Mazda, Audi, or Saab? Which is better for a turbo-charged

File: IMG_2248.jpg (67KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1000x667px

as if it would ever not be

>>17405050
Mazda cheapest parts.
Audi probably faster and normie status symbol, and muh understeer meme.
Saab probably sexiest imo but parts would be a little harder to come by.
>I'd pick the Saab myself.

File: 1978_saab_99_turbo_coupe_001_-5418e4a93f219.jpg (289KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 2048x1536px

>>17405050
Saab, Always.

>>17405067
I'd go with this I think, but I guess a 1.8T A4 wagon wouldn't be half bad either. Probably better built if I'm honest.

File: IMG_0108.jpg (144KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 600x800px

>>17405050
SAAB 9-2 AERO
A
A
B

9
-
2

A
E
R
O

Subie's aftermarket and performance, Saab's handsome styling. Literally perfect.