Why does /o/ hate the 2015-2017 V6 mustang? >300+hp(Around

Because a 300hp v8 model used is cheaper still and has way more room to grow. If you want a v6 sports car get a 370z. Part of the mustang experience is the v8.

>>17347030
So literally

>MUH VEE ATE

>>17347036
If you haven't driven one you won't get it. They're nothing special, just a larger sporty-ish coupe with the v6. The whole point is an affordable v8.

>>17347055
I've heard v6's sound like shit so yeah I get your point honestly

>>17347068
>V6's Sound like shit

Are u high? there are tons of cars with V6 engines that have godly exhaust notes.

>>17347078
The mustang's v6 isn't one of them. 90 degree IIRC. More so it's just that the v8 option exists, might as well get it. Put an exhaust system like a Magnaflow bolt-together set on them and you'll crack a smile just starting it up.

The Mustang V6 is for rental car fleets. Get a Camaro if you must have a V6, since it makes more power and has a decent redline, and is in a lighter car. Also you can get a track package (1LE) while you can't get the Performance pack with the V6.

File: modern fake muscle veesix trash eternally btfo.jpg (825KB, 1500x938px) Image search: [Google]

825KB, 1500x938px

>>17347021
>300+hp(Around the same as the 4.6 V8)
no you stupid nigger, it has ONLY 300 CRANK horsepower. it has even less when you put it on a dyno. the 4.6 veeeight from ford has 315 crank horsepower.

>N/A Coupe
what the fuck does this even mean. a v8 mustang is also an n/a coupe, it's also infinitely better than your v6 trash

>RWD
veesix fags this btfo they use """muh rwd""" to try to justify veesix trashstangs

>3500lbs (not terribly overweight like its V8 and Egoboost counterpart)
the veeeight mustang has a weight to power ratio of 8.517 (3705/435)
your veesix trash has a weight to power ratio of 11.753 (3526/300)
the veeeight is heavier but still shits on your anemic pile of 6 cylinder garbage

>Good exhaust note
HAHAHAHAHAHAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>0-60 5.4 secs (Around same as the SN95 4.6 V8)
the 2010 veeeight mustang does it in 4.9 seconds.
kill yourself

>Healthy Aftermarket
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>Good looks
lmao autistic poser doesn't want performance but he wants to look cool

>Cheaper to insure, maintain and fill up
if you can't afford a real muscle car go back to your $3k shitbox civic

>daily reminder pic related is the only muscle car ever built with a v6 that isn't trash

>>17347021
It has the best NA v6.

>>17347102
>90 degree IIRC
Irrelevant because the crank will be offset ground to compensate to 120 degrees. Nobody has done a straight 90 degree V6 since the Chevy 3.8 vibration monster

>>17347021
Mostly because the V8 Mustang exists which means you settled for the lesser car. If the V8 didn't exist /o/ would still hate the car because it's not some 80's shitbox so they can't afford it.

File: type r.jpg (1MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1360px

>Mustang V6
>300hp
>288lb-ft
>3588lbs

>Civic Type R
>306hp
>295lb-ft
>2910lbs

A Civic is literally better than V6 Mustang. Buy a Mustang GT or don't get one at all.

>>17347154
Why are u so triggered lol.

>>17347181
>FWD
>Same Chassis as an econoshitbox
>$35,000 for a fucking civic

>>17347181
>Mustang V6
><=$15k
>Chinese bullshit
>>$35k

First of the ecoboost only weighs like 200lbs now and you can tune it to over 450hp with the FPP and a FMIC. $2000, doesn't void the warranty, and is as fast as the V8. V6 takes way more money and work to make those numbers.

File: retarded baby.jpg (128KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1920x1080px

/o/ is such trash.

>shit on a +300hp V6 RWD coupe that looks great and comes with a proper gearbox for $25K

>then Ford releases a turbocharged 4 cylinder that sounds like absolute DOGSHIT and has no noticeable improvements over the V6
>charges another $3-5000 more for this Ecotoot version
>/o/ cums everywhere and starts screaming about "muh weight savings" and "muh torque" as if a turbo'd 4 cylinder is something to brag about, ever

Fucking retarded faggots, 90% of you. The V6 and Ecotoot don't compete with a 5.0L V8. If you want a GT, you're paying another $10,000 minimum. If you buy a used GT, you're buying something with HIGH mileage for the same price as a new V6/Ecotoot (though they won't be selling the V6 anymore).

