What does /o/ think of the GT AWD? I think it's the perfect

sage this bait thread

>>17586599
spotted the camry owner.

>awd
>Turning better than rwd
it's only better for applying power in lower grip situations on corner exit.

>>17586597

>v6

AWD doesn't help with turning though. It just adds more weight.

>>17586638
>wanting more in a landbarge

v6 is adequate, challenger isn't meant to be a track car.

>add awd to a car that already struggles to corner making it handle any better

>>17586597
>v6
pointless. you're not gaining much by having AWD.
>>17586646
>v8 means track car
fuck off retard

File: 1473006399908.jpg (23KB, 480x456px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 480x456px

>>17586646

>>17586646
Then wtf is the point of AWD if it's not gonna be fast on the track and not fast in straight lines because it has a V6?

>>17586670
it's for dads who want something that looks cool, but don't care about performance and are worried about weather

File: 2017-Dodge-Challenger-GT-AWD-104-626x383.jpg (33KB, 626x383px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 626x383px

>>17586670
According to Doge itself, off-roading.

Could be cool if Dodge sold it with brush guards and offroad tires in a rally-raid style kit.

>>17586602
so it's better at turning then

>>17586686
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they did that, they opened the Challenger to sooo many opportunities.

>>17586691
Not at corner entry, and in optimum grip situations you'll be slower due to the excess mass and drivetrain loss that are a result of awd

>V6
Nope
>AWD
Oh hell no


V8 RWD all day everyday nutsack
Slap on a manny transmision n youll be swimming in pussy

Oh youve never seen a vagina?
LMAO @ you

>>17586677
It really is. :^(

>>17586691
These normie style AWD systems usually can't react fast enough on a track. Luckily for the Challenger it's RWD biased anyway so it's not going to suffer understeer issues. But when the base V8 offers +75hp and +148ft/lbs of torque there is no way the AWD V6 Challenger will be faster.

>>17586697
>Not at corner entry,
>not at the less relevant portion of turning

ok

therefore awd is superior to turning

>>17586597
You know what else is not too gaudy? Learning to handle your R/T and using a much better motor
>>17586599
Agreed. Sage in all fields

>>17586638
>fca

>>17586738
>>>/reddit/

>>17586601
Not him but the new Camry will be sitting 4 horsepower of the v6 challenger and a Camry is definitely lighter so... even of he was a Camry owner it's more reasonable than being a v6 challenger cuck

>>17586738
Go back to /r/whatcarshouldibuy or wherever the hell you came from.

>>17586807
2 doors > 4 doors

no way around it, non-SRT challengers are supposed to be comfy landbarges,