Thinking of buying a V6 Camaro. Should I get a 2016 or

>>17312094
Get a 2016, might be a bit more pricey but it's not as pig fat and it has a little more oomph.

File: Fordbtfo.png (546KB, 941x734px) Image search: [Google]

546KB, 941x734px

2016, do not get the 5th gen V6, its lame.

In 2016 they added 15 more HP, A sick exhaust note,15 more Horses and it lost 350+ lbs. You def want to get the 6th gen. And its faster than a Mustang GT round a track if you opt for some extra goodies lol.

>>17312149
Uh oh, better take cover before alphonse sees this

File: image_0.gif (2MB, 270x188px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 270x188px

>>17312274

>>17312274
inb4

>muh older model (even though the S550 is current gen)
>muh different year
>muh different driver
>muh weather conditions

Ferd shills come up with so much shit outta there ass its not even funny to defend their shitty 5.slow

>>17312149
still 100 less hp than the fast stang

>>17312094

If you are going to spend so much money on a newer car you might as well spend the few more grand to get the v8

>>17312149
1LE Stronk.

>>17312094
Buy a gun and kill yourself

File: V8.jpg (29KB, 1280x530px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 1280x530px

>V6
WRONG

>>17312149
>>17312274
>>17312298
>>17312322
>>17312386

To be fair, Camaro is more on the sport side than GT side. its like comparing an M2 to a Mustang. the smaller lighter M2 is going to be more nimble.

>>17312094
cuck

File: camaro vs m2.jpg (129KB, 1900x966px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1900x966px

>>17312399
M2 you say?

But no I get what you mean Anon, but they're still competitors I think it's fair to compair the Camaro and Mustang, though their V-6 options fill different spots in their line ups. (Camaro's is mid range, Mustang is entry spec secretary mobile)

File: v6legit.png (685KB, 1018x680px) Image search: [Google]

685KB, 1018x680px

>>17312397
>>17312378

>Stuck in the 90's and mid 2000's

6 Cylinders is the future bruv, the V8 is dead, just look at the Ford GT and every porsche and GTR and NSX and so on.

Also this
>>17312149

Sure I would take the SS anyday but for $21,000 a new 2017 V6 camaro is hard to beat in terms of performance per dollar in a newer car.

>>17312440
> v8s dead
>gm getting 30 + mpg with a pushrod V8

>>17312449
What fucking car?

>>17312440
>Ford GT
That's just a saD example of regulations in racing cucking cars and forcing them to be less powerful and have less displacement than they had before.
>>17312449
i bet they could get tree fiddy if they had a 20 gear transmission.

>>17312467
Can tell you never drove a C5 vette with a 6 speed

>>17312094
Is that a matchbox car?

>>17312094
How do you see out the windows?

>>17312149
>different model year
>different driver
gm fangirls actually this desperate

>>17312298
>implying inb4 discounts valid observations
gm fangirls actually this retarded

File: rip corvette.jpg (129KB, 823x903px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 823x903px

>>17312467

File: epic_lulz.jpg (61KB, 600x582px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 600x582px

>>17312520
>One year apart
>Shitty v6 owns v8
>Same price
Holy shit, the grasping is real

File: 1435629241035.jpg (47KB, 345x383px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 345x383px

>>17312540
>new gen vs last gen
gm fangirls actually this desperate rotflmao

File: 1444058287807.jpg (186KB, 680x750px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 680x750px

>gm. fangirls just ragequit

>>17312550
>last gen

>Current gen is still the S550

Are ferd shills denying reality, thats a new low

>>17312605
nope the 2018 mustang is the new gen. sperg more

File: currentgenretard.png (537KB, 1901x951px) Image search: [Google]

537KB, 1901x951px

>>17312620
Goto the ford website, and tell me what Mustang you can build and price and order now. Not a car that is still being produced and not for sale now.

Oh right, the same one that got ass blasted around a track by a V6 camaro, try again alphonse.

File: ednOmka_d.jpg (176KB, 640x1138px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 640x1138px

>>17312632
sperg more. the 2018 is the new gen

>>17312635
Meltdown achieved, relax bro

>>17312786
cool projection. sperg more

>>17312822
Alphonse u r playing urself right now. I'm going to keep replying because watching you desperatly shitpost ur way out of this is hilarious.

File: 1487110837881.png (359KB, 435x643px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 435x643px

>>17312836
sperg more.

File: Picture006.jpg (55KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x480px

>>17312459
>>17312467

File: 2017-05-06_20.19.04.jpg (2MB, 2162x1578px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2162x1578px

>paying $35k to have less power at the crank than a 10 year old Cadillac puts down on the pavement

LOL

>>17312853
>30 mpg
>coasting downhill
wow it's fucking nothing

>>17312870
>His car isn't geared for 180+mph

>>17312855
We get it, you own a 10 year old nig nog cadi with a bigger engine in it, no one cares. And the V6 Camaro new can be had for under 23,000 easily.

Also, 335hp on new Maro V6. At least know the numbers, 337hp wow so impressive. No one cares dud, btw we on same team GM.

>>17312879
>coasting downhill
>extreme gearing
>gets 30mpg
what a surprise

File: IMG_20170506_114605.jpg (4MB, 4640x2610px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4640x2610px

>>17312887
We ain't on the same "team". And learn whp vs crank hp

>>17312890
my record in my 2016 camaro ss is 29.5 mpg / 400 miles

>>17312094
Just get a rx7 turbo and be happy.

>>17313925
.....for the week that it's running.

>>17313925
What next, you gonna tell him to just get a 944?

>>17313982
Your thinking of the rx8. Rx7s are solid.

File: 1496026709892.png (530KB, 1348x696px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 1348x696px

>another thread turns into an anti-GM V6 vs V8 sperg fest

>>17314080
I'm trying promote rotary love. Feel it with me.

>>17312887
Pp please we are same team, don't be mean.
Lol look at this cuck