How dare you call yourself a car guy and not be excited about

Because a shift by itself isn't necessarily positive, it can also be negative. This is the same retarded logic that implies that everything progressive is an improvement.

File: 1460743196721.jpg (162KB, 1280x842px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1280x842px

>>17547399
>tfw no more vibration and rumbling
>tfw no more startup sound
>tfw no more warmth of an engine bay
>tfw no more exhaust note
>tfw no more redlining on freeway entrance ramps
>tfw no more heel-toe downshifts
>tfw no more super or turbochargers
>tfw tuning becomes a lost art

I'll take vape-mobiles and bro trucks over a cold, depressing world of soulless electric vehicles any day.

File: KpXcBbY.jpg (154KB, 658x924px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 658x924px

>>17547411
How could settling into a sustainable and permanent human existence be a negative?

File: CRIME.png (803KB, 700x708px) Image search: [Google]

803KB, 700x708px

>>17547399
>Guys believe me, Tesla and electric cars are the future
>You just gotta ignore all the environmentally harmful batteries and electronics in it and we're golden

Because I want my car to be useful without the power grid, such as during a natural disaster or if necessary insurrection. Furthermore, even if passenger cars were all electric, the damage they cause would only be about halved at best, and cars are far from the biggest polluters. That's ships, pesticides, and plastic crap everywhere. Human existence will not be sustainable with a global population of more than a million.

I would buy an electric car if they ran on a gas or diesel fuel cell or at least a good, compact generator.

>>17547491
Sustainable
Electric
pick one.

File: hqdefault.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

>>17547542
>dat nostalgia
i counter with this

>>17547573
That commercial still fucks me up to this day, on account of they wrote "2+2=3" on the board.