>3.5L V6 >700 HP >6.2L LT4 >650 HP Why would anyone

>>17490951
ameribetics are stupid

K

File: 20170321114619_1.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>17490951
true!

File: 1448050451249.jpg (22KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 340x340px

>vocal gm fangirls nowhere to be found

>>17490968
O

>>17490951
But the v6 doesn't make 700, and the v8 is just a configuration, it doesn't make it obsolete. And v8s are better for torque. Also supercharger vs twin turbo. And also I'm more of a Dodge than a gm fanboy.

>>17490951
>why would anyone use a V8
OP is a faggot

>>17490951

V6s sound like angry bees with bad gas

>>17490951
V8's are cooler

>>17491538
also slower

>>17490951
oh look its this thread again

>>17482779
how many of these do we need?

Grills

>EcoBoost V6
"Your car is so cute anon, it matches your little man;)"

>Murican V8
"Choke me daddy!"

>>17490951
wow the twin turbo engine made 50 more hp
my mind is blown

>>17493395
nearly 2 hundred lbs lighter

File: really makes you think.jpg (114KB, 1458x901px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 1458x901px

mfw

i wonder how much the tt v6 costs vs the v8

File: 1443132799397.png (348KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 449x401px

>>17493331
>he needs a car to attract a mate

>>17490951
>supercharger @ 9.2psi
>Twin Turbos @ 30psi
>V6 needs to move more than 3 times the air to beat a V8 by less than 8%

>>17493436
>having big ass pluses on the body
Who thought it was a good idea

>>17493523
>30 psi
wrong

>>17493523
>pressure=airflow

>>17493534
modern web design is shit
giant buttons and little text

>>17493331
>implying girls remotely care about shit like that

Hello virgin

>>17493536
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-ford-gt-supercar-first-ride-review
>>17493538
you're right in the sense of CFM, but airflow is only relevant with such a unit when the air pressure is the same.
think about it, 1 cubic foot per minute at 1 atmosphere is not the same as 1 cubic foot per minute at 2 atmospheres
>>17493536
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-ford-gt-supercar-first-ride-review
did they typo or something? how much is it boosting to?

>>17493562
rxc turbo runs at a lower psi.

>>17493569
how'd they get the larger figure? higher redline?

>>17493585
who knows. it still btfo pushcuck

ecoboost is revolutionary

File: 1448258916036.jpg (28KB, 276x305px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 276x305px

>at the apex of straight line speed, there are no engines that aren't Hemi V8s
>at the apex of track speed, the production car kings are v8s or v10s
>f1 cars were just cucked to lower RPM v6 configs like two years ago
>UHHH WHY DO PEOPLE USE V8S LOL FUCKING MURRICANS

>>17493588
I'm here to talk about engines, not fanboy. do you think they are running custom heads? more efficient intake runs than the GT due to easier packaging? or are these figures wheel horsepower and the RXC just has a lighter driveline with less loss.

>>17493605
ecoboost in gt is mostly stock. can easily btfo pushshit

>>17493569
and has less hp
weird how that works

>>17493613
wrong.

it has 700 hp

>>17493630
proof because i've only seen 650hp and lower versions

HOW DO YOU IDIOTS NOT RECOGNIZE ALPHONSE THREADS BY NOW JESUS CHRIST
DO
NOT
REPLY
IT IS THAT SIMPLE

>>17493613
oh, >>17493609 made it sound like the Radical made more power than the GT. http://www.radicalsportscars.com/car/rxc-600r/
says 650 flywheel right on their site
>>17493630
the RXC turbo (everything but the 600r) is using the 3.5l from the SHO

>>17493674
the problem isn't some shiteater making threads, it's people who know nothing about cars replying in agreement

>>17493592
DELETE THIS

>>17493662
see
>>17493675

>>17493265
Most of the time there not.

>>17493702
ok? someone was claiming 700, 650 doesn't equal 700

>>17493331
Girls don't care.

>>17493408
Citation needed.

