfectly legal to accelerate as fast as you can from a dead stop to rhe speed limit, regardless of what that speed limit is

>>17639314
>all those massive voids
>the severe limitations on where you can and can't go
I get it, you've never left the city/town you were born in
Using a tesla to road trip is impractical as it gets unless you want to be restricted to routes at a ratio of 1 out of a possible thousand

>>17640170
I'd hold on getting a new S until the inventible refresh happens. The 3 has bigger center console space, better AC vents, bigger side pocket storage, and illuminated vanity mirrors, among other things. All improvements over things lacking in the current S's. there's zero chance that the S will not have these when the 3 really gets shipping

>>17640163
The model 3 will never ever be fully autonomous, you're the idiot
At it will just have the shitty hands free highway mode that we all know works flawlessly (not! lmao)

Dont expect actual autonomous technology for another 20 years
Dont expect Tesla to be around in 20 years either

File: finnlol.png (76KB, 398x310px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 398x310px

>>17634127

>>17640216
Funny because there's videos of people's model s's taking very long drives all autonomously right to their destination, driver didn't have to touch the wheel once. Tesla is making more progress in their autonomous technology than any progress that will be done in your pathetic life.

>>17640339
not to mention that current AP is only using something like 3/8 cameras and 4/12 ultrasonic sensors. They're being very methodical with what software they push to cars; everything gets used in ghost mode beforehand. The internal advanced AP builds are much more advanced, but not ready for the average Joe just yet

https://vimeo.com/192179727

>>17640339
Show me these videos
www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2016/6/30/12072408/tesla-autopilot-car-crash-death-autonomous-model-s

Tesla isn't shit in the autonomous world
They are irrelevant
Google and amd are the kings

>>17640369
I can tell you have no clue what you're talking about since you referenced the Harry Potter AP incident.

top zozzle

>>17639314

I want you to try rethink your interpretation of that map. Instead of saying "look at all these chargers!" you should instead be thinking: "only one charger station every XXX miles?" Additionally just how "fast" is charging going to be when you have to wait in line to charge your tesla like some retarded throwback to the OPEC oil embargo in the 70's?

>>17640383
>you have no idea what you're talking about because you referenced something that shatters my delusions
L
M
A
O

Kill yourself, fucking tesla cuck

>>17640369
> links the HP article, caused by a stupid human, not Tesla's fault

Oh boy way to throw your credibility out

>>17640494
My interpretation isn't "look at all these chargers!" It's "look at how this stupid fuck thinks you can only travel through california because he can't be assed to check a fact in his fucking life". Of course the charger network still needs work, which is why they're still rolling it out. Look at how much of that is in development. Next year there will be even more.

When you wonder why Tesla has bloated stock, try and make a trip in an electric car that doesn't have supercharging. Fast charging infrastructure is the bottleneck that only one manufacturer has a real plan for.

File: Sidekick_II_11_screen.jpg (116KB, 1024x856px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1024x856px

>>17630825
>i could type on that with my thumbs as well as I could on a proper keyboard.
wew lad. I never figured out how to use the needle button phone
so I got the big button model
shame about the weight and battery life tho

>>17639248
Because who the fuck flies for less than an 8 hour trip

>>17637977
you just went full retard

>you cant check your phone while driving, but heres a huge fucking television screen

>>17641855

to be devil's advocate, there's a difference between a screen that can be seen out of your peripheral and looking into your lap at a small screen.

>>17626815
>40 min break

lol what

>>17641878
okey, maybe a bit longer. you get 300km for every 40 min or so. Speedier superchargers are coming soon apparently