Can someone please explain the me the negative view on VGA cars?

>>17416260
>samsung
wut

>>17416282
Renault sells its cars under the samsung brand in china.

>>17416260
>no Mitsubishi

>>17416384
>Mitsubishi

>>17416260
Vga cars? Displayport cars are way better.

>>17416434
It means Volkswagen Group jackass

as long as yours isn't built in mexico you're good
t. someone who lives around lots of vag products

What a stupid image. It's meant to be one of the "These 7 people control 87 companies!" type images like you see for television and movies and similar fields, but with cars it's shit everyone already knows and doubly silly when the individual brands have always (or at least for most of their lives since the early 1900's) been part of the country, like Lincoln to Ford or Chevy, Cadillac and Buick to GM.

>>17416443
oh, VAG

>>17416434
DVI is where its at hun

>>17416492
Jeez now I look like a jackass, yeah I meant why is there so much stigma around VAG cars

File: evo-x.jpg (440KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1920x1080px

>>17416400
>Mitsubishi

>Subaru

Renault owns Samsung?

Doesn't Fiat owns Ferrari too?

File: enduranceSTI.jpg (49KB, 626x382px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 626x382px

>>17417127
>Fuji Heavy Motors

>>17416260
VAG parts seem to be designed to be cheap rather than functional, especially around the late 1990s-early 2000s. And the myth of "german reliability" is one of the all time greatest cons pulled on the american car buying public.

>>17417196
Its worse in eastern europe

>>17416384
>>17416400
They would be classified under Nissan, which oddly enough should be paired with Renault on that info graphic, but isn't

Also as has been said, Subaru and Mazda are missing but neither of them are being controlled by other automotive manufacturers

>>17417983
Mazda is controlled partly by Ford

>>17417150
Of course not, renault is 10 times smaller than samsung.
It's just a rebranding in asian market

>>17416260
The only VAG brand worth anything is Porsche.