Which one should I get /o? >All regular cabs >All

>>17272548
Either top right or bottom left

>>17272548
4.0

>>17272548
Whatever you do, do not get a Ford Ranger.

>>17272590
But which 4.0?

>>17272611
There is only one AMC 4.0

>>17272548
Bottom left or bottom right, if you can score a good deal on the Toyota and the frame is decent, jump on that.

The ones with parts available.

>>17272548
get the jeep. they are fucking indestructible.

File: eb0.jpg (22KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x500px

Are D21 Hardbodies good?

>>17272607
What's wrong with a Ford Ranger senpai

>>17272695
frig off randy

>>17272548
Civic for 3k.

>>17272752
I've heard rust is quite prevalent on certain models (I want to say 2006+ but I'm not sure) and the V6 engine in the is not that great.

>>17272998
Are you taking about the Venom 3.0 V6 or the 4.0 V6?

>>17272998
Shit, I mean Vulcan not Venom

>>17273056
>>17273064
I saw a thread awhile ago on the whole Ranger situation and honestly I don't know. The general assumption I got was the frame was more susceptible to rust than other trucks and that the engine wasn't all that great power-wise

>>17273081 probably the Vulcan than since it only has like 140hp

>>17272695
fuck off randy

Ok, the Comanches rust out something awful. The toyotas are great daily drivers. The Hardbodies also rust out fucking awful. The Ford, they are everywhere! Parts are available easily. If it were me I'd choose a clean Hardbody. But expect to pay a pretty penny.

>>17273081
The Vulcan's are reliable, but they don't get that much better mileage than the 4.0. The frames in my experience (2 94s from the salt belt) are just fine, but spring shackles and the frame mounts will rust away. Pull the bed and spend $150 at RockAuto for parts, and a few hours and a torch and that shiz is like new. Did 3 out of 4 shackles and mounts on my Bro-in-laws truck in 3 hours.

>>17272548
Jeep. It looks the best. Has the second best power. Great 4x4. Best size interior. Doesn't get cucked by Mazda/Nissan 4cylinder.

>>17272611
>>17272638
Ah Ford 4.0 v6
>>17272744
If you are a Mexican or fag.

>>17272752
Anyone who shits on rangers has probably never owned one. Except CC81PT, who was retarded and thought a 4 cylinder gutless truck would be fun,

>>17273360
My 4 cylinder Ranger is fine. I get them emmpeegees and know I'm not going to win any stoplight challenges. And that's.....OK. Still better than an Iron Duke S10 that feels/sounds like my lawn mower.

>>17272548
Comanche

>>17272548
comanche!

>>17272744
I've had 3 of them, they're really shitty. Get the taco.

>>17272553
FPBP, came here to say the D
>parts are everywhere
>easy to work on
>less cost than a taco
downsides: IFS and japanese tier clearcoat

>>17272695
fuck off randy

File: IMG_0810.gif (207KB, 300x102px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 300x102px

T A C O M A
A
C
O
M
A

>>17272744
Depends on whether or not they've been molested by previous owners. Stock Hardbodies will probably outlive you with normal maintenance, but they're super popular among clueless rednecks for modding into bush-buggies and rock crawlers .

>>17272695
Frag of, Randy.

>>17272548
god i wish i had a mint hardbody

>>17272548
i assure you the tacoma willbe the most fun and reliable if you do your part

>>17273360
I wasn't shitting on the Ranger, I was just saying I have heard they aren't that great.

>jeep
wont make it out of the lot lol, I thought Randy Bobandy claiming they're indestructible was hilarious though
>ford will be rusted to fuck depending on where you live
>also will smell like taco farts

Tacoma is my vote

nissan hardbody.

I would realistically get a ranger here, but only because there are 1 million of them in junkyards everywhere so parts are as easy as it gets.

>>17275274
>9000 dollars
>for a two wheel drive 15 year old vehicle
lmao

>>17275708
>9 thousand dollars
>OP wants a 5-lug
Bruh that's 4k at most

>>17275740
>4x4 tacoma
>4k
more like 14k

>>17275768
Oh duh, saw the 5-lug in the picture but skimmed over where OP said 4x4

Depending on the condition, a 4x4 1st gen Tacoma will cost between 7 and 9 thousand

>>17272548
The Comanche of course.

What are your guys opinion on the Ford Rangers? Specifically the 3.0 V6