Why are we still making cars when we've already reached

It never ceases to amaze me how many people on /o/ judge cars entirely on their aesthetics. A big part of why 911s look like they do is their RR layout

>>17466262
>911 has shit mechanics

???

get the fuck out retard

>>17466272
You literally have a mental disorder

File: image.jpg (20KB, 492x307px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 492x307px

>>17466234
Car design peaked here.

File: 1fin.jpg (615KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

615KB, 1920x1080px

As far as aesthetics go they arguably hit their peak in the 60s and 70s. Maybe we really should have stopped making new cars in the late 70s since they all look like shit.

File: image_0e9d67438afc45d1b5432e24aeff47885e88b8e9.png (610KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

610KB, 750x1334px

>>17466234

>not piling in to the 996 before values skyrocket

File: 1493427191256.jpg (6KB, 250x191px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 250x191px

>>17466278
You are literally low IQ

That is all.

>>17466301
Seconded I cannot believe how cheap these are right now

>>17466301
996 a CUTE
C U T E

>>17466301
>>17466315
>>17466319

You're not supposed to let people know until you've already bought yours.

>>17466262
...so?

File: 1969-1-2-Dodge-Coronet-A12-Super-Bee_335591_low_res.jpg (158KB, 790x527px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 790x527px

>>17466287

faggot

File: image.jpg (256KB, 640x520px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 640x520px

>>17466547
But the Challenger looks infinitely better.

File: vw-komm-4.jpg (95KB, 848x746px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 848x746px

>>17466234
Porsche could have stopped here desu

>>17466234
nice glorified beetle

File: 2017-Toyota-auris-1000x667.jpg (60KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1000x667px

Am I the only one who finds modern cars /aesthetic/ ?

File: Avalon_groceries.png (1MB, 816x1341px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 816x1341px

>>17467551
Most modern cars look like they fucking hate you and everything you stand for.

File: Screenshot 2017-07-01 at 10.15.31 AM.png (521KB, 1104x617px) Image search: [Google]

521KB, 1104x617px

>>17466735
>>17466547
>>17466287
boomers leave plz

File: Screenshot 2017-07-02 at 4.30.37 PM.png (319KB, 597x300px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 597x300px

these are aesthetic as fuck

>>17466234
>porsche
>ever beautiful
no

>>17466234
They're very well engineered machines with lovely interiors but exterior-wise they are pretty ugly

>>17467573
Nice b8 m8

>>17467589
agreed

When will car design go back to curvy looks? Everything is too edgy now.

File: z21432967IE,Alpine-A110.jpg (44KB, 768x432px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 768x432px

>>17466234
Why not?

File: ferrari_288_gto_by_braindead2k4-d364of9.jpg (246KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1024x640px

I dont know why they do it.

>>17466234
I never liked Porsches, but this pic really turned me on to them, how are the air-cooled engines and where can I find out more about them?

>>17466234
So did they just lathe off the face of the fuchs or do they actually sell wheels like that already?

>>17468314
Love the car, love the shape. Ferrari isn't one to do a homage model unless your name starts with "G" and ends with "lickenhaus" but if they ever do I hope it's a reincarnation of this one, pop up lights and all

>>17467573
The car looks great. Wouldn't everyone else in the thread be gen Xers by your standards?

>>17467554
when we look at what society has become and the shitty cars we are producing, I can totally understand why some cars look like they hate everything
who wouldnt be mad at wasting road space by sharing it with hipsters driving prius

>>17468343
Actually this gives me an idea. Ferrari hasn't even tried to get into the small roadster game but I think this setup:
>target $100k
>MR layout
>twin-turbo v6 or f6
>open or targa top
>carbon mono
>2 seat
>2 year old F1 tech they had laying around
>styled reincarnation of the Dino 246
I bet it would be fucking awesome. /o/ would hate it, which means it'd be awesome

>>17466234
Because care are about functionality rather then aesthetics?

Cars aren't art.

>>17468565
*cars