>see a really nice car roll by >do a double take because

it might look good but it's still a kia

>>17422300
The design is ripped from Hyundai which is in turn ripped from Bentley. Nothing to see here, keep moving.

It may look decent (though completely unoriginal), but it's still a disposable car made by a shitty automaker that will lose 70% of its value in the next 3 years.

The Corvette looks good too. We all know how that turned out.

that k900 looks comfy as fuck on the inside but i dont hate myself enough to own a kia.

>see a really nice car roll by
>posts this picture

What did he mean by this?

>>17422585
>ripped off

Kia is to hyundai as ford is to mercury

>>17422660
please don't say hurtful things about GM thanks

>>17423231
Oh shit. Kia is owned by Hyundai. But what is Kia's purpose? Lexus is a luxury brand to Toyota. But that's clearly not the case here. So why does it exist?

>>17423245
According to the Kia website, Hyundai is more luxurious and geared toward older people, while Kia is """""sportier""'""" and cheaper geared towards younger people

>>17423245
kias are welfare cars, hyundai are poorfag cars.
>t. elantra owner

>>17423256
but yet they have things like the elantra sport which isn't at all geared to older people

they have their shit mixed up

>>17423256
>Hyundai
>Luxury

Lolwat

>>17423256
Yet neither make fits either of those descriptions

They seem disoriented