You can either have a N/A V6 with good power and torque, that is decently reliable...or you can have a turbo'd version of an old Mazda engine for several thousand more, without any noticeable gains in performance.

File: 1440979215323.gif (2MB, 248x291px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 248x291px

>>17347591
this.

>>17347194
He isn't triggered, he just thinks it's hilarious how mentally retarded and wrong OP is. I'm a euro guy and even I agree.

>>17347559
Source on that? This is the only Boostang power package that is warrantied as far as I know.

https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-9603-M4

335hp/390lb-ft peak gains but with a shitload more area-under-curve.

>>17347021
a mustang without an N/A V8 is not a mustang, and this is coming from a yuropoor.
I was so disapointed when I saw an ecoboost exhibited in a mall, read the specs, and practically recoiled in shock when I saw the travesty of an engine they put in it. it is literally a fake mustang for posers. it is like those retaards making a cardboard chasis of a lambo over a bicycle.
that is what a non V8 mustang is. a lie.

File: psycho.jpg (21KB, 532x355px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 532x355px

>>17347624
>and this is coming from a yuropoor.

Then you should probably shut up Eurofag, because the first Mustangs ever made had 6 cylinder engines.

Besides, you'll never own a VEE-ATE MUSTANG, they won't sell them in your cucked vassal state. You couldn't afford the PETROL for one anyways.

>>17347154
This

>>17347607
The FPP tune alone won't get you GT performance, that's why you add on the FMIC and intake too.

>>17347591

I haven't seen anyone praising the ecoboost, isn't an engine under that high stress with presumably super low tolerance for error mean that they are all likely to go bang in 7 years time?

Should also admit that I like the Toyobaru so if i was after a Mustang it would have to be the V8

>>17347652

Spend any time on this board and you'll see that /o/ has a perpetual boner for the Ecotoot. It's pathetic the way they drool over that shit, especially the Fiesta and Focus STs.

And for the record, yes, these engines are likely to grenade themselves in short order. You can't take a simple aluminum block, give it direct injection, strap a cheap turbo to it, and crank up the pressure (THIS PIECE OF SHIT RUNS AT 18PSI) and expect it to last very long. Especially with the way these cars will be abused, and the lack of maintenance they'll receive (typical of most Ford owners to be negligent fuckwits).

>>17347021
>>17347030
>>17347181
I can beat the fuck out of these in my eg civic with a few simple mods.

>>17347678

I'm not sure that it's the same in smaller cars, but over here in Eurostan STs are nothing special and I haven't heard any horror stories

You can buy Focus 1.0 litre misery spec Ecoboosts though, that must be a grim drive. I think this is emission led though, not sue about how it would work in a Mustang (probably not very well).


I've spent a while here but haven't seen anything the Ecoboost, is it just because the majority of Americans didn't get the ST until recently?

>>17347646
kys

File: paris2016_webm.webm (2MB, 460x264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 460x264px

>>17347734

jelly europoor detected

i guess it's nice that europoors can only drive small ecoshit boxes, limits how much C4 Ahmed can fit in the car

>>17347751
>>17347646

What? I can go out and buy the proper 5.0 V8 Mustang tomorrow, our engine choices in the UK are either the Ecomisery or the V8, weirdly we don't get the V6

Not sure comparing the 'pony car' first gen Mustangs is appropriate for today's neo-muscle Mustang anyway

>>17347763

I just looked up the prices for a V8 in the UK...

>34,995GBP

>$60,000CAD

Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeesus fuck they rape you guys hard for such things.

We pay like $38,000 for a loaded GT here in Canada.

Sorry about your lot in life, dude. Try to get out of there.

>>17347648
That tune comes with an intake, and a FMIC doesn't increase power at all, just helps cool your engine so you can drive harder for longer. You might get another 10 hp out of an exhaust, but that's it.

The GT also has FPP packs. One gets 457hp/424trq (muh torque) and the other gets you 472hp/405trq (muh revs), both have a warranty.

>>17347797

Tbh mate it's just new cars, i'm not really interested in anything made post 2008 so it's cool, how much is 38k CAD in terms of average income in Canada? Average salary a year in uk is approx £22k in bong units

On the other hand used cars are super cheap over here as right hand rive and MPH instruments means no export market.

