Anyone else hope they make a non-turbo version for semi-poorfags?

>>17421843
You'll be too old to drive one by the time it comes out.

>>17421843
Why stop at 300?

4 cylinder honda civics have turbos and 300 hp how heh.

>>17422041
>non-turbo

300HP from 1.6L naturally aspirated not good enough? There will obviously be a 400+ HP turbo version, but if it's anything like the FD, it'll be fucking expensive (60k minimum).

>>17422315

I dont see this car going for less than 60k period.

there's never ever going to be any version
http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/future-cars/news/a31802/mazda-ceo-kills-hope-new-rx-9/

>>17421843
They will never make one lmao