>>17493711
I'm sure you could ecu flash it to 700 if you don't value the engine

>>17493713
see
>>17490951

>>17493711
it makes 700 hp though in top trim

>>17493728
>still 0 proof

>>17493289
as many as it takes to make gm fangirls either see the light or recall themselves

>>17493733
http://www.geeky-gadgets.com/radical-unveils-700bhp-rxc-turbo-500r-2016-03-03/

>>17493760
gm fangirls on suicide watch

>>17493760
ok so a 3.5 ecoboost with new turbos and likely new tune to work with them makes 700hp
that's some good power

>>17493760
weird.
now we have a
>N/A 3.7l V6 (350-380HP)
>Turbo 500 (454HP)
>Turbo 500r (600HP)
>Turbo 500r (700HP)
>Turbo 600r (650HP)
from the looks of it, the 600r is the GT's 3.5l motor and the 500/500r's are the SHO motor (also 3.5l) (obviously modified)

shit's confusing, no wonder people argue about this car's specs so much

>>17493869
ford gt motor is practically an f150 motor

>>17493885
Or is the f150 almost a Ford GT motor. You got to think positively.

>>17493885
different motor design, the F150 Ecoboost is closest to the SHO and Explorer Sport. both motors just happen to be 3.5l, DI and turbo

>>17493941
wrong. gt shares 70% of its parts with f150

If you reply to these threads, you are very smart.

>>17493957
what's the differing components? I assume it's just more forged parts, cam and valve work. the only other thing I could think of that is a major difference is if the GT is dry sump (don't know for sure but it makes sense for a supercar)

File: thot.jpg (14KB, 376x212px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 376x212px

>>17491015
im right here bitch, bring your fucking 3.5L
ill give it to you in the street,track or circuit
fuck wit me

File: ayye.jpg (25KB, 801x534px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 801x534px

>550tq
back to the drawing board BITCH!

>>17494108
>torque
>relevant

>>17494110
If you want to win races, yes.

>>17494115
Then why did the corvette lose to the Ford GT at lemans?

>>17494115
uh oh, retard alert.

>>17494127
rocks mostly

File: winner 2017 le mans.jpg (49KB, 450x300px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 450x300px

>>17494142
did someone say gravel?

>>17490951
>forced induction high strung engine that will last the warranty period and not much longer without breaking
>NA easygoing engine that will last forever with routine oil changes
Gee I wonder why burgers love pigfat veeates.

>>17494162
>LT4
>NA

>>17493681
Protip: its the shiteater samefagging.

>>17490951
Imagine what a DOHC GDI Turbo V* could do, OP...

>>17490951
What kind of cuck cares about stock engines? Which one will be more reliable at 4 figure power levels? That's what I thought.

>>17490951
>$500k V6 700hp
>$62k V8 650hp

why did it take ford so much more money to only make 50 more horsepower?

>>17493331

Bitch I drive a Honda CR-V with 250,000 miles on it and my GF calls me daddy and begs me to choke her every time we fuck. Now what?

>>17495720
sperg more

Here's your (you)

>>17495782
sperg more

>>17494189
ayy calabogie

>>17493592
This. Also, as much as american cars are shit...

>The ls is lighter than a v6.

Go ahead, weigh a vr38dett vs a ls7.

>>17496328
A ecoboost v6 weighs 400 lbs and makes 700 hp. a ls weighs 450 lbs and makes less than 500 hp.

try again cuck

>>17496361
That's the weight of the engine without the turbos

>>17496365
wrong.

>>17496361
The ecoboost is 420lbs dry without the accessories. Take your pigfat boat anchor somewhere else.

>>17496797
wrong

>>17496797
You're trying to weigh the engine without it's turbos, in which case give it's real HP figure.

It's nothing without it's turbos.

The LS makes more power per kg of engine weight and you CANNOT handle that fact, so you're trying to sidestep and dodge the argument.

You think you're shitposting and are a great troll because you act like a retard and people respond, but getting someone to respond was never what a good troll does. A good troll backs someone like you into a corner from which they cannot escape, with superior arguments designed to illicit butthurt.

And you are butthurt. You'll respond to me predictably with your memes, sidestepping the facts because there is no getting around the fact the LS is better than your v6 trash.

And this is coming from someone who does not even like american cars.

>>17490951
using/haveing engine in v configuration instead of boxer/inline6 engine

>why would anyone use a V8 anymore

Linear power and torque delivery means nothing to you does it.

I buy v8's because a measly v6 will not haul wood like a v8 can. That v6 will whine and while while the v8 is indifferent to the load.