I do dream of emigrating but not to Canada sorry, too many non-whites and leftist sympathisers although you can have guns and lots of natural resources to you could be OK I guess

>>17347832

Well it depends on the province, but in Ontario you're effectively middle class if you make anywhere from 40-70 thousand a year. Anything above that is going to upper-middle class, and typically if you're hitting 100-120 thousand, you're at the top of middle class. Higher than that is upper. Lower than 40 is liveable if you're single, but you can't have a lot of nice things.

>>17347870

So a Mustang is a whole year's middle class salary? I would say £40k a year in the UK is about average middle class, so it would make sense for things to scale up from there. £100,000 a year is a huge amount of money, I'd say that was proper upper class over here

It seems that things don't quite scale up in a linear way, is Ontario posh or expensive? Is it much different in other provinces or have the Chinese and the CAD being in the toilet made no difference

>>17347870
I make 42k/yr and don't feel very middle class. "Bottom of lower-middle class" maybe. The insurance rates and cell phone bills here are fucking robbery.

>>17347942

Ontario is expensive but you don't get much for your money. Our sales tax is 13%, but our income tax rates are niggerish. Most people pay between 35-50% of their income to the government. That's Canada in general though - a safe place to live, but you pay through the nose for it.

>>17348074

Yeah it seems like the UK until recently (thanks religion of peace) - I'm very low down on the income ladder as an under-25 living independently with an OK job, still get jewed hard for over a third of my income for bullshit, at least I don't have student debt and leave in one of the cheapest parts of the country, London must be a nightmare

Are there any decent political parties over there or is it all socialist anti-car bollocks?

>>17347021
>anything but V8 in a Mustang, Camaro, or Challenger
Fag

File: christy clark2.jpg (23KB, 620x350px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 620x350px

>>17348127

Even our conservatives are getting cucked because the old white Canadians are dying out and their grandchildren are nu-male leftist faggots or raging feminazi queers.

So they're pretending they care about "trans-rights" and other such nonsense to appeal to a wider audience.

Overall though, it's a leftist hellscape.

>>17347021
Because V6 Accord is better.

>>17348654
>literally cancelled in 2018 in favor of turbos

>>17347154
bro shut the fuck up lol

>>17347165
But Anon, that's not the Honda Accord V6

File: 20170426_174101.jpg (3MB, 4088x2301px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4088x2301px

>>17347591
man i bought mine for 22000 with 15000 miles on it because i thought about newer v6/eco and man just find a late fifth gen with low miles.

>>17347021
>why is this gay?

>mustang
>v6

>>17347265

Pretty sure it's still faster than the mustang.

>>17347021
it doesn't have good looks, it looks OK at best

>>17349315

No one gives a shit about the 5.0, power is cheap to make. Supercharge a 4th/5th gen for cheaper than it would be to buy a late 5th or 6th gen, and it would have considerably more power.They want the IRS and the handling that comes along with it.

>>17347021
>good exhaust note
Nah you tripping

>>17349355
from personal experience with the 6th gens irs and a 5th gen with just lower control arms and rear sway bars the 5th handled just fine and lost all wheel hop, its stiff like a plank of wood but like does that really matter to people buying performance orientated cars.

also man buy a 3v 4.6 for cheap yeah but it will have miles poured on it then you spend a fat chunk of change to put an edelbrock on it and make like 450-470 at like 9psi, want more power get smaller pully blow up already old and spent motor.

or get a nice car with low miles that handles well with minor modification thats relatively cheap and has much more potential, putting 415whp down n/a not a lbs of boost touching the engine.

File: IMG_20160709_192145.jpg (2MB, 2988x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2988x2988px

>>17347154
No, it has 305hp not 300 (2011 to 2017 v6 mustang uses the same engine)

2005 to 2009 V8 has 300 HP, 2010v8 has 315 and...

ITS FUCKING SLOWER THAN A 2011 V6.

>4.9 secons 0 to 60
>V6 2011 does it in 5.1
>Still wins rsces at VIR by 3 seconds.
>EVEN WITH THE CUCMING 115MPH SPEED LIMIT, PRE 2011 V8 FAGS CANT COMPETE.

>>17349284
>Accord v6
>The best.

>>17347591
/O/ Likes the ECOBOOST better because with a tube, you can make 100hp or some shit, even though that Fisher Price engine will brake way faster than the V6 and can't make the same power as a modern v6 without forging the engine.
Plus, it needs premium gas and it actually gets worse mpgs than the V6.

