Why are Camaros still so expensive on the used car market? It's impossible to find one for less than $10k.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1988-Chevrolet-Camaro-IROC-Z-/132249248811
you were saying?
>>17501751
Because Camaro's have historically had a higher resale value than Mustangs.
>>17501773
Because there's fewer of them out there, because they were never as popular and therefore didn't sell overly well. Plus the most coveted first gens were only produced for three years, whereas first gen Mustangs were made for twice as long.
Also anything after a first gen camaro is a piece of underpowered shit.
And the new ones are hideous pigfat garbage.
>>17501795
>Also anything after a first gen camaro is a piece of underpowered shit.
That is objectively wrong.
And the new ones are hideous pigfat garbage.
This is true, but the 6th gens are less pigfat than the S550
>>17501809
>but the 6th gens are less pigfat than the S550
They're still fat as fuck and ugly too. Mustangs slap the fucking shit out of Camaros, especially when it comes to styling/design. And if we're judging strictly based on interiors...the Camaro is assraped to death. TO DEATH, BRO.
And they were all underpowered until the most recent generation. First gen are beautiful cars, but everything else is ugly. Especially 4th gen, holy shit. 3rd and 4th gen cars are the domain of poor white trash. Nothing says "FAGGOT LOSER" like an 80's IROC.
>>17501795
>All of that as a response to resale value
Butthurt Mustang fag detected
>>17501838
>And if we're judging strictly based on interiors...the Camaro is assraped to death. TO DEATH, BRO.
What does that even mean?
>And they were all underpowered until the most recent generation.
That's why everyone used to LS swap their Mustangs, right? :^)
>>17501838
Foxbody ugliest trash ever made. Only the Boss Mustangs and fastbacks were good looking. Camaros outside Gen2 were always good looking.
Because it has a nice 6.2 liter engine with manual and rwd.
>>17501795
How go spot an alphonse