90k miles 2002 Z28. Its auto but man its still fast as fuck and

>GM

I would preffer not to

>>17468260
>Any fbody owners in here can tell me what im in for?
You better be able to work on your car every week

>>17468263
>dumbass

>>17468277
That's if he wants to build it

>>17468260
>auto
Eh it's alright I guess. These cars are pretty reliable and still pretty quick. Price seems alright but it's an auto

That should be your main gripe

>>17468304
>GM fangirl

>>17468304
>wanting an inferior manual transmission
what the fuck

>>17468308
>owns a gmc
>talking shit

Lmfao
>>17468309
>Not wanting the god tier T56
>wanting the lame 4L60e

>>17468308
Look at this shit tier trolling. Gtfo this thread b fag. The Auto is faster on the LS1s stock I heard. And the reliability on the LS1 is solid so im not concerned about that

File: 1498067897343.png (238KB, 408x408px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 408x408px

>>17468332
>>17468327
a new edge mustang is better in every way, early ls1s are not reliable

a 4.6 is better at holding boost

>>17468260
Look into what it takes to change spark plugs.

File: 20160302_123913.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>17468373
yea but the 4.6 makes shit power. shit gas mileage.
>its better at holding boost
YOU NEED BOOST TO CATCH UP TO LS1
race me faggot

>>17468373
lol being slower is better? Didnt know that.

Also, the 2002 is not early for the LS1 though. Nice try trying to defend ur shitty 2v newedge

>>17468373
>new edge

Why would OP want to get a car that is inferior in everyway?

>>17468457
>>17468462
Hes such a fucking idiot.
>but muh boost
NO. REPLACEMENT. FOR. DISPLACEMENT.

File: cloudy.jpg (3MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x1836px

>>17468260
>4k for a 90k Z28
I paid 4k for mine and it was at 110k.
PULL THE FUCKING TRIGGER.

>>17468373
Also LS1's are very reliable and 2-valves are shit at boost.

File: PaycheckEater.jpg (4MB, 8918x3773px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 8918x3773px

$900 for mine with 201K and a rebuild 36K ago, but mine is a V6 sadly.

I'd say do it. The New Edge Mustangs others are mentioning here are slower in every way unless you find a top-spec Cobra or Mach 1, and even then it's not clear cut which is faster.

Mine at least has been plenty reliable.

File: Screenshot_2015-04-07-11-41-44.png (999KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

999KB, 1920x1080px

>>17468507
Yeah put top spec cobra or a termi can be like 20k. Mach 1's are just the newedge with a spring kit. Mach 1's are also expensive cause muh baby boomer pic related

>>17468277
I beat on my 98 SS almost daily and got 175k out of it before it threw a rod. T56 are God's gift to transmissions. Go for it bro/o/.

>>17468522

Mach 1s have the 32v 4.6, just not the blower like the Cobras have.

>>17468260
That car looks fucking hideous

>>17469485
that's why they are so cheap. fourth gen camaros and firebirds are dogshit ugly. the camaro is still the better looking one, the firebird is just outright hideous.

>>17468260

are those front overhangs even necessary?