>>17349315
Nice, I prefer that gen better too, V8 or v6, it just looks better and more American.

>>17349365
Sounds basically like a 350z engine, that's not bad by any means.

>>17347797
38k will maybe get you a base gt

File: 20170610_052847.png (357KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1080x1920px

>>17347591
Its also slower though, the 2011 V6 is both faster than the old 2010 V8 and the new 2015 ecoboost

File: maxresdefault.jpg (73KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1280x720px

It's a Mustang, not being associated with that inbreeding group of retards that is Mustang owners is the only reason I need.

>>17347678
>claims ecoboost engines will blow
>provides zero evidence nothing even anecdotal to backup his claim other then his own retarded bench science.

wew lad.

>>17349774
is that my nigga ryan?

Ya'll are retarded.

Even if the newer V6 makes more power than an older V8, no one is gonna respect you like they would if you owned a v8. It sounds a million times better than a v6, has more potential for mods/power gains, and is just more fun.

If you're gonna buy a v6, get a VQ not a Mustang.

I bought a 2017 GT after owning a 2004 V6. The sound alone changed my life, and I will never go back.

>>17347021
>Why does /board/ hate X?

gee it's an age old question that no one can answer


personally i want to get one, here's why in tldr

>21
>single
>no kids
>job doesn't require me to carry tools
and i live in burgerland which means
>straight roads with a few to none twisties
>speed limits so no need for high hp
>suburban/rural midwestern flyover state so long stretches of road
>somewhat hilly/slope-ish
>shitty roads full of cracks/potholes

no doubt i'll get shit from coworkers and peers for not getting a veeate but whatevs
either the stang or a 370 or a genesis, haven't decided yet

>>17350837
Why would you buy a new one when you could get a used 5th gen post facelift v8?

>>17350873
SRA vs IRS
that's why

>>17347021
You can't even get the track pack with the V6

And if you want to make 400bhp you'll need a supercharger, versus just a tune with the Ecoboost

>>17350837
Get the V8 you fucking pussy. You can make all the excuses and reasons up that you want, legit no one will respect you. No one. If anything since you're 21, single, and have no kids, you should be getting the V8 so you can enjoy it while you're young retard. Test drive one and you'll never go to the v6.

>>17347685
What mods?

>>17350905
So something that makes pretty much no difference to anyone but a pro driver facing flat out on a very bumpy track?

>>17350935
>no one will respect you
couldn't care less
>so you can enjoy it
i will enjoy my v6
>Test drive one
i have though, other than the exhaust note, there wasn't anything special. i've driven other v8 cars before, and like i said because of shitty roads i can't really do anything that i would have liked to

>>17350958
living in the midwest means shitty roads and 4 seasons in a day, i see cars fishtail and spin out all the time

>>17350959
I guarantee you you can find fun roads near you, you're not looking hard enough.

>>17350963
Lmao dude so do I, so stop bullshitting because that's flatout untrue. In fact you'd want the v8 more here because LSD for winter.

>>17350963
Get proper tires and learn how to drive, that has fuck all to do with a LRA

>>17350959
You obviously have autism.

The torque alone is reason enough to get a GT.

But, to further shit on your retarded excuses, if you don't have any twisty roads and it's all straight shots (which a GT is also better for...) then why do you give a flying fuck about IRS?

You will regret every single day buying that car. No leather, no premium screen, not drive modes, no steering modes, shitty exhaust note, slow as fuck, no respect, just another private owned rental car.

>>17350967
i've driven around within a 100 mile radius of my house, and know this because i finally decided to look it up with google maps, there are some but not enough
>>17350973
i guess so
>>17350976
but i do have proper tires, and i do know how to drive. it's other drivers crashing into me is what i fear. no one is prepared for an accident, no one. you don't go out and say "better be prepared to roll over" do you?

>>17350995
You'll have insurance and a modern car that's safe. And a good driver drives ddfensicdlg to avoid even other people being idiots. Alos psst
http://www.motorcycleroads.us

>>17350986
>No leather, no premium screen, not drive modes, no steering modes, shitty exhaust note
good, because i don't really care for that stuff
>slow as fuck
i'm not a pro racer but i'm neither a mom so it works for me
>no respect
from who? you? i couldn't care less what you thought of me. hell i'll even buy a 3.7 badge so everyone can tell it's not a v8
>private owned rental car
i'm ready
>>17351004
>ddfensicdlg
huh?

