How does /o/ feel about the Chevrolet Colorado? Why the fuck

It's a pos

>>17506692
I would love the Colorado but why would I buy a small truck with a (good) V6 for 27 when I can get a very nicely equipped V8 silverado for 30?

>>17506712
This f a m
The silverado is too close in price

>>17506712
Because your penis isn't tiny?
You want something that will fit in your garage?

>>17506723
Have you seen the new "mid" sizes? They're fucking huge.

File: Katia Sad.png (138KB, 253x260px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 253x260px

>Still two more years before the Ranger comes back to the US

>>17506723
>You want something that will fit in your garage?

their sizes aint much different

>>17506741
A Colorado is not fucking huge. Stop comparing new shit to 20 year old shit... Yeah a Model T is smaller than a civic too. It's small compared to a modern Silverado which is all that matters.

>>17506712
The Colorado is quite a bit better on gas than the V8 silverado especially if you keep your foot in it. The Raydo is also too big for most garages like the other guy said. Depends on what you need the truck for. It is a better value going for the Silverado though that's if you can afford the fuel.

People that pussyfoot trucks because they can't afford the fuel have a special place reserved in hell.

>>17506723
yes, because my penis dictates that I should get less-vehicle-per-dollar when searching for an America-mobile.

As for the garage, I think it'll fit. The key is keeping it stock and not doing horrible things to it for some sort of strange offroad desires.

>>17506762
I'm excited because the Colorado currently does well undercutting the Ridgeline and Tacoma. If the ranger and colorado start fighting for price then mid-size trucks may finally be the correct pricing structure.

plus T6 rangers make me moist.

File: qe1e213rfd234rtq3rt.png (78KB, 588x474px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 588x474px

>>17506780
the difference of 23 vs 25 hwy is honestly negligible in the long run. Sure this is accounting for the homosex cylinder deactivation but you're probably going to be in that realm. Even a 6 or so MPG difference isn't much over time.

with my driving in the silverado I would expect a cool 18 avg.

>>17506692
Why get a short bed when you can have the long bed?

>>17506826
>Not wanting the smallest truck

>>17506842
then you would be getting the frontier and not colorado.

>>17506842
>Not wanting the smallest truck

if you get a 4ft bed or even a 6ft bed, you dont really need a truck, you need a van.

>>17506822
Everything gets good mpg's on the highway, It's city driving that fucks your fuel up. That's when you're going to notice the extra 1500lbs+ and almost twice the displacement. If you're doing mostly highway then you might as well go for the bigger truck and V8.

>>17506868
But vans are fucking gay only only a legit faggot would get one over a small truck.

File: pickup-trucks-archives-page-2-of-12-autoguide-news-intended-for-2018-gmc-canyon-grill-removal.jpg (63KB, 671x411px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 671x411px

>>17506780
Left is the "mid size". There's no point in having them. Might as well buy a real truck.

>>17506692
I'm thinking of leasing a 2017 once the 2018's come out if I can get it dirt cheap. I don't know if I can drop almost $40k on a Taco.

>>17506954
The Canyon is way more bloated and roided up looking than the base Colorado in real life. It's obviously bigger than a S10 but not by much if you look at the wheelbase.

The only reason to get one is to get the diesel option, but they made it way way overpriced. Might as well get the much more capable Silverado for as much as it runs.
Should've made small cab long box with diesel an option for like 26-28, then you'd have a good pickup. I'll never understand Americans fascination with petrol pickups.

>>17506992
>It's obviously bigger than a S10 but not by much if you look at the wheelbase.
Yeah, half a foot wider, half a foot taller, 20 inches longer, than S10. Sure, they're almost the same.

While the base model Silverado is shorter, a half a foot wider, and only 3 inches taller. Seriously, the Canyon/Colorado is closer to a full size base model than it is to the S10.

>>17506992
Leasing
>>>please no. please.

>>17506940
>But vans are fucking gay only only a legit faggot would get one over a small truck.

Having to worry about the elements when hauling things is gay?

>>17506723
>penis meme
Post ignored.

>>17506692
The new colorado/canyon are good trucks. But WAYYYYY too expensive. I looked at buying one, but it's a scam. The truck with any of the good options cost the same as a silverado. It cost more than the Tacoma and Frontier. More than an f150. You can get the shittiest colorado for less, but it's a garbage truck and will be worth $5k in 5 years.

>>17506692
colorados in my area start at $23k. Silverados reg cabs can be had for 22k.

Personally Id get a Silverado.

File: 2017-chevy-colorado-gmc-canyon-speed-specs-1024x725.jpg (165KB, 1024x725px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 1024x725px

>>17506992
They're the exact same truck you idiot.

File: 5e7291fb52235ae96e87ee7792ceeb25.jpg (26KB, 236x395px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 236x395px

>>17506692
would love to have a diesel 4x4 one.

File: colovscan.jpg (326KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 1920x1080px

>>17507089
GM's are worth dick all after 4 years. My old shitboxes are starting to get tired as DD's and I don't feel like doing or worrying about any maintenance and repairs.

>>17507109
Underneath but they look different beside each other. The GMC is more bloated looking with bigger love handles. Get off your ass and go to a car lot sometime.

>>17506692
Supply and demand

More people want a crew cab and/or a long bed, therefore there are more crew cabs and long beds making them cheaper

You want an uncommon variation then it will require a special order, which you pay extra for

>>17507138
so you're gonna spend 14k over 4 years to NOT loose money?

File: Screenshot_20170709-192140.png (117KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1080x1920px

>>17507138

File: Screenshot_20170709-192156.png (157KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1080x1920px

>>17507160
>>17507138
The Colorado is actually bigger dumbass

>>17507165
>Google GMC Canyon on wiki, only has a link for Chevy Colorado.
I can't even refer to the two badges as they, because that's all you're debating, badges. It is the same truck, with two different badges. Just like the Chevy Silverado and the GMC Sierra. Same truck, two badges. It's been a scam for over 40 years. This shows how stupid GM customers are. Ford tries the same thing by building Lincoln trucks, and very few fall for it. GM does it for so long, no one notices, mostly because people like you think trim means something. It's just trim, no more useful than a wig on a stripper.

Look, the last time GMC and Chevy meant two different things was the 60s. Which is likely longer than you've been alive.

File: 1487487530224.jpg (319KB, 2000x794px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 2000x794px

>>17506692
Another shitty IFS american middle ground truck that does a bit of everything but nothing well.
Call me when we start getting 4 cylinder turbo diesels and/or a solid front axle.

>>17507635
Exactly. That dumbass was acting like a Colorado is different when I showed just how close to a full size truck they are.

>>17506692
For that kind of money it's either a Toyota or a Dodge.

>Not a GM fan boy

File: 1479878573691.jpg (449KB, 1574x729px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 1574x729px

>GM cuck trash

lol