Okay, I may need some help with this, I have a chance to buy

I wish I could do that

>>17337025
So, is that a; "Yes, go for it you fucking idiot."?

Had an 86.5 and kind of miss it. I've seen really nice, low mile ones asking $15k. It was very reliable and they probably still are. It was my daily driver for 3 years.

And you realize the picture you included is a Mk1, right?

>>17337122
Huh, I didn't really notice but it's really clean and the $3k is very enticing. I don't really want to tune it or anything, just use it more of a manual cruiser. Do the 1986.5 have any common problems?

>>17337122
Nope, it's a MK2 you mongoloid.

File: 543645654.jpg (126KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1200x675px

Here's some pictures by the guy.
http://imgur.com/a/C3Mzt

>>17337288
What are you waiting for? Our approval?

>>17337288
old cars always looks like shit inside.

>>17337299
Not really, just wanting to know if there are any certain common problems to the Mk II Supra. I know that the Mk III's suffer from head gasket problems.

>>17337306
Couldn't tell you but you should but it anyways.

>>17337047
obviously do it you piece of shit, its a japanese rwd manual inline 6 that is easy as piss to work on. I did basically the same thing (mine was an r32 skyline) when i didnt know the first thing about cars and i couldnt be happier

>>17337306
it literally does not matter at this point. The car is over 30 years old at this point, once you get it the first thing you should be doing anyway is replacing every single replaceable part you can

>>17337334
Well, I checked everything out and the guy just got done tuning it and replacing the belt. I drove it and it's in almost mint condition.

I'm going to buy it either way, I hear the engine parts are pretty inexpensive but the interior isn't as cheap.