>>17351013
Defensively. Phone keyboard.

>>17350915
stratos (best v6 sound ever)
any alfa v6 (already more than 5 cars)
any ferrari v6 (dino)
nsx
new ford gt
niw you'll proceed to lecture meabout why these cars sound like shit, the reason being they are v6's

>>17350973
Every mustang post 2011 has LSD.

Performance Package or no? Premium features worth it?

I'm buying a new car in the next year or so and the mustang is desirable for the cheap HP. Do these things make a difference? I would be DDing it.

>>17351319
>V6
>performance pack
Just get a lightly used V8 from the last gen

>>17347068
I'm not one for muscle cars, so idk what I expected, but I drove a friend's brother's V6 Mustang to the store because he was too drunk, and that thing was so slow. I actually asked my friend if there was a sport mode or something because of how sluggish the acceleration was. It was the generation before current though.

>>17347181
FRONT

WHEEL

DRIVE

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>17351547
That was the plan. Should i find one with the PP and is the premium worth it?

>>17351627
Depends on what you value more. If you're buying a sportscar I believe the performance pack is more desirable
>but muh colour changing LEDs!

>>17351547
I would get a prev. gen GT 5.0 but insurance on a 19yr old is suicide for a V8 coupe where I live. I can afford the car but I will spend a fortune on insurance and the meme V8 gas milage. My only options are I4 and V6 coupes

>>17351723
Honestly just get a Civic for now, learn to become a better driver

The speed academy guys can take a Civic around out local race track faster than Notamiata in his S2000

File: IMG_4941.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>17351627
I have a premium and performance pack. Premium is worth every penny. Performance pack on a DD is kind of bragging rights but the brembos are a nice upgrade

>>17351891
One could argue that daily driving a sports car is bragging

File: jaguar-f-type-road-test-16.jpg (48KB, 900x596px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 900x596px

>>17351063
this V6 as well

>>17347154
Make me kek but agree

File: 1496574972329.png (25KB, 669x514px)

25KB, 669x514px

>>17347154
>if you can't afford a real muscle car go back to your $3k shitbox civic
Dumbfuck that doesn't realize a budget goes on a spectrum, not two extremes of 4k and 40k

Poor little brainlet

>>17351547
You mean a 5.0 2011-2014 right? Because older gens with the 4.6 engine suck ass compared to any modern v6 Mustang.

Also the ECOBOOST is slower because it overheats.

>>17349757
See pic related

File: IMG_8027.jpg (74KB, 800x402px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 800x402px

>>17351944
I have a 3 inch penis so it kind of is lol

>>17351802
lol I have a NC miata rn, 6 speed which is my second car, Have been driving for 4 years with no accidents or tickets. Why would I get a shitbox?

I know how to drive lol.

File: 1467948669261.jpg (23KB, 500x368px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 500x368px

>>17347870

>70,000 maple bucks: "middle class"
>50,000 dollarettes after taxes
>current exchange from CAD to USD: a whopping 37,000.
>"middle class"... lol

MFW I make 71,000 a year, more than my mom and dad combined when they retired in the late 90's... and I still can't afford a Mustang GT with the rising cost of gas in Ontario thanks to Trudeau and Wynne.

A V6 is my only option for a DD.

>>17352013
>19 year old
>wants to waste money on multiple cars

>>17350742

"respect".... driving a mass produced every-man's sports car. OK...

>caring what other people think

>>17347591

This

>>17352013
>I know how to drive
Yeah, so does my little sister, instill wouldn't put her in a Mustang

>>17347030
>v6 mustang is better than v6 370z though

>>17352410
You know how many retards drive Mustang GTs. Its not fucking rocket science just dont mash the fucking peddle in a turn and ur good.

>>17352650
Oh I guess you just want to daily drive it and not track it

>>17351586
Yeah, my grand marquis actually feels quicker, if you can believe that.

I bought a 2014 GT Mustang 40k miles w/ premium package (leather seats), brembo pack, electronics package, 6R80 slushbox for $19k on the last day of the year last year.

If I sold it now, I can get a good 21k for it, 10,000 miles later lol.

Just wait until the off season and buy a used one you'll love.

