what's a car like this from the same period that's

>>17373250
That IS it. If you can't find anything cheaper than that, then you're being too picky.

File: Suzuki-Swift-with-a-1.3-L-G13B-03-1024x574.jpg (135KB, 1024x574px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1024x574px

Suzuki Swift, Geo Metro, etc.

>>17373250
A Honda civic you dum fuk, that's all what a CRX is

>>17373250
A caprice

>>17373250
fuck i am literally depressed right now
i'll never own a crx
fuck everything

>>17373250
aw11

its better too

File: nissan_silvia_grand_prix.jpg (225KB, 800x509px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 800x509px

Its called s12 and can be had for $500

>>17373342
Surprisingly heavy actually, over 2500lbs in most trims. Still, they're solid unlike most wet noodle cars of that era.

File: 91 Honda CRX.jpg (1MB, 2048x1371px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1371px

>>17373381
S12 is slow, pigfat and has little to no aftermarket in comparison to the Honda CRX

please neck yourself.

File: suzuki-swift-gs-05.jpg (41KB, 782x500px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 782x500px

>>17373275

THIS

S W I F T
W
I
F
T

File: 099.jpg (70KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1280x720px

>>17373418
Delet this

>>17373395
Mine is literally 2295 as stated on the title

>>17373381
>Dude is that an 86?

>>17373381
you triggered me hard

been looking out for one of these for over a year., until I got my MR2
the only one I saw was riced to shit in a junkyard

File: tmp_9303147293220367035813553.jpg (2MB, 2964x4227px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2964x4227px

What's so special about the CRX compared to the Civics at the time? Is it just an aesthetics thing?

>>17373381
Benchracing: The Post

>>17373801
Civics didn't have vtec at the time iirc

>>17373250
1988-1991 Civic Hatchback
Literally the same save for a few panels and trim pieces, and the whole hatchback vs liftback deal.
Less meme'd because not a CRX, also they had insanely barebones base models, even some had 4spd transmissions.