Is /o/ more based than we think? Perhaps some good actually does

Old /o/ was better.

Nu-/o/ a shit.

>>17258141
/o/ has it's high points and is definitely informative. It's a shame this board is garrisoned by retards and permanent busriders though.

>>17258141
Like all of 4chan, there's very useful information, covered by a thick layer of shit.

>>17258147
/o/ was always shit

>>17258376
>le /o/ was always shit maymay

>>17258376
This
>>17258147
But also this too. It's gotten worse, way more know nothings.

>>17258151
It's always been that way.

File: alphonse.jpg (160KB, 1291x533px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1291x533px

>>17258151
>It's a shame this board is garrisoned by retards and permanent busriders though.

Trolls like that alphonse == musashi

>>17259938
>he's THIS obsessed
lmao, keep sperging

ive been here daily since like 2008

its a lot more arguing and people replying to trolls than it ever used to be

but the fact is there are more people with autism than any other mental issue in this world (1 out of every 45) than there used to be

>>17258147
>>17259975
t. newfags
/o/ was never good

>>17259975
>its a lot more arguing and people replying to trolls than it ever used to be
Well, that's because the internet forums and chat zones have evolved to ban persistent trolls or even call the FBI down upon them after the online commerce laws were updated. There are few places left that people can express themselves openly without ban. So of course they come to 4chan.

Think about it. If 4chan was gone, where could you talk freely without something a forum ban, your ISP account, or you in real life?