>>17347021
It looks like a Fusion coupe

>>17349324
This

File: 20170610_212615.jpg (3MB, 3684x1440px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3684x1440px

just get the 5.0 you know you wanna

File: 20161223_132435.jpg (366KB, 915x1005px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 915x1005px

>mfw my car is now "slow" but I love it too much to upgrade

>>17353043
sell it and get a 5.0

>>17352978
Coyotes rev that high? I thought they only got to 6500 RPM or something.

>>17353060
Judging by the graph there wasn't any point in going over 6700, so you're not wrong.

File: yellow mustang gt.jpg (2MB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1360px

>>17349757

The cyclone V6 Mustangs are undoubtedly the best, most under-rated coupe of this decade. It's a fucking shame Ford is killing them in favour of their goddamn cucked Ecotoot shitbox.

The engines are going to grenade so quickly, they'll be a blight on Ford's legacy in no time. You can't run an engine that small at high boost pressure ALL THE TIME and expect it to last very long. Say what you will about Ford "building it" properly, there's no way they did the internals properly on such a cheap port-over from the old Duratecs/MZR line.

Mazda tried this with their Speed3s with the 2.3 DISI. The end result is that most people with higher mileage Speed3's (100,000+) are having serious compression issues or needing new turbos. That is, assuming their body hasn't rotted out first.

An under-worked, larger displacement engine will always last longer and deliver more consistent performance than a bite-sized 4 cylinder running high boost.

>>17349774

This child looks sickly. Is he getting to drive that for some Make-A-Wish foundation?

>>17349777

>bitter ecuckboost owner detected

sorry you didn't buy a proper NA powerplant, faggot

File: Mustang - Mach 1 - 1970.jpg (96KB, 1000x567px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1000x567px

>>17350742

Not everyone can afford the GT, it's considerably more expensive. You're looking at another $10-15K for a GT, and while it does sound objectively nicer, the performance gains from stock version are pretty negligible.

If we're talking strict benchracing numbers (when are we not on /o/?), you're paying about $10K minimum for less than 1 second faster at 0-60mph. A late model V6 Mustang (Cyclone) will do it in about 5.3, and a late model GT (Coyote) will do it in about 4.5.

Keep the basic numbers in mind, here. 305hp. RWD. 2 doors. Beautiful styling. Nice interior. Handles well.

For about $25,000, that's a great deal. If I had oodles of money I'd certainly get a V8 (though I'd probably get a Shelby 350), but most people aren't in the market for a $40,000 V8 as their DD.

>>17353149
Actuallyu 2015 and 2016 used examples go for around $16,000

>>17353247
and a 2014 GT can be had for (as I said previously) 20k used with a clean car fax in the off season.

>>17353254
>19-21yr old Insurance rates are highway robbery
>More money on Gas
>Older body style
>Prices are still inflated
>Unless you floor it everyday or track it is there really a difference besides sound since the V8 is only faster when both cars are at WOT, rest of the time your just putting around town not using the power.

There is a reason the Ecoboost and the V6 sell. Not everyone needs or can afford the V8, and the V6 and ecoboost are great cars in their own respect.

Cant complain about a 300hp+ good looking coupe with RWD and N/A power.

>>17353435
I had a v6 previously and I would buy it just for the sound alone.

Roush axle backs make it sound like a growling animal.

Also fuck mpg lol

>>17353435
P.S. the 13-14 body style is the best body style since the classic stangs.

15+ look like euroshit, and are slower than the previous gen.

>>17353076
Max HP is clearly at 7.6k RPM.

>>17353569
yeah its def making power up there it is hard to see because dyno graph was so short, ill need to get a dyno sheet showing full 0-7600 rpm which gives better perspective, but my point stands.

File: RyVuse1.png (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>17347591
I choose to stay with muh vee ate, despite it likely being slower than an ecoboost.

>>17353569
Graph is flat from 6500. You're not doing anything but making noise over that.

>>17353569
>Dips just prior to max power as hard as the peak
Max HP is clearly at 7.6, but what's the point in revving it out that hard when you could be making the same power in the next gear.

>0-60 the same as an I4 3-series

Embarrassing.

File: 03-performance-white-boss-302.jpg (306KB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1280x850px

>>17353492
I prefer 2011 - 2012 better, they look perfect, muscular and sportier without being tacky like the 2013 or straight up ugly like the 2017.