>>17497027
wrong

Haha yeah

Now add Twin Turbos to the V8 too
https://youtu.be/Bv0nqR9YpBU

>>17498804
instant erection

>>17498872
Let me help

God knows how much torque this thing has
https://youtu.be/he1qHZRDyLY

>>17498880
>torque
>relevant

>>17499109
That's a two-stroke semi truck motor, so yes, torque is relevant

>>17499121
not in supercars

>>17499125
Most "supercars" are pigfat beasts. Yes, They need torque. c'mon man this is like grade 4 math and science.

>>17499197
>torque
>relevant
not everyone is hauling your mother around

>>17499125
It's not a supercar engine. If you put a two-stroke into a supercar you're insane. Still, torque is important in a car. I feel like you're on a different page here. But if you want nice sounding performance engines here's some retro examples

Inline 8
https://youtu.be/QgomL-RXLVo

F1 V12
https://youtu.be/6s7hf9-IeqY

And here's a bonus backfire from a TT V10 @2:08
https://youtu.be/H0JRMBGrab0

>>17499197
>>17499215
Don't respond to shitters. They do not care. They just want to make garbage posts. Howeever peak torque figures are also dumb. What matters is the area under the torque curve.

>>17500116
>Howeever peak torque figures are also dumb. What matters is hp/L.

ftfy

>>17500151
Nice bus pass you just posted.

Fuck all of you I drive a diesel I-6 hahaha

>>17494395
Pics of both.

>>17494395
It doesn't count if you're actually her father

File: Glorified, Overpriced F150.jpg (212KB, 692x937px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 692x937px

>>17490951

>$500k for F150 V6

kek

>>17493726
You could probably pulley an LT4 to 800 and the body would rust around it before the engine dies.

>>17494142
Wasn't it a retarded Aston Martin driver?

>>17500907

>it is ok bring jewed to death when Ford does it.

Good Goy. :^)

>>17500978

>runner up

Not impressive

>>17500966
GM actually investigated two blown engines that I know of, a good friend of mine is a zone rep, and they were overrevs. Not known if it wa the owner that overreved it. ECU on one had it revving to nearly ten grand like someone blew an upshift at wot.

>>17500973
I'm not a GM fan girl, I just hate you fucking autistic fucks who turned /o/ to shit.

>>17501004
>mechanically overreving an engine to 150% of redline is equivalent to hitting the limiter

>>17500994
You used the brits to do that, doesn't count

>>17501004
>Hitting redline
>As opposed to doing 2000rpm over
Please stop baiting, this isn't helping anybody

>>17501056
The redline of the LT4 is at most 7000rpm, and if
>>17500996
is to be believed, that's way over recommended, even with an ECU tune

>>17501043
I don't have the ECU read outs, but I was having dinner with the de region zone rep and his wife and we were talking cars and we got on the subject. He has no reason to lie to me, we've been friends for fifteen years.

File: file.png (903KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

903KB, 800x600px

Because inline 6 is objectively superior.

No replacement for displacement
Pushrods push gods
Four doors more whores
Four speed more speed
Rear wheel drive RIGHT wheel drive

>>17501082
pushrods a shit

>>17494162
>>>NA easygoing engine that will last forever with routine oil changes
>LT4
>N/A
>LT
>N/
>L
>N

s

>>17501032

ich 7ss

>>17493534
thats modern car design for ya

>>17490951
yeah, but imagine if you made that a 4.0L V8 with the same technology

>>17494376
Thanks for saving me the hassle of pointing out the obvious.

>>17493609
hey guys ,a boosted to fuck supercar v6(at 10 mines the price) makes more horsepower than a run of the mill, assembly-lined pushrod v8.....

wow.

also, while you're cherry picking, lets not talk about durability.

Mods, why the fuck is this not set to autosage? This is not discussion. This is not even bait at this point either. He makes this thread every. Single. Day.

>>17490951
>forced incucktion

File: 1466385051166.jpg (74KB, 471x960px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 471x960px

How do GM cuckholds deal with the fact that the ecoboost is better than the lt4???

>>17490951
>Comparing an NA to turbo. 50hp difference.

So what happens when you put a turbo on the LT4?

>>17508195
>put a turbo on a supercharged engine
gm fangirls actually this retarded. also lt4 isn't naturally aspirated.

>>17508244
>implying twincharging is bad

File: 1443328017895.jpg (78KB, 880x558px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 880x558px

>>17508258
makes the pushshit engine even more unreliable