How long until cars are no longer a product you buy and own but

>>17423863
It's already 50/50 so...

When the urban sprawl of the city never ends. Imagine the entire habitual region of the U.S. as packed as NYC - then we'll see this happen, since public transport would deem cars a luxury with the amount of "polluting" "inefficient" traffic this would bring. Then you'll see this occur. Extreme overpopulation.
Until then there will always be old lonely rural roads where there won't be enough demand for service cars to be a thing.

>>17423917
Why do you put polluting and inefficient in quotation marks? Ever been to NYC? It -is- polluted and inefficient.

>>17423863
When autonomous cars become mandatory and non-autonomous cars may only be used on private property and race tracks. Privately owned "classic" cars will always be a thing. In 50 years from now someone might find his grandfather's old triple turbo two cylinder 0.5l hybrid CUV and restore it.

Won't happen in our lifetime.

I don't live in an urban hell hole. And there's no reason for my town to become an urban hellhole either. Let the teslafags have their unhappy future, meanwhile I'll be fly fishing and driving my "evil polluting" Suzuki Carry.

>>17424144
>Suzuki Carry
FUCK YEAH

>>17424117
It's already happening for those who choose to