>>17353951
>0 to 60 the same as car triple the price

Sounds pretty darn good.

>>17353951
Want to know something funny?

https://youtu.be/FSqWD5BSeoY


2011 V6 mustang is faster in both, acceleration and curves.
>Paying over 60k for a BMW Cuck car that's slower than a 20k v6 Rustang with IRS and shitty Pirellis.

>>17350915
JAGUAR F TYPE NIGGER
AMG
STRATOS
GT
ALFA

DUMBASS

>>17353043
>4.6
It was slow when it left the factory lmao

>>17354546
Eyes look retarded w/, outdated headlamps

>>17347021
because the ecoboost is superior in virtually every aspect

Get a GT or go home once you drive either a camaro SS or mustang GT and have driven the baby models you understand. Same with the chargers especially the 2017s Hemi's it's not even comparable to the smaller engines

>V6 not offered with performance pack
>V6 not offered any power or handling packs by Ford Racing
>V6 not sold in Europe or Australia where they have to impress rather than sell on reputation
>V6 not available in 2018 refresh

If Ford doesn't have faith in it as anything but a rental fleet car, why would you?

>>17349254
>he bought the V6


lmao you fucked up

File: 54cb241a68ab9_-_missed-cars-07-1213-lgn.jpg (47KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 600x450px

>>17355227
>Cars being discontinued means they were bad.

No, 2.3 engines are cheaper to produce and they are pushing the ECOBOOST meme, in real life, a stock v6 is faster and more reliable than a 2.3l turbo.

>>17353043
>0-60 in 5.2 seconds
>slow

The 3 valve isn't a coyote but it's def not poo poo. Throw some bolt ons and a tune at it and it'll be pretty quick

>>17355348
Same time as a v6 mustang, therefore slow by /o/ standards I guess

>>17355389
The bus /o/tists ride on do 0-60 in 17.9 seconds. Some new buses hit 60 in 15 seconds flat, that's a fast standard.

File: 110398098.jpg (166KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 1024x768px

Why is a 2015 Mustang V6 coupe with 300+hp rwd NA engine that is true and tested, a 6 speed and sticky tires gay for someone with a $17k budget?

Are V8 shills mad that the new V6 is just as fast as the 4.shit in the old GT's?

>>17356538
People who drive fourth hand Cavaliers lift their noses at your V-6 mustang.

>>17353909
>>17353940

not that anyone is still on this thread but just to reply my first gear ratio goes from a 4.17:1 to a 2.31:1 the rpm drop off is from 7600 to 4500 and 2nd to 3rd is from 7600 to 5000, also with a raise in rpm my 3rd gear shift speed is raised to 115 mph which is right inline with my trap speed currently, when i procharge ill drop the 3.73 for a 3.23 or 3.15 gear and should get 130 out of 3rd gear then.

as well as only making noise when hp isnt being increased thats not how it works, there is still 400 to the wheels which is going to cause acceleration and as mention my gearing drops back pretty far in the range.

>>17347021
why the fuck would you buy the v6 when theres a 300hp 4 banger

>>17358908
Cheaper and you get 2 more cylinders. And its more reliable and doesnt sound like a mazda 6

>>17347021
because the V6 needs a fucking turbo + alot of work to get over that 350hp from the factory

the v8 litreally only needs what cams + tune

>>17358918
muh weight distrbution
muh low low end torque for corners

>>17347021
>Around the same as the 4.6 V8
>Around same as the SN95 4.6 V8
why not just get an old shitbox sn-95 with one of the best sounding V8s in the history of automobiles then?

>>17358920
What is /o/'s obsession of having the fastest car if someone is looking for a sports coupe they can daily.

The fuck cares who has the fastest car on the block, none of you race or track everday and very rarely do any of you WOT on ur daily. I do it on occasion but not at every stoplight.

At the end of the day A V6 Mustang has plenty of power to pass retards on the highway or on any road with 300+hp on a RWD irs platform that looks good and is comfy. Its over $10,000 than a V8 amd for someone that wants a sports coupe and has a limited budget its a great car.

People need to stop taking bench racing numbers seriously and buy whatever the fuck car they like based on their budgets, needs and research. A V6 mustang is faster than over 95% of the traffic you will encounter daily so who gives a shit which car has a better 1/4.

>>17347021
>Good exhaust note
Not as fast as a v8 with less power, just pitiful.

>>17347036
Have you driven a v8 car. (That's not a landyacht)

>>17358958
V6 has less displacement and torque. HP is a meme number to be honest.

>>17349284
At least shill a decent v6 like the nissan vq series.

>>17358920
You can make over 350 HP on a 3.7 V6 at the crank with nothing more than a tune, CAI and short headers.

>>17349774
kek Mustangs are way better than shitty ass BMWs we get in Europe

>>17347154
V6cucks BTFO

>>17360096
Alphonse stop samefagging.

We know its you since you say veeate and veesix and use """""""x""""""" on every other word.

>>17350939
10 point cage with Parachute
3 piece discontinued JoJo frontend
spec-R full drag suspension
Fuel cell with -8 lines from tank to motor
1 044 bosch pump
1200 rc injectors
golden eagle sleeved block
cp 10:1 pistons
Eagle rods
arp headstuds
oem h22 headgasket
Balance shaft delete
competition clutch twin disc
Port and polished head
skunk2 valve springs and retainers
Str cam gears
crower stage 1 cams
aluminium radiator with slim fan
gsr transmission with itr lsd.
qsd h2k intake manifold adapter
k20 rbc manifold
qsd throttle body spacer
blox 70mm throttle body
4bar omni map sensor
6al msd with coil and cap. 3 step launch control
hks bov
Garret 102mm turbocharger.
Custom t4 front facing turbo manifold with 44mm flange
44mm tial wastegate
Custom water to air intercooler set up
aem eugo wideband w/ gauge
tuned on chipped p28
13 inch volks drag rims
2 15 inch volks rear rims
arp extended wheel studs
si cluster
150 shots of nitrous im making 348 horsepower to the FRONT WHEELS because thats the only place the power should ever be

>>17360517
Kek

>>17360517
>CIVIC WITH FUCKING PARSCHUTES

>>17360517
>drag rims
>civic

Top kek

>>17362441
>>17363509
>this new

>>17363562
with how often this pasta has been posted recently, it's hard to belive

>>17363588
I was deliberately baiting for that pasta, I dunno why others took that response seriously.

>>17347021
/o/ hates the V6 Mustang because most of the people here are fucking dumb. They'll praise an 08 GT but trash a S550 V6. Most of the people here drive shitty Civics, so who really cares what they think?

>>17349831
No, that's John Fulks.

File: GMbtfo.png (735KB, 960x714px) Image search: [Google]

735KB, 960x714px

>>17368321
Someone making sense on /o/? Unheard of.

Anyways yes, nevermind the V6 S550 mustang is the lightest mustang you can buy. And with a few simple bolt-ons and a nice tune with some sticky tires it is faster than 98% of the traffic you will encounter daily. (Can push 350hp easily with minimal investments)

It's beyond me why people think the ecoboost is worth the extra dollar when the V6 is cheaper, lighter and more reliable and you get 2 extra cylinders.

File: 1387010691014.jpg (26KB, 429x410px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 429x410px

How good is the 2005 Mustang? Once I get my truck in sellable condition and a little money saved up, I was thinking of selling the truck and buying one.

File: image.jpg (1MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1936px

I'm having a blast.

File: 1365487413645.jpg (94KB, 597x455px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 597x455px

>this thread
Both are valid options for a mustang. >New V6s aren't as shit as the old ones but still pretty shit. Good option for if you want decent stoplight racer speed but you'll hate that base model Kias have way better interiors.
>For the same price a V8 will usually be better than the V6 option, even if it's a bit older or higher mileage. Extra weight is moot point because muh torque and nobody cares about turning.

>>17347154
Grand Nationals are way overrated trash. Just because your at the top of a pile of shit (Cars of that generation) doesn't mean you aren't still shit.

>>17369058
See, I would get a 5.0 they are in budget but since im 19 the insurance would be wallet rape.

>>17368830
If you want a cheap tuneable V8 car that looks and sounds great, it's fantastic.

File: 01-2017-chevrolet-camaro-1le-v6-fd-1.jpg (530KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 1920x1080px

Because why get that garbage when you can get the 1LE V6 Camaro if you want a V6 muscle car? It's faster than anything in it's price range on a track and also ALMOST outperforms very expsensive cars like the BMW M2 losing by less than 0.8 seconds, has a great exhaust note and overall performs fantastic.

The V6 mustang has none of these things.