>be Audi >be "vorsprung durch technik" >8

>>17341978
*almost had no grip @ 84 km/h

>>17341978
looking at their videos, they don't seem to know how to push a car to the limit and often just give up when they encounter body roll or understeer. see their GT-86 and ND Miata tests and you'll see what I mean, I don't think they understand weight transfer.

>>17342053
I think they need to draw lines on the road and not rely only on cones, because it's more useful.

Also, this proves that a well thought suspension setup is for the win:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMXjC5ytuaY

>>17342070
the big thing I see here is that the traction/stability control doesn't upset the balance of the car, which a lot a cars have problems with.

>>17342097
Explain this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATCoPbL2uwA

>in b4: Nissan

>>17342291
wow, it performs exactly like the Juke with the bouncing, only the juke gets airtime.

File: 1494630564380.png (141KB, 325x237px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 325x237px

>see their GT-86 and ND Miata tests and you'll see what I mean
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9dLIR-ayJY
the fuck

>>17342053
the test is meant to be an emergency swerve not setting up for a corner

>>17342444
so when a car understeers in an emergency, you just straighten the wheel and drive off the road?
>>17342389

File: 1460765230718.png (599KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 500x750px

the moose test is so stupid, what if the mosse decides to run to the left lane?

>>17342634
not to mention most of the time you swerve to avoid a moose it's late at night, and you don't have to jerk the car back out of the oncoming lane. it's the only suspension test that is really used to show stability, though.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgpDLX5YAYY
RIP moose test king.