https://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/ cto/6180670381.html Tel

>>17502973
He's downplaying the turbo aspect quite a bit in the ad, talks about muh rims instead of FI buildout. I'd wager it was put in cheaply and with cheap parts. If it had a few less miles and quality build I'd say $9k is a great price... if it had a different transmission

Look for a stock 6MT and do the build yourself. Could probably find a coupe with 90k and a stick for $7k

WHY REAR MOUNTED TURBO

For real what is the reasoning behind a rear mounted turbo?

Help me understand, /o/

>>17503118
Corvette does it that way too. Never understood it. Engine bay space? It MUST cut back on efficiency...

>>17503092
Lack of Room in engine bay and also decreases engine bay temperatures.

File: 1250497234326.gif (448KB, 400x277px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 400x277px

>>17503028

>>17502973
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTDeEJyCmNA

>>17503021
>>17503092
>>17503118
>space in the bay is limited
>keeps turbos cooler
>keeps engine bay temps down
>easier to do maintenance on turbos and car
There's nothing wrong with doing it. STS tested the "lag" of rear mount systems to regular and there is no noticeable difference.

File: pdaDSoI.jpg (326KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 1280x800px

>>17502973
op first tell me why you are retarded

>>17504314
>rear engine car
kys yourself

>>17503028
it's called a remote mount turbo set up, not that uncommon on cars that